Written by ForexBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of Trading 212 vs FXOpen, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Trading 212 and FXOpen are both established online brokers, with Trading 212 founded in 2004 and FXOpen a year earlier in 2003. Neither company is publicly traded nor operates as a bank. In terms of trust and regulatory standing, both brokers are noteworthy, but Trading 212 holds a slight edge. Trading 212 boasts three Tier-1 licenses, showcasing its high level of credibility, while FXOpen holds two such licenses. These Tier-1 licenses are indicators of higher trust levels in the industry, meaning both brokers are reliable, but Trading 212 is slightly more so based on these credentials.
The ForexBrokers.com Trust Score further reflects this distinction. Trading 212 has achieved a rating of 80, placing it in the "trusted" category, indicating a secure and reliable choice for traders. Conversely, FXOpen has a Trust Score of 76, which ranks it as an "average risk" broker. While both brokers are relatively secure options, these scores highlight the marginal advantage Trading 212 holds in terms of investor trust and safety, making it a slightly more appealing choice for those prioritizing security and regulatory compliance.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
FXOpen
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2004 | 2003 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 2 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
Comparing commissions and fees, both Trading 212 and FXOpen earn 4 out of 5 stars, yet FXOpen ranks slightly higher in this category (#45 of 63) than Trading 212 (#50 of 63), according to ForexBrokers.com. That said, how each broker prices trades can feel different in practice, especially around spreads and transparency.
Trading 212 promotes zero-commission trading on its CFD account (minimum deposit: 10 euros), but you still pay the spread on each trade. The broker has started publishing average spread data, and for April 2025 its EUR/USD average was 2.7 pips—much higher than the industry average—meaning costs can add up quickly for frequent forex and CFD traders.
FXOpen’s average spread data isn’t available, which makes a direct apples-to-apples cost comparison difficult. Still, its 4-star rating and slightly better ranking in the Commissions and Fees category suggest it placed ahead of Trading 212 in that specific review. Without published averages, prospective traders should check live spreads, any per-trade commissions, and overnight financing to gauge real trading costs.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
FXOpen
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | €1 | $100 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 2.7 | N/A |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 2.7 | N/A |
| Non-wire bank transfer | Yes | No |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
Trading 212 vs FXOpen: for range of investments, Trading 212 offers far more choice. Trading 212 lists 7,868 tradeable symbols and 146 forex pairs, while FXOpen provides 87 symbols and 25 forex pairs. Both online brokers support forex trading via CFDs or spot, and both offer cryptocurrency CFDs (but not actual crypto). A major difference is stock access: Trading 212 lets you buy exchange-traded shares on U.S. markets (for example, Apple) and on international exchanges (for example, Vodafone), whereas FXOpen does not offer exchange-traded stocks.
FXOpen does have copy trading, which Trading 212 lacks. However, for sheer variety, Trading 212 earns 5 out of 5 stars for Range of Investments and ranks #16 out of 63 brokers on ForexBrokers.com, compared with FXOpen’s 3 out of 5 stars and #63 ranking. If you want a wide catalog with U.S. and international shares alongside CFDs and forex, Trading 212 is the stronger pick; if copy trading is your priority, FXOpen may appeal.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
FXOpen
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 7868 | 87 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 146 | 25 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | Yes | No |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | No |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | No |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
Comparing Trading 212 vs FXOpen for trading platforms and tools: both brokers provide a free demo (paper) account, web-based trading, and the ability to place trades directly from charts. Trading 212 uses its own in-house platform and does not offer a Windows desktop download. FXOpen does not have a proprietary platform, but it supports MetaTrader 4 (MT4) and MetaTrader 5 (MT5) with a Windows desktop option, plus copy trading—features that Trading 212 does not offer.
Both brokers earn 4 stars for Platforms and Tools, yet their category rankings differ: Trading 212 sits at #20 out of 63 brokers on ForexBrokers.com, while FXOpen is #54. Pick Trading 212 if you prefer a streamlined, broker-built web experience with chart trading and a demo account. Choose FXOpen if you want MT4/MT5, a Windows desktop platform, and copy trading alongside web access and chart trading.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
FXOpen
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | No |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | No | Yes |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | No | Yes |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | Yes |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 54 | 30 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
Both Trading 212 and FXOpen offer mobile trading apps for iPhone and Android. Each app supports price alerts and lets you draw trendlines on charts, making it easy to track moves and mark up setups on the go.
The differences show up in features and rankings. Trading 212 syncs watchlists between mobile and web (FXOpen does not), includes 104 technical indicators in its mobile charts (vs. 30 for FXOpen), and auto-saves chart drawings (FXOpen does not). While both apps hold 4-star ratings, ForexBrokers.com ranks Trading 212 higher at #17 out of 63 brokers, compared with FXOpen at #55.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
FXOpen
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | No |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 104 | 30 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | No |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
Comparing market research at Trading 212 vs FXOpen: FXOpen publishes daily market commentary, while Trading 212 does not. Both brokers deliver forex news from top-tier sources (such as Bloomberg, Reuters, or Dow Jones) and include an economic calendar to track key events. In independent testing, Trading 212 earned 3.5 stars and ranked 45th for Research on ForexBrokers.com, whereas FXOpen scored 3 stars and placed 64th.
Tool availability also differs. Neither broker offers Autochartist or Trading Central. Trading 212 stands out with a sentiment-based tool showing the ratio of long and short positions; FXOpen lacks an equivalent feature. TipRanks research is not available at Trading 212, and FXOpen does not list TipRanks or Acuity Trading (Signal Centre) integrations. If you want daily commentary, FXOpen has it; if you prefer a built-in sentiment readout alongside top-tier news and an economic calendar, Trading 212 is the better fit.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
FXOpen
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | No | Yes |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes |
| Autochartist | No | No |
| Trading Central | No | No |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | No |
| TipRanks | No | |
| Acuity Trading | No | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
For beginners comparing Trading 212 vs FXOpen, the key difference is video education. Trading 212 offers a sizable library with at least 10 beginner-friendly videos and 10 more for advanced topics, helping you progress from the basics to more complex ideas. FXOpen doesn’t meet that volume for either beginner or advanced videos. Neither broker hosts monthly client webinars, so live, ongoing classes aren’t part of the experience with either option.
These gaps show up in independent ratings: Trading 212 earns 3.5 out of 5 stars for Education and ranks #21 of 63 brokers at ForexBrokers.com, while FXOpen scores 3 stars and ranks #59. If easy-to-follow video lessons are your priority as a new trader, Trading 212 is the stronger fit; if you want frequent live webinars, you’ll need to consider other brokers.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
FXOpen
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | No |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | No |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | No |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that Trading 212 is better than FXOpen. Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #31, while FXOpen finished with an overall rank of #54.
Best known for its mobile trading app, Trading 212 offers an easy-to-use trading platform suite for CFD and share trading, as well as a large variety of forex pairs. However, despite its well-designed platform and wide range of symbols, its lack of advanced trading tools and flat research offerings hamper Trading 212’s bid to be considered a top broker.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
FXOpen
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 80 | 76 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Commissions & Fees |
|
|
| Platforms & Tools |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
Comparing online brokers Trading 212 vs FXOpen: neither supports buying actual (delivered) cryptocurrency, but both allow you to buy cryptocurrency CFDs.
Compared with FXOpen, which does not support ACH or SEPA transfers (other funding options not specified), Trading 212 supports deposits and withdrawals via ACH/SEPA, PayPal, and bank wire (but not Skrill), with Visa/Mastercard availability not specified for either broker.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | Trading 212 | FXOpen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Commissions & Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Platforms & Tools |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 80 | 76 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Broker Screenshots | Trading 212 | FXOpen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
|
| Regulation | Trading 212 | FXOpen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 80 | 76 | |
| Year Founded | 2004 | 2003 | |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No | |
| Bank | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes | |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 2 | |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | Trading 212 | FXOpen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (ASIC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Canada (CIRO Authorised) | No | No | |
| Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Japan (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Singapore (MAS Authorised) | No | No | |
| Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | |||
| United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | Yes | Yes | |
| USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | No | |
| New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes |
| Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | Trading 212 | FXOpen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya (CMA Authorised) | |||
| Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | No | |
| South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | No | No | |
| UAE (DFSA, FSRA, or SCA Authorised) | No | No | |
| India (SEBI Authorised) | No | No | |
| Jordan (JSC Authorised) |
| Investments | Trading 212 | FXOpen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 7868 | 87 | |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 146 | 25 | |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | Yes | No | |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | No | |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes | |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
| Cost | Trading 212 | FXOpen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 2.7 | N/A | |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 2.7 | N/A | |
| Inactivity Fee | No | Yes | |
| Order execution: Agency | Yes | Yes | |
| Order execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
| Funding | Trading 212 | FXOpen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | €1 | $100 | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | ||
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | ||
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | ||
| Non-wire bank transfer | Yes | No |
| Trading Platforms | Trading 212 | FXOpen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | No | |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | No | Yes | |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes | |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | No | Yes | |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | Yes | |
| cTrader | No | No |
| Trading Tools | Trading 212 | FXOpen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
| Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 54 | 30 | |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
| Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Trading | Trading 212 | FXOpen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Watchlist [DELETED] | |||
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | No | |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 104 | 30 | |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | No | |
| Mobile Research - Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Research | Trading 212 | FXOpen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | No | Yes | |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes | |
| Autochartist | No | No | |
| Trading Central | No | No | |
| TipRanks | No | ||
| Client sentiment data | Yes | No | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Education | Trading 212 | FXOpen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | No | |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | No | |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | No |
| Major Forex Pairs | Trading 212 | FXOpen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GBP/USD [DELETED] | |||
| USD/JPY [DELETED] | |||
| EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/CHF [DELETED] | |||
| USD/CAD [DELETED] | |||
| NZD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| AUD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Overall | Trading 212 | FXOpen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Commissions & Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Platforms & Tools |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 80 | 76 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Trading 212 Review |
IG
CMC Markets
FOREX.com
XTB
eToro
AvaTrade
Plus500
Pepperstone
FP Markets
Tickmill