Written by ForexBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of Trading 212 vs RoboForex, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Trading 212 and RoboForex cater to online traders, each holding distinct positions in the regulatory landscape. Founded in 2004, Trading 212 holds three Tier-1 licenses, underscoring a strong foundation of trust according to ForexBrokers.com ratings. Meanwhile, RoboForex, established in 2009, supports its operations with one Tier-1 license. Neither broker is listed on a stock exchange or operates as a bank, offering services free from these affiliations.
Understanding their trustworthiness, Trading 212 garners a trusted ForexBrokers.com Trust Score of 80, while RoboForex scores a slightly lower 73, reflecting an average risk category. This comparison provides potential investors with a clearer view of each broker's regulatory standing, assisting in making informed decisions based on trust ratings and licenses held. Both platforms offer various trading services, but their regulatory differences should be a consideration for any potential user.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
RoboForex
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2004 | 2009 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 1 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 2 |
Trading 212’s commissions and fees for its CFD account are built into the spread. The broker advertises zero-commission trading, but you still pay the bid/ask spread when trading CFDs and forex. In April 2025, Trading 212’s published average spread for EUR/USD was 2.7 pips, which is above the industry average and makes it less price-competitive for frequent forex trades. The CFD account’s minimum deposit is €10. Commissions and fees rating: 4/5 stars; ranked #50 of 63 by ForexBrokers.com.
RoboForex prices its Procent and Pro accounts via spreads, with an average EUR/USD spread of 1.3 pips, which is considered high for those account types. Commissions and fees rating: 3.5/5 stars; ranked #56 of 63 by ForexBrokers.com.
Side by side, RoboForex’s quoted 1.3‑pip EUR/USD spread is narrower than Trading 212’s 2.7‑pip figure, so based on spreads alone RoboForex may be cheaper on that pair. Still, both trail the lowest-cost leaders on EUR/USD. Overall, ForexBrokers.com scores Trading 212 higher for commissions and fees (4 stars, #50) than RoboForex (3.5 stars, #56). Keep in mind that “zero-commission” offers rely on spreads, and consider your account type and the markets you plan to trade.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
RoboForex
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | €1 | $100 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 2.7 | 1.3 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 2.7 | N/A |
| Non-wire bank transfer | Yes | Yes |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
Trading 212 vs RoboForex on range of investments: both brokers support forex trading (CFD/spot). RoboForex lists slightly more total instruments (8,400) than Trading 212 (7,868), but Trading 212 offers far more forex pairs (146 vs 28). If you want real, exchange-traded shares, Trading 212 lets you buy U.S. and international stocks directly (think Apple or Vodafone), while RoboForex focuses on derivatives and does not provide real share dealing. Both brokers offer cryptocurrency via CFDs, and neither lets you buy and hold actual coins.
Independent ratings reflect these differences: for Range of Investments, Trading 212 earns 5 stars and ranks 16th out of 63 brokers on ForexBrokers.com, while RoboForex scores 4.5 stars and ranks 21st. Choose Trading 212 if direct stock ownership and a wide choice of forex pairs matter most. Pick RoboForex if you value a large overall symbol list and want copy trading, which it supports and Trading 212 does not.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
RoboForex
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 7868 | 8400 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 146 | 28 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | Yes | No |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | No |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | No |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
When comparing trading platforms and tools, Trading 212 and RoboForex both offer free demo accounts and web-based platforms, along with the ability to place trades directly from charts. Trading 212 stands out with its own in-house platform but does not provide a Windows desktop download, MetaTrader 4 (MT4), or MetaTrader 5 (MT5), and it doesn’t support copy trading. RoboForex, on the other hand, does not have a proprietary platform but does offer a Windows desktop platform, supports both MT4 and MT5, and includes copy trading—appealing if you want established third-party software and social trading features.
Details on the number of built-in technical indicators and watchlist columns weren’t specified for either broker. Both earned 4 stars for Trading Platforms and Tools, yet their rankings differ: Trading 212 is ranked #20 out of 63 brokers by ForexBrokers.com for this category, while RoboForex sits at #44. In short, choose Trading 212 if you prefer a clean, broker-built web experience; choose RoboForex if you want desktop access, MetaTrader support, and copy trading options.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
RoboForex
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | No |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | No | Yes |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | No | Yes |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | Yes |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 54 | 30 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
Both Trading 212 and RoboForex offer mobile trading apps for iPhone and Android, complete with price alerts, drawing tools like trendlines, and auto-saving of chart annotations. Each app holds a 4-star rating for mobile trading, making them solid choices for on-the-go investors and traders who want dependable access to markets.
The key differences show up in charting and account syncing. Trading 212 packs 104 technical indicators versus 30 at RoboForex, and it syncs your watchlists between the mobile app and your online account, while RoboForex does not. That depth and convenience help explain their ForexBrokers.com rankings: Trading 212 sits at #17 out of 63 brokers for Mobile Trading Apps, compared with RoboForex at #44. If you value richer charting and seamless watchlist syncing, Trading 212 is the stronger fit; if you just need the essentials with alerts and basic drawing tools, RoboForex will do the job.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
RoboForex
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | No |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 104 | 30 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
Trading 212 and RoboForex both cover the basics for market research: top-tier forex news (from sources like Bloomberg/Reuters) and an economic calendar. Beyond that, they differ. RoboForex publishes daily market commentary and adds third-party tools such as Trading Central and Acuity Trading (Signal Centre). Trading 212 skips those, but it does include a sentiment tool that shows the share of long vs. short positions; RoboForex does not. Neither broker offers Autochartist or TipRanks.
In independent ratings, both earned 3.5 out of 5 stars for research, though RoboForex ranks higher (#38 of 63) than Trading 212 (#45) at ForexBrokers.com. Pick RoboForex if you want daily insights and extra analytics; choose Trading 212 if a built-in sentiment readout matters more. Either way, you get headline news and a handy calendar at both brokers.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
RoboForex
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | No | Yes |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes |
| Autochartist | No | No |
| Trading Central | No | Yes |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | No |
| TipRanks | No | No |
| Acuity Trading | No | Yes |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
Beginner traders comparing Trading 212 vs RoboForex for education will find clearer on-ramps at Trading 212. Trading 212 provides at least 10 beginner-friendly videos that explain core forex and CFD concepts, and it also offers 10+ advanced videos for when you’re ready to go deeper. RoboForex does not meet those thresholds, and neither broker hosts monthly educational webinars.
Both Trading 212 and RoboForex earn 3.5 out of 5 stars for education, yet their standings differ: ForexBrokers.com ranks Trading 212 #21 of 63 brokers for Education, while RoboForex sits at #57. If you prefer self-paced video lessons with room to grow, Trading 212 has the edge; if live webinars are a must, note that neither brand currently runs them.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
RoboForex
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | No |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | No |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | No |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that Trading 212 is better than RoboForex. Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #31, while RoboForex finished with an overall rank of #46.
Best known for its mobile trading app, Trading 212 offers an easy-to-use trading platform suite for CFD and share trading, as well as a large variety of forex pairs. However, despite its well-designed platform and wide range of symbols, its lack of advanced trading tools and flat research offerings hamper Trading 212’s bid to be considered a top broker.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
RoboForex
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 80 | 73 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Commissions & Fees |
|
|
| Platforms & Tools |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
In a head-to-head comparison of online brokers, Trading 212 and RoboForex do not offer the ability to buy actual (delivered) cryptocurrency, but both provide cryptocurrency CFD trading.
Trading 212 vs RoboForex: both support ACH/SEPA transfers; Trading 212 also supports PayPal and bank wires but not Skrill, while RoboForex’s support for PayPal, Skrill, Visa/Mastercard, and bank wires—and Trading 212’s support for Visa/Mastercard—is not specified.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | Trading 212 | RoboForex | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Commissions & Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Platforms & Tools |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 80 | 73 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Trading 212 Review | RoboForex Review |
| Broker Screenshots | Trading 212 | RoboForex | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
|
| Regulation | Trading 212 | RoboForex | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 80 | 73 | |
| Year Founded | 2004 | 2009 | |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No | |
| Bank | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes | |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 1 | |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 2 |
| Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | Trading 212 | RoboForex | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (ASIC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Canada (CIRO Authorised) | No | No | |
| Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Japan (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Singapore (MAS Authorised) | No | No | |
| Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | |||
| United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | No | |
| New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes |
| Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | Trading 212 | RoboForex | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya (CMA Authorised) | |||
| Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | No | |
| South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | No | No | |
| UAE (DFSA, FSRA, or SCA Authorised) | No | No | |
| India (SEBI Authorised) | No | No | |
| Jordan (JSC Authorised) |
| Investments | Trading 212 | RoboForex | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 7868 | 8400 | |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 146 | 28 | |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | Yes | No | |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | No | |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes | |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
| Cost | Trading 212 | RoboForex | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 2.7 | 1.3 | |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 2.7 | N/A | |
| Inactivity Fee | No | Yes | |
| Order execution: Agency | Yes | Yes | |
| Order execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
| Funding | Trading 212 | RoboForex | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | €1 | $100 | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | ||
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | ||
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | ||
| Non-wire bank transfer | Yes | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | Trading 212 | RoboForex | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | No | |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | No | Yes | |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes | |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | No | Yes | |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | Yes | |
| cTrader | No | No |
| Trading Tools | Trading 212 | RoboForex | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
| Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 54 | 30 | |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
| Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Trading | Trading 212 | RoboForex | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Watchlist [DELETED] | |||
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | No | |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 104 | 30 | |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Research - Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Research | Trading 212 | RoboForex | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | No | Yes | |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes | |
| Autochartist | No | No | |
| Trading Central | No | Yes | |
| TipRanks | No | No | |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | No | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Education | Trading 212 | RoboForex | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | No | |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | No | |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | No |
| Major Forex Pairs | Trading 212 | RoboForex | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GBP/USD [DELETED] | |||
| USD/JPY [DELETED] | |||
| EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/CHF [DELETED] | |||
| USD/CAD [DELETED] | |||
| NZD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| AUD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| Review | Trading 212 Review | RoboForex Review |
| Overall | Trading 212 | RoboForex | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Commissions & Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Platforms & Tools |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 80 | 73 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Trading 212 Review | RoboForex Review |
IG
CMC Markets
FOREX.com
XTB
eToro
AvaTrade
Plus500
Pepperstone
FP Markets
Tickmill