IG vs Charles Schwab 2026
In this head to head comparison of IG vs Charles Schwab, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
In this head to head comparison of IG vs Charles Schwab, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
IG and Charles Schwab both enjoy a stellar reputation in the world of online brokerage, each earning a perfect Trust Score of 99 from ForexBrokers.com. This high rating affirms that both companies are considered highly trusted. Founded in 1974, IG is not only publicly traded but also operates as a bank. Similarly, Charles Schwab, established a bit earlier in 1971, holds a publicly-traded status and functions as a bank. These factors contribute to their reliability and trustworthiness in managing financial transactions and investments.
When it comes to regulatory credentials, IG holds a distinct edge with 8 Tier-1 licenses, which are considered highly trusted according to ForexBrokers.com. In addition, IG possesses 2 Tier-2 licenses, indicating a strong regulatory standing. On the other hand, Charles Schwab holds 5 Tier-1 licenses but does not have any Tier-2 licenses. Both brokers have taken considerable strides to establish themselves as secure platforms for trading and investing, yet IG's additional licenses might appeal to customers who prioritize regulatory oversight and safety.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 1974 | 1971 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | Yes | Yes |
| Bank | Yes | Yes |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 8 | 5 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 2 | 0 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 1 | 0 |
IG earns a 5-star rating and ranks #6 out of 36 brokers for commissions and fees. It is not a discount broker, but it does offer competitive pricing for active traders, especially through its Forex Direct DMA account. In July 2023, IG’s average EUR/USD spread was 0.62 pips, which worked out to about 0.82 pips all-in after commission. Its CFD pricing was also fairly tight, with average spreads of 0.69 pips during the main trading session and 0.98 pips across the full day. For very high-volume traders, IG also offers rebate programs that can lower trading costs even further.
Charles Schwab earns a 4-star rating and ranks #25 out of 36 brokers for commissions and fees. Schwab does not charge a direct forex commission, so costs come from the spread instead. In October 2024, its average EUR/USD spread was 1.35 pips, which is on the higher side compared with many forex brokers. That said, Schwab has no minimum deposit for its main brokerage accounts, and traders can use thinkorswim through Schwab One. Schwab Global is also available for trading international markets in local currencies, though currency conversion fees may apply.
Overall, IG is the stronger choice on commissions and fees if your main goal is lower forex trading costs, especially for active or high-volume trading. Schwab is simpler for investors who want access to forex alongside a broader brokerage relationship, but its spread-based pricing is generally less competitive for currency trading.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | £1 | $0 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Spread-only account | 0.91 | 1.27 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Raw spread account | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Non-wire bank transfer (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | No |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
IG and Charles Schwab both give traders access to forex as either a CFD or spot contract, and both also support buying exchange-traded securities on U.S. and international markets. Where they differ is in the size and type of choices available. Charles Schwab lists more total tradeable symbols overall, with about 40,000 compared with IG’s 19,537, while IG offers more forex pairs, with 97 versus Schwab’s 73. Both brokers also provide cryptocurrency CFDs, but only IG lets clients buy actual cryptocurrency, not just a CFD.
In terms of market range, both brokers earn 5 out of 5 stars for Range of Investments. On ForexBrokers.com, IG is ranked #4 out of 36 brokers in this category, while Charles Schwab is ranked #5. Neither broker offers copy trading, so investors looking for that feature will need to look elsewhere. Overall, IG may appeal to traders who want more forex pairs and direct crypto access, while Charles Schwab stands out for its larger total number of tradeable symbols.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 19537 | 40000 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 97 | 73 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | Yes | Yes |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | No |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | Yes | No |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
IG and Charles Schwab both give traders a strong mix of platform choices, including a proprietary platform, a web-based trading platform, and a Windows desktop download. Each broker also offers a free simulated trading account, so beginners can practice before using real money. Both platforms let you trade directly from a chart, which can make order placement quicker and easier. In ForexBrokers.com’s Trading Platforms and Tools review, both IG and Charles Schwab earned 5 out of 5 stars.
Where IG stands out is support for MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5, which Charles Schwab does not offer. That may matter if you want access to more familiar third-party trading software or prefer the tools available in the MetaTrader ecosystem. Neither broker offers copy trading. Overall, IG is ranked #1 out of 36 brokers for trading platforms and tools, while Charles Schwab is ranked #7, making IG the stronger pick for traders who want more platform variety.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | Yes |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | No |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 33 | 374 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
IG and Charles Schwab both offer mobile trading apps for iPhone and Android, along with stock and forex price alerts, watchlist symbol syncing, trendline drawing, and auto-saving chart drawings. In other words, both apps cover the core tools most traders look for when managing an account on the go. Each broker also earns a 5-star rating for mobile trading apps, so both are strong choices for everyday mobile use.
The main difference is in charting depth. IG offers 33 technical studies in its mobile app, while Charles Schwab provides 374, giving Schwab a much wider set of chart analysis tools. Even so, IG ranks #1 out of 36 brokers for Mobile Trading Apps at ForexBrokers.com, compared with Charles Schwab’s #6 ranking, which shows that IG stands out for overall mobile app experience while Schwab offers more advanced charting options.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 33 | 374 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
IG and Charles Schwab both do well for market research, and each gives traders daily market commentary, forex news from top sources like Bloomberg, Reuters, and Dow Jones, plus an economic calendar with key global events. Both firms also earn 5 stars for Research, showing that each offers a strong set of tools and content for traders who want to stay informed.
Where IG stands out is in the extra research tools it provides. IG offers Autochartist, sentiment data that shows long and short positioning, TipRanks research, and Acuity Trading tools such as Signal Centre, while Charles Schwab does not offer these features. That difference helps explain why IG ranks #2 out of 36 brokers for Research, compared with Charles Schwab at #5.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | Yes |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes |
| Autochartist | Yes | No |
| Trading Central | No | No |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | No |
| TipRanks | Yes | No |
| Acuity Trading | Yes | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
When it comes to beginner learning tools, both IG and Charles Schwab give new traders plenty to work with. Each broker offers forex or CFD education with at least 10 learning pieces, along with monthly online webinars and at least 10 beginner videos focused on trading basics. They also both provide at least 10 advanced videos for more experienced traders, so learners can keep building skills as they gain confidence.
For education overall, both brokers earn top marks, with a 5-star rating from ForexBrokers.com. Charles Schwab edges out IG slightly in the Education category, ranking #6 out of 36 brokers compared with IG’s #7. In simple terms, both are strong choices for beginners, but Schwab has a small lead in the overall education ranking.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that IG is better than Charles Schwab. IG finished with an overall rank of #1, while Charles Schwab finished with an overall rank of #6.
IG offers the ultimate comprehensive trading package, featuring excellent trading and research tools, industry-leading education, and an extensive range of tradeable markets.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 99 | 99 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Trading Fees |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
In cryptocurrency trading, IG lets you buy actual delivered crypto and trade cryptocurrency CFDs, while Charles Schwab does not support buying actual crypto but does offer cryptocurrency CFDs.
IG vs Charles Schwab: Both brokers support ACH/SEPA transfers and bank wire deposits and withdrawals, neither supports Skrill, and only IG offers PayPal (Charles Schwab does not).
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | IG | Charles Schwab | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 99 | 99 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | IG Review | Charles Schwab Review |
| Broker Screenshots | IG | Charles Schwab | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
| Regulation | IG | Charles Schwab | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 99 | 99 | |
| Year Founded | 1974 | 1971 | |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | Yes | Yes | |
| Bank | Yes | Yes | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | No | |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 8 | 5 | |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 2 | 0 | |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 1 | 0 |
| Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | IG | Charles Schwab | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (ASIC Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| Canada (CIRO Authorised) | No | Yes | |
| Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | Yes | |
| Japan (FSA Authorised) | Yes | ||
| Singapore (MAS Authorised) | Yes | Yes | |
| Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | Yes | ||
| United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | Yes | Yes | |
| USA (CFTC Authorized) | Yes | Yes | |
| New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | Yes | ||
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | No |
| Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | IG | Charles Schwab | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya (CMA Authorised) | |||
| Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | ||
| South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | Yes | ||
| UAE (DFSA, FSRA, or CMA Authorised) | Yes | ||
| India (SEBI Authorised) | No | ||
| Jordan (JSC Authorised) |
| Investments | IG | Charles Schwab | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 19537 | 40000 | |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 97 | 73 | |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | Yes | Yes | |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | No | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | Yes | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
| Cost | IG | Charles Schwab | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Spread-only account | 0.91 | 1.27 | |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Raw spread account | 0.82 | 1.27 | |
| Inactivity Fee | Yes | No | |
| Order execution: Agency | Yes | Yes | |
| Order execution: Market Maker | Yes | No |
| Funding | IG | Charles Schwab | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | £1 | $0 | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | No | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| Non-wire bank transfer (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | IG | Charles Schwab | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | Yes | |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | No | No | |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No | |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No | |
| cTrader | No | No |
| Trading Tools | IG | Charles Schwab | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
| Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 33 | 374 | |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
| Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Trading | IG | Charles Schwab | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 33 | 374 | |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Research - Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Research | IG | Charles Schwab | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | Yes | |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes | |
| Autochartist | Yes | No | |
| Trading Central | No | No | |
| TipRanks | Yes | No | |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | No | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Education | IG | Charles Schwab | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | Yes | Yes | |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Major Forex Pairs | IG | Charles Schwab | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| Review | IG Review | Charles Schwab Review |
| Overall | IG | Charles Schwab | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 99 | 99 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | IG Review | Charles Schwab Review |