Written by ForexBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of Trading 212 vs RoboForex, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Trading 212 and RoboForex cater to online traders, each holding distinct positions in the regulatory landscape. Founded in 2004, Trading 212 holds three Tier-1 licenses, underscoring a strong foundation of trust according to ForexBrokers.com ratings. Meanwhile, RoboForex, established in 2009, supports its operations with one Tier-1 license. Neither broker is listed on a stock exchange or operates as a bank, offering services free from these affiliations.
Understanding their trustworthiness, Trading 212 garners a trusted ForexBrokers.com Trust Score of 80, while RoboForex scores a slightly lower 73, reflecting an average risk category. This comparison provides potential investors with a clearer view of each broker's regulatory standing, assisting in making informed decisions based on trust ratings and licenses held. Both platforms offer various trading services, but their regulatory differences should be a consideration for any potential user.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
RoboForex
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2004 | 2009 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 1 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 2 |
Trading 212 and RoboForex are two popular choices for online trading, each with distinct approaches to commissions and fees. Trading 212 offers an Invest account for trading shares and a CFD account for CFDs, with the latter requiring a minimum deposit of 10 euros. While Trading 212 promises zero-commission trading, traders must account for the spread when trading CFDs and forex. As of April 2025, the average spread for the EUR/USD pair was 2.7 pips, higher than the industry norm. This affects Trading 212's appeal significantly and places it at a disadvantage against top CFD and forex brokers, earning it 4 out of 5 stars for commissions and fees from ForexBrokers.com and a ranking of 49th out of 63 brokers.
RoboForex, offering average spreads of 1.3 pips for the EUR/USD pair on its Procent and Pro accounts, also stands on the pricier side. Despite competitive offerings, its commission structure similarly impacts its overall attractiveness. RoboForex secures a slightly lower rating of 3.5 stars in the commissions and fees category, with a ranking of 55th among 63 brokers according to ForexBrokers.com. When comparing the two brokers, Trading 212 edges out RoboForex in fees, though its higher spreads remain a crucial consideration for potential users.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
RoboForex
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | €1 | $100 |
| Average Spread EUR/USD - Standard | 2.7 | 1.3 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 2.7 | N/A |
| Active Trader or VIP Discounts | No | Yes |
| ACH or SEPA Transfers | Yes | Yes |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | Yes |
| Visa/Mastercard (Credit/Debit) | Yes | Yes |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
Trading 212 and RoboForex both provide a wide array of investment options, catering to diverse trading preferences. While both brokers offer forex trading as CFDs or spot contracts, there is a noteworthy difference in the number of tradeable symbols they provide. Trading 212 offers 7,868 symbols, whereas RoboForex slightly edges ahead with 8,400. However, when it comes to forex pairs, Trading 212 stands out with an impressive selection of 146, greatly surpassing the 28 pairs available at RoboForex. Additionally, Trading 212 grants access to U.S. and international exchange-traded securities, allowing clients to buy shares from top markets such as Apple and Vodafone. In contrast, RoboForex does not provide this option, focusing instead on CFD offerings.
For those interested in cryptocurrency, both platforms permit trading in cryptocurrency derivatives rather than direct ownership of digital coins. A distinctive feature of RoboForex is its support for copy trading, a service not offered by Trading 212. Despite these differences, Trading 212 and RoboForex receive high praise for their range of investments. Trading 212 is rated 5 stars and ranks #15 out of 63 brokers in the Range of Investments category on ForexBrokers.com. RoboForex also earns a strong rating of 4.5 stars, securing the #20 spot. Each broker has its strengths, making them suitable choices depending on your trading goals and desired range of investment options.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
RoboForex
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 7868 | 8400 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 146 | 28 |
| U.S. Stock Trading (Non CFD) | Yes | No |
| Int'l Stock Trading (Non CFD) | Yes | No |
| Social Trading / Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| Cryptocurrency (Physical) | No | No |
| Cryptocurrency (Derivative) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
When it comes to trading platforms and tools, Trading 212 and RoboForex cater to different trader needs. Both brokers offer simulated trading with free virtual demo accounts, allowing users to practice without risking real money. Trading 212 boasts a proprietary platform, showcasing in-house development, while RoboForex relies on popular third-party options like MetaTrader 4 and 5, catering more to traders who prefer established software. Although Trading 212 does not offer a Windows-based desktop platform, both brokers provide web-based trading platforms, ensuring convenience for users preferring to trade directly in their browsers. For those interested in trade replication, RoboForex supports copy trading, a feature Trading 212 doesn't offer. Neither broker offers DupliTrade or ZuluTrade.
For users focusing on charting tools, Trading 212 provides 20 drawing tools compared to RoboForex's 15, while both allow trading directly from stock charts. RoboForex edges slightly ahead by offering more watch list columns, with seven compared to Trading 212's five. Despite their differences, both platforms earn a four-star rating for their tools and platforms, yet Trading 212 is ranked higher at #20 among 63 brokers, compared to RoboForex's #43 in ForexBrokers.com's rankings. This could indicate Trading 212's proprietary platform is well-received in terms of user satisfaction and versatility, even without the industry-standard MetaTrader options that RoboForex includes.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
RoboForex
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Platform | Yes | No |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | No | Yes |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Social Trading / Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | No | Yes |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | Yes |
| DupliTrade | No | No |
| ZuluTrade | No | No |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 54 | 30 |
| Charting - Drawing Tools (Total) | 20 | 15 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
| Watchlists - Total Fields | 5 | 7 |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
Both Trading 212 and RoboForex offer mobile apps that are compatible with iPhone and Android devices, ensuring you can trade on the go no matter your device. They both provide essential features like stock or forex price alerts and the ability to draw trendlines and view multiple time frames on charts within their apps. However, Trading 212 stands out in a few key areas. For instance, it syncs watchlist symbols between the mobile app and the client’s online account, allowing seamless transitions across platforms, a feature RoboForex lacks. Moreover, Trading 212 supplies an impressive 104 technical studies for charting, surpassing RoboForex’s offering of 30 studies. Both platforms excel in saving chart drawings automatically and allowing the creation of watchlists with real-time quotes.
When it comes to user ratings, both Trading 212 and RoboForex score well, each earning a four-star rating for mobile trading apps from users. However, Trading 212 has a slight edge as it holds the 17th rank out of 63 brokers in the Mobile Trading Apps category on ForexBrokers.com, while RoboForex ranks at 43. Overall, both apps offer comprehensive features tailored to traders' needs, but Trading 212 may appeal more to those who value technical analysis tools and cross-platform watchlist syncing.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
RoboForex
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Alerts - Basic Fields | Yes | Yes |
| Watchlist Syncing | Yes | No |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 104 | 30 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Multiple Time Frames | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Drawings Autosave | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlist | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
When comparing Trading 212 and RoboForex, both have their strengths and areas for improvement in market research offerings. RoboForex stands out by providing daily market commentary and access to Trading Central's tools, which can be highly beneficial for traders seeking in-depth analysis. However, Trading 212 compensates for its lack of daily commentary by offering forex news from top-tier sources like Bloomberg and provides traders with a useful sentiment-based trading tool. Additionally, both brokers offer economic calendars that help users stay informed about global economic events.
RoboForex's provision of Acuity Trading's Signal Centre further sets it apart in terms of available research tools, whereas Trading 212 does not utilize similar resources. Despite these differences, both brokers hold a 3.5-star rating for research, indicating comparable overall quality in their offerings. In rankings by ForexBrokers.com, RoboForex is positioned slightly higher at #37, compared to Trading 212's #44. Traders looking for specialized tools and daily insights may find RoboForex more suitable, while those valuing top-tier news and sentiment analysis might prefer Trading 212.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
RoboForex
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary | No | Yes |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes |
| Autochartist | No | No |
| Trading Central (Recognia) | No | Yes |
| Social Sentiment - Currency Pairs | Yes | No |
| TipRanks | No | No |
| Signal Centre (Acuity Trading) | No | Yes |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
When comparing the educational resources available to beginners, Trading 212 stands out over RoboForex. Trading 212 offers a wide range of educational materials, including over ten articles and videos focused on forex or CFDs, as well as numerous beginner and advanced trading videos. Additionally, Trading 212 provides a searchable archive of recorded webinars and a comprehensive investor dictionary featuring over 50 investing terms. These tools can be particularly beneficial for those new to trading, allowing users to build foundational knowledge and develop more advanced skills at their own pace.
In contrast, RoboForex falls short in providing rich educational content for beginners. It lacks an extensive library of educational pieces and videos tailored for both beginners and advanced traders. Moreover, RoboForex does not offer an archive of past webinars or a detailed investor dictionary. Even though both Trading 212 and RoboForex conduct online webinars occasionally, the overall accessibility and breadth of educational resources at Trading 212 make it a more appealing choice for newcomers to the trading world. Despite having equal star ratings, Trading 212 is ranked significantly higher in the education category, highlighting its superior resources compared to RoboForex.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
RoboForex
|
|---|---|---|
| Education (Forex or CFDs) | Yes | No |
| Client Webinars | No | No |
| Client Webinars (Archived) | Yes | No |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | No |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | No |
| Investor Dictionary (Glossary) | Yes | No |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that Trading 212 is better than RoboForex. Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #31, while RoboForex finished with an overall rank of #46.
Best known for its mobile trading app, Trading 212 offers an easy-to-use trading platform suite for CFD and share trading, as well as a large variety of forex pairs. However, despite its well-designed platform and wide range of symbols, its lack of advanced trading tools and flat research offerings hamper Trading 212’s bid to be considered a top broker.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
RoboForex
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 80 | 73 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Commissions & Fees |
|
|
| Platforms & Tools |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
Both Trading 212 and RoboForex do not offer the ability to buy actual delivered cryptocurrency, but they both provide the option to invest in cryptocurrency derivatives.
Trading 212 and RoboForex both support ACH and SEPA transfers, PayPal, Visa or Mastercard, and bank wires for depositing or withdrawing funds, but only RoboForex provides the additional option of Skrill.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | Trading 212 | RoboForex | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Commissions & Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Platforms & Tools |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 80 | 73 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Trading 212 Review | RoboForex Review |
| Broker Screenshots | Trading 212 | RoboForex | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trading Platforms Gallery (click to expand) |
| ||
| Mobile Trading Gallery (click to expand) |
| ||
| Research Gallery (click to expand) |
| ||
| Education Gallery (click to expand) |
|
| Regulation | Trading 212 | RoboForex | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 80 | 73 | |
| Year Founded | 2004 | 2009 | |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No | |
| Bank | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes | |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 1 | |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 2 |
| Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | Trading 212 | RoboForex | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (ASIC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Canada (CIRO Authorised) | No | No | |
| Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Japan (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Singapore (MAS Authorised) | No | No | |
| Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | No | |
| New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes |
| Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | Trading 212 | RoboForex | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya (CMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | No | |
| South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | No | No | |
| UAE (DFSA/Central Bank Authorised) | No | No | |
| India (SEBI Authorised) | No | No | |
| Jordan (JSC Authorised) | No | No |
| Investments | Trading 212 | RoboForex | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 7868 | 8400 | |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 146 | 28 | |
| U.S. Stock Trading (Non CFD) | Yes | No | |
| Int'l Stock Trading (Non CFD) | Yes | No | |
| Social Trading / Copy Trading | No | Yes | |
| Cryptocurrency (Physical) | No | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (Derivative) | Yes | Yes | |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
| Cost | Trading 212 | RoboForex | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Spread EUR/USD - Standard | 2.7 | 1.3 | |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 2.7 | N/A | |
| Active Trader or VIP Discounts | No | Yes | |
| Inactivity Fee | No | Yes | |
| Execution: Agency Broker | Yes | Yes | |
| Execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
| Funding | Trading 212 | RoboForex | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | €1 | $100 | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | Yes | |
| Visa/Mastercard (Credit/Debit) | Yes | Yes | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| ACH or SEPA Transfers | Yes | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | Trading 212 | RoboForex | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Platform | Yes | No | |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | No | Yes | |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Social Trading / Copy Trading | No | Yes | |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | No | Yes | |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | Yes | |
| cTrader | No | No | |
| DupliTrade | No | No | |
| ZuluTrade | No | No |
| Trading Tools | Trading 212 | RoboForex | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
| Alerts - Basic Fields | Yes | Yes | |
| Watchlists - Total Fields | 5 | 7 | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 54 | 30 | |
| Charting - Drawing Tools (Total) | 20 | 15 | |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
| Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Trading | Trading 212 | RoboForex | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Alerts - Basic Fields | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Watchlist | Yes | Yes | |
| Watchlist Syncing | Yes | No | |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 104 | 30 | |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Multiple Time Frames | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Drawings Autosave | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Research | Trading 212 | RoboForex | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary | No | Yes | |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes | |
| Autochartist | No | No | |
| Trading Central (Recognia) | No | Yes | |
| TipRanks | No | No | |
| Social Sentiment - Currency Pairs | Yes | No | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Education | Trading 212 | RoboForex | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Education (Forex or CFDs) | Yes | No | |
| Client Webinars | No | No | |
| Client Webinars (Archived) | Yes | No | |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | No | |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | No | |
| Investor Dictionary (Glossary) | Yes | No |
| Major Forex Pairs | Trading 212 | RoboForex | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GBP/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/JPY | Yes | Yes | |
| EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/CHF | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/CAD | Yes | Yes | |
| NZD/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| AUD/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| Review | Trading 212 Review | RoboForex Review |
| Overall | Trading 212 | RoboForex | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Commissions & Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Platforms & Tools |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 80 | 73 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Trading 212 Review | RoboForex Review |
IG
CMC Markets
FOREX.com
XTB
eToro
AvaTrade
Plus500
Pepperstone
FP Markets
Tickmill