Trading 212 vs Moneta Markets 2025
In this head to head comparison of Trading 212 vs Moneta Markets, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
In this head to head comparison of Trading 212 vs Moneta Markets, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
When comparing Trading 212 and Moneta Markets, it's important to consider their regulatory backgrounds and trust ratings, especially for those interested in the credibility of online brokers. Trading 212, established in 2004, holds three Tier-1 licenses, making it highly trusted according to ForexBrokers.com's rating system. In contrast, Moneta Markets, which began operation in 2009, has no Tier-1 licenses. However, it does possess one Tier-2 license, which still indicates trust. Neither company is publicly traded nor operates as a bank.
For those concerned with trustworthiness, Trading 212 carries a Trust Score of 80, suggesting a reputable status as a trusted broker. Moneta Markets, with a Trust Score of 71, represents an average risk profile in comparison. While both platforms serve as viable options depending on individual needs and preferences, Trading 212's multiple Tier-1 licenses position it as a more trusted choice for users prioritizing regulatory compliance and trustworthiness.
Feature |
|
|
---|---|---|
Year Founded | 2004 | 2009 |
Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
Bank | No | No |
Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 0 |
Tier-2 Licenses | 0 | 1 |
Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 1 |
When comparing commissions and fees, Trading 212 offers zero-commission trading through its Invest and CFD accounts. The Invest account requires a minimum deposit of 1 euro, while the CFD account requires 10 euros. However, Trading 212's spreads, such as the 2.7 pips average for the EUR/USD pair in April 2025, are notably higher than industry averages. This aspect may detract from its appeal to budget-conscious traders, as the wider spreads translate to higher trading costs despite the absence of direct commissions. Trading 212 secures a 4-star rating for its commissions and fees but stands at a lower ranking of #49 among 63 brokers on ForexBrokers.com.
Moneta Markets, on the other hand, offers three types of accounts with varying fee structures: the commission-free Direct STP account and two commission-based accounts, Prime ECN and Ultra ECN. The Direct STP account has higher spreads, averaging 1.38 pips for the EUR/USD pair as of August 2023. While the Prime ECN account, with a commission of $6 per round-trip standard lot, maintains a lower total cost of roughly 0.79 pips, the Ultra ECN offers even tighter spreads and a $2 commission per round-trip for deposits of $20,000 or more. With these competitive offerings, Moneta Markets achieves a 4.5-star rating for commissions and fees and a high ranking of #16 among 63 brokers according to ForexBrokers.com.
In summary, while Trading 212 may attract traders with its zero-commission offering, the higher spreads could reduce cost efficiency. Conversely, Moneta Markets provides more account options that cater to both commission-free trading with wider spreads and low-cost commission-based trading. The varied account structures of Moneta Markets present better overall cost advantages, evidenced by both their higher star rating and ranking compared to Trading 212.
Feature |
|
|
---|---|---|
Minimum Deposit | €1 | $50 |
Average Spread EUR/USD - Standard | 2.7 | 1.38 |
All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 2.7 | 0.79 |
Active Trader or VIP Discounts | No | No |
ACH or SEPA Transfers | Yes | No |
PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | No |
Visa/Mastercard (Credit/Debit) | Yes | Yes |
Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
When it comes to choosing between Trading 212 and Moneta Markets for investment options, there are clear distinctions in their offerings. Trading 212 stands out with a remarkable selection of 7,868 tradeable symbols, significantly eclipsing Moneta Markets' 1,016 symbols. In terms of forex trading, Trading 212 provides access to 146 pairs, which is over triple the 45 forex pairs offered by Moneta Markets. Furthermore, Trading 212 allows investors to purchase exchange-traded securities from both U.S. and international exchanges, offering broader access to stocks such as Apple and Vodafone. By comparison, Moneta Markets lacks this capability, focusing solely on CFD trading.
In addition to their vast array of investments, Trading 212 and Moneta Markets both support trading in cryptocurrency derivatives but do not offer actual cryptocurrency purchases. While Moneta Markets provides the option for copy trading, Trading 212 does not. With its extensive range of investments, Trading 212 earns a perfect 5-star rating and is ranked 15th among 63 brokers by ForexBrokers.com for its range of investments. Conversely, Moneta Markets is rated 4 stars and ranks 35th, reflecting a narrower selection compared to its counterpart. Overall, both platforms offer unique features, but Trading 212's wide spectrum of investment options may appeal more to investors seeking diversity.
Feature |
|
|
---|---|---|
Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 7868 | 1016 |
Forex Pairs (Total) | 146 | 45 |
U.S. Stock Trading (Non CFD) | Yes | No |
Int'l Stock Trading (Non CFD) | Yes | No |
Social Trading / Copy Trading | No | Yes |
Cryptocurrency (Physical) | No | No |
Cryptocurrency (Derivative) | Yes | Yes |
Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
Trading 212 and Moneta Markets both provide traders the opportunity to practice their skills with simulated trading through free virtual demo accounts. However, when it comes to platforms, Trading 212 offers a proprietary, browser-based trading experience, but lacks a Windows-based desktop application. Moneta Markets, on the other hand, does not have a proprietary platform, but shines with its Windows-based desktop option while also being accessible via a web platform. Traders using Trading 212 might miss the advanced features offered by MetaTrader 4 and 5, as Moneta Markets supports both along with DupliTrade and copy trading capabilities, providing more options for automated and social trading.
For those interested in charting tools, Moneta Markets offers a more extensive set with 78 drawing tools compared to Trading 212's 20, though both allow trading directly from a chart. Watchlist customization offers a slight edge to Trading 212 with five columns to Moneta Markets' four. Despite these differences, both brokers receive a four-star rating for trading platforms and tools, though Trading 212 ranks higher at #20 compared to Moneta Markets' #33 according to ForexBrokers.com. This comprehensive view suggests that while Moneta Markets offers more external trading plugins and customization, Trading 212 appeals to those who appreciate an in-house platform and a straightforward web-based interface.
Feature |
|
|
---|---|---|
Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
Proprietary Platform | Yes | No |
Desktop Platform (Windows) | No | Yes |
Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
Social Trading / Copy Trading | No | Yes |
MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | No | Yes |
MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | Yes |
DupliTrade | No | Yes |
ZuluTrade | No | No |
Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 54 | 105 |
Charting - Drawing Tools (Total) | 20 | 78 |
Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Watchlists - Total Fields | 5 | 4 |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
Both Trading 212 and Moneta Markets have developed user-friendly mobile apps available for both iPhone and Android users. These apps offer essential features such as stock and forex price alerts, watchlist symbol syncing, and real-time quote watchlists. They also support charting functionalities, allowing users to draw trend lines and view multiple time frames, with all chart drawings auto-saved for convenience. While both apps are rated four stars for their mobile trading experience, Trading 212 stands out by offering over 100 technical studies for its charting capabilities, while Moneta Markets provides 30. This difference in technical analysis tools is a key factor for those who prioritize in-depth charting in their trading strategy.
In the competitive landscape of mobile trading apps, Trading 212 and Moneta Markets both earn respectable rankings, yet Trading 212 holds a higher position at #17 compared to Moneta Markets' #35 according to ForexBrokers.com. This ranking reflects Trading 212's more comprehensive feature set and potentially greater satisfaction among users. However, both brokers maintain a solid reputation with equivalent star ratings, making them viable options for traders who value functionality, accessibility, and a reliable trading experience on the go.
Feature |
|
|
---|---|---|
Android App | Yes | Yes |
Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
Mobile Alerts - Basic Fields | Yes | Yes |
Watchlist Syncing | Yes | Yes |
Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 104 | 30 |
Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
Mobile Charting - Multiple Time Frames | Yes | Yes |
Mobile Charting - Drawings Autosave | Yes | Yes |
Mobile Watchlist | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
When comparing Trading 212 and Moneta Markets based on their market research features, both platforms provide forex news from esteemed sources like Bloomberg and Reuters, ensuring traders have access to reliable information. However, Moneta Markets offers daily market commentary, providing insights to its users that Trading 212 does not. Both brokers have sentiment-based trading tools that display ratios of long or short positions across various instruments, helping traders make more informed decisions in the forex market. While neither broker incorporates tools from Acuity Trading, Trading 212 does include an economic calendar to keep users informed about global news events, which is also available through Moneta Markets.
Regarding technical analysis, Moneta Markets takes the lead with tools from Trading Central, unlike Trading 212, which lacks any offerings from Trading Central or Autochartist. This gives Moneta Markets an edge in providing more comprehensive analysis for its users. Rated 4 stars for research by ForexBrokers.com, Moneta Markets ranks 32nd among 63 brokers. In contrast, Trading 212, with a 3.5-star rating, holds the 44th spot. This suggests that Moneta Markets may be a preferable choice for traders prioritizing research capabilities.
Feature |
|
|
---|---|---|
Daily Market Commentary | No | Yes |
Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes |
Autochartist | No | No |
Trading Central (Recognia) | No | Yes |
Social Sentiment - Currency Pairs | Yes | Yes |
TipRanks | No | No |
Signal Centre (Acuity Trading) | No | No |
Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
When it comes to educational resources for beginners, Trading 212 and Moneta Markets both offer a good start with over ten forex or CFDs educational materials like articles and videos. Both brokers provide searchable archives of previously recorded webinars, and each has more than ten beginner-friendly videos covering trading basics. However, neither of them hosts regular live educational webinars for clients. In addition to beginner resources, both Trading 212 and Moneta Markets also cater to more advanced traders with at least ten dedicated educational videos. Complementing their learning offerings, each broker provides an investor dictionary covering over fifty key investing terms, aiding newcomers in understanding trading jargon.
In terms of quality ratings, Moneta Markets edges out Trading 212 slightly with a four-star rating compared to Trading 212's 3.5 stars. However, in the overall education category of ForexBrokers.com's rankings, Trading 212 secures a higher position at #20, while Moneta Markets is placed at #33 out of 63 brokers. Despite the slight variations in ratings and rankings, both platforms deliver beneficial resources to support traders as they embark on their trading journeys. Whether a beginner or a seasoned trader, users will likely find their educational offerings valuable.
Feature |
|
|
---|---|---|
Education (Forex or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
Client Webinars | No | No |
Client Webinars (Archived) | Yes | Yes |
Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Investor Dictionary (Glossary) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that Trading 212 is better than Moneta Markets. Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #31, while Moneta Markets finished with an overall rank of #35.
Best known for its mobile trading app, Trading 212 offers an easy-to-use trading platform suite for CFD and share trading, as well as a large variety of forex pairs. However, despite its well-designed platform and wide range of symbols, its lack of advanced trading tools and flat research offerings hamper Trading 212’s bid to be considered a top broker.
Feature |
|
|
---|---|---|
Overall Rating |
|
|
Trust Score | 80 | 71 |
Range of Investments |
|
|
Commissions & Fees |
|
|
Platforms & Tools |
|
|
Research |
|
|
Mobile Trading |
|
|
Education |
|
|
Both Trading 212 and Moneta Markets do not provide the option to buy actual delivered cryptocurrencies but do offer the ability to trade cryptocurrency derivatives.
When comparing Trading 212 and Moneta Markets for deposit and withdrawal options, Trading 212 stands out by offering ACH and SEPA transfers as well as PayPal, alongside Visa/Mastercard and bank wires, whereas Moneta Markets provides Visa/Mastercard and bank wire options but lacks support for ACH, SEPA, PayPal, and Skrill, with both platforms not offering Skrill.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5Overall Rating | Trading 212 | Moneta Markets | |
---|---|---|---|
Overall Rating |
|
| |
Commissions & Fees |
|
| |
Range of Investments |
|
| |
Platforms & Tools |
|
| |
Mobile Trading |
|
| |
Research |
|
| |
Education |
|
| |
Trust Score | 80 | 71 | |
Winner | check_circle | ||
Review | Trading 212 Review | Moneta Markets Review |
Broker Screenshots | Trading 212 | Moneta Markets | |
---|---|---|---|
Trading Platforms Gallery (click to expand) | |||
Mobile Trading Gallery (click to expand) | |||
Research Gallery (click to expand) | |||
Education Gallery (click to expand) |
Regulation | Trading 212 | Moneta Markets | |
---|---|---|---|
Trust Score | 80 | 71 | |
Year Founded | 2004 | 2009 | |
Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No | |
Bank | No | No | |
Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | No | |
Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 0 | |
Tier-2 Licenses | 0 | 1 | |
Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 1 |
Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | Trading 212 | Moneta Markets | |
---|---|---|---|
Australia (ASIC Authorised) | No | No | |
Canada (CIRO Authorised) | No | No | |
Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
Japan (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
Singapore (MAS Authorised) | No | No | |
Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | No | No | |
United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | No | |
New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | No | |
Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | No |
Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | Trading 212 | Moneta Markets | |
---|---|---|---|
Kenya (CMA Authorised) | No | No | |
Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | No | |
South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | No | Yes | |
UAE (DFSA/Central Bank Authorised) | No | No | |
India (SEBI Authorised) | No | No | |
Jordan (JSC Authorised) | No | No |
Investments | Trading 212 | Moneta Markets | |
---|---|---|---|
Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 7868 | 1016 | |
Forex Pairs (Total) | 146 | 45 | |
U.S. Stock Trading (Non CFD) | Yes | No | |
Int'l Stock Trading (Non CFD) | Yes | No | |
Social Trading / Copy Trading | No | Yes | |
Cryptocurrency (Physical) | No | No | |
Cryptocurrency (Derivative) | Yes | Yes | |
Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Cost | Trading 212 | Moneta Markets | |
---|---|---|---|
Average Spread EUR/USD - Standard | 2.7 | 1.38 | |
All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 2.7 | 0.79 | |
Active Trader or VIP Discounts | No | No | |
Inactivity Fee | No | No | |
Execution: Agency Broker | Yes | No | |
Execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
Funding | Trading 212 | Moneta Markets | |
---|---|---|---|
Minimum Deposit | €1 | $50 | |
PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | No | |
Visa/Mastercard (Credit/Debit) | Yes | Yes | |
Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
ACH or SEPA Transfers | Yes | No |
Trading Platforms | Trading 212 | Moneta Markets | |
---|---|---|---|
Proprietary Platform | Yes | No | |
Desktop Platform (Windows) | No | Yes | |
Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
Social Trading / Copy Trading | No | Yes | |
MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | No | Yes | |
MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | Yes | |
cTrader | No | No | |
DupliTrade | No | Yes | |
ZuluTrade | No | No |
Trading Tools | Trading 212 | Moneta Markets | |
---|---|---|---|
Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
Alerts - Basic Fields | Yes | Yes | |
Watchlists - Total Fields | 5 | 4 | |
Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 54 | 105 | |
Charting - Drawing Tools (Total) | 20 | 78 | |
Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
Mobile Trading | Trading 212 | Moneta Markets | |
---|---|---|---|
Android App | Yes | Yes | |
Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
Mobile Alerts - Basic Fields | Yes | Yes | |
Mobile Watchlist | Yes | Yes | |
Watchlist Syncing | Yes | Yes | |
Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 104 | 30 | |
Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
Mobile Charting - Multiple Time Frames | Yes | Yes | |
Mobile Charting - Drawings Autosave | Yes | Yes | |
Mobile Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Research | Trading 212 | Moneta Markets | |
---|---|---|---|
Daily Market Commentary | No | Yes | |
Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes | |
Autochartist | No | No | |
Trading Central (Recognia) | No | Yes | |
TipRanks | No | No | |
Social Sentiment - Currency Pairs | Yes | Yes | |
Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Education | Trading 212 | Moneta Markets | |
---|---|---|---|
Education (Forex or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
Client Webinars | No | No | |
Client Webinars (Archived) | Yes | Yes | |
Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
Investor Dictionary (Glossary) | Yes | Yes |
Major Forex Pairs | Trading 212 | Moneta Markets | |
---|---|---|---|
GBP/USD | Yes | Yes | |
USD/JPY | Yes | Yes | |
EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
USD/CHF | Yes | Yes | |
USD/CAD | Yes | Yes | |
NZD/USD | Yes | Yes | |
AUD/USD | Yes | Yes | |
Review | Trading 212 Review | Moneta Markets Review |
Overall | Trading 212 | Moneta Markets | |
---|---|---|---|
Overall Rating |
|
| |
Commissions & Fees |
|
| |
Range of Investments |
|
| |
Platforms & Tools |
|
| |
Mobile Trading |
|
| |
Research |
|
| |
Education |
|
| |
Trust Score | 80 | 71 | |
Winner | check_circle | ||
Review | Trading 212 Review | Moneta Markets Review |