Written by ForexBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of Trading 212 vs Exness, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Trading 212 and Exness are both well-established online brokers, with Trading 212 founded in 2004 and Exness in 2008. Neither company is publicly traded, nor do they operate as banks. When it comes to regulatory licenses, Trading 212 holds three Tier-1 licenses, considered highly trusted, while Exness holds two. On the other hand, Exness has three Tier-2 licenses, regarded as trusted, whereas Trading 212 holds none.
In terms of safety and reliability, Trading 212 has a Trust Score of 80 from ForexBrokers.com, placing it in the "trusted" category. Exness scores slightly higher with a Trust Score of 81, also falling under the "trusted" category. Both brokers offer solid trading options, but their regulatory standings and trust ratings provide potential investors with important factors to consider when choosing between them.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Exness
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2004 | 2008 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 2 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 0 | 3 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 3 |
Both Trading 212 and Exness earn 4 out of 5 stars for commissions and fees. In ForexBrokers.com’s 2025 rankings, Trading 212 places 27th of 63 brokers, while Exness ranks 31st of 63. That means they’re comparable on headline value, but their pricing structures differ in ways that may suit different trading styles.
Trading 212 offers two accounts: Invest (shares) and CFD (derivatives), with this comparison focused on the CFD account. The minimum deposit is 10 euros for CFDs (1 euro for Invest). Trading 212 advertises zero-commission trading, but you still pay the spread on CFDs and forex. It now publishes average spread data; in April 2025, the EUR/USD averaged 2.7 pips—higher than the industry norm—so frequent forex traders may find costs add up despite the no-commission pitch.
Exness provides five main account types, letting you trade commission-free or pay a commission for tighter spreads. Standard Cent and Standard are commission-free with wider spreads; the Pro account is also commission-free with better spreads and supports both instant and market execution. The Zero Spread account charges a $0.05 per-trade commission with market execution, while the Raw account charges up to $7 per round turn lot ($3.5 per side) with very low spreads. Most accounts use market execution; commission accounts have margin calls at 30% and no leverage or stop-out restrictions. If you prefer simpler pricing, Exness’s commission-free options are straightforward; if you want the tightest spreads, the Zero Spread or Raw accounts can be more cost-efficient than Trading 212’s higher average spreads.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Exness
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | €1 | $10 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 2.7 | N/A |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 2.7 | N/A |
| Non-wire bank transfer | Yes | No |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | Yes |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
Comparing Trading 212 vs Exness for range of investments, Trading 212 stands out for sheer market access. It lists 7,868 tradeable symbols and 146 forex pairs, compared with Exness’ 209 symbols and 96 forex pairs. Both let you trade forex as CFDs or spot, and both offer cryptocurrency CFDs (but neither supports buying actual crypto). If you want stocks, Trading 212 provides exchange-traded securities on both U.S. and international exchanges, while Exness does not offer exchange-traded stocks.
Feature-wise, Exness offers copy trading, whereas Trading 212 does not. For scope of markets, Trading 212 earns 5 stars and ranks #15 out of 63 brokers for Range of Investments on ForexBrokers.com, while Exness scores 3.5 stars and ranks #34. In short: choose Trading 212 for wider market access and stocks, or pick Exness if copy trading is a priority.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Exness
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 7868 | 209 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 146 | 96 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | Yes | No |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | No |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | No |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
Comparing Trading 212 vs Exness for trading platforms and tools: both brokers offer free demo (paper) accounts, in-house proprietary platforms, web-based trading, and the ability to place trades directly from charts. Key differences start with platform range. Exness provides a Windows desktop download and supports MetaTrader 4 (MT4) and MetaTrader 5 (MT5), plus copy trading. Trading 212 does not offer a Windows desktop app, does not support MT4 or MT5, and does not provide copy trading.
For ratings, both Trading 212 and Exness earn 4 stars for Trading Platforms and Tools at ForexBrokers.com, with Exness ranked #15 out of 63 brokers and Trading 212 at #19. If you want MT4/MT5, copy trading, or a Windows desktop platform, Exness fits better; if you prefer a simple proprietary and web-only setup with chart trading and a free demo, Trading 212 is a strong pick.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Exness
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | No | Yes |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | No | Yes |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | Yes |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 54 | 107 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
Trading 212 and Exness both offer mobile trading apps for iPhone and Android. Each app supports stock and forex price alerts and lets you draw trendlines on charts. Both are rated 4 out of 5 stars for Mobile Trading Apps, and ForexBrokers.com ranks them close together: Trading 212 at #17 and Exness at #18 out of 63 brokers.
The key differences show up in syncing and charting depth. Trading 212 syncs your watchlist between the mobile app and your online account, while Exness does not. For charting tools, Trading 212 includes 104 technical studies versus 35 with Exness, and it auto-saves your chart drawings; Exness does not. If you want deeper indicators and synced watchlists, Trading 212 has the edge. If you mainly need alerts and trendline drawing on iPhone or Android, Exness covers the basics.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Exness
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | No |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 104 | 35 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | No |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
Comparing market research at Trading 212 vs Exness, Exness has a slight edge for active traders. Exness provides daily market commentary and offers Trading Central tools, adding extra depth to technical and fundamental analysis. Both brokers deliver forex news from top-tier sources such as Bloomberg, Reuters, or Dow Jones, along with a sentiment tool that shows long/short positioning and an economic calendar to track key events. Neither broker includes Autochartist, TipRanks, or Acuity Trading tools.
When it comes to third-party reviews, both Trading 212 and Exness earn 3.5 out of 5 stars for Research at ForexBrokers.com. Exness ranks 31st out of 63 brokers, just ahead of Trading 212 at 32nd. If you want daily briefings and Trading Central, Exness is the better fit. If your needs center on quality news, market sentiment, and a handy calendar, both platforms deliver similar value.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Exness
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | No | Yes |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes |
| Autochartist | No | No |
| Trading Central | No | Yes |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes |
| TipRanks | No | No |
| Acuity Trading | No | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
Trading 212 vs Exness for beginner education: both brokers deliver a solid library of forex and CFD learning materials. Each offers at least 10 beginner-friendly videos plus 10 or more advanced videos, so you can start with the basics and grow into more complex topics at your own pace. This makes either platform a practical pick if you prefer structured, on-demand video lessons to learn trading step by step.
Where they differ is live learning. Trading 212 does not run monthly client webinars, while Exness does—useful if you like real-time Q&A and guided sessions. Both are rated 3.5 out of 5 stars for Education, with Trading 212 ranked #20 and Exness #21 out of 63 brokers by ForexBrokers.com. In short, choose Exness if webinars matter to you; otherwise, both are comparable for video-based beginner education, with Trading 212 holding a slight edge in the rankings.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Exness
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | Yes |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that Trading 212 is better than Exness. Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #25, while Exness finished with an overall rank of #31.
Best known for its mobile trading app, Trading 212 offers an easy-to-use trading platform suite for CFD and share trading, as well as a large variety of forex pairs. However, despite its well-designed platform and wide range of symbols, its lack of advanced trading tools and flat research offerings hamper Trading 212’s bid to be considered a top broker.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Exness
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 80 | 81 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Trading Fees |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
In the Trading 212 vs Exness comparison for cryptocurrency trading, neither broker supports buying actual (delivered) crypto, but both offer cryptocurrency CFDs for speculative trading.
Trading 212 vs Exness: For deposits and withdrawals, Trading 212 supports ACH/SEPA transfers, PayPal, and bank wires (but not Skrill), while Exness supports Skrill and bank wires but does not offer ACH/SEPA or PayPal.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | Trading 212 | Exness | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 80 | 81 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Trading 212 Review | Exness Review |
| Broker Screenshots | Trading 212 | Exness | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
|
|
| Regulation | Trading 212 | Exness | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 80 | 81 | |
| Year Founded | 2004 | 2008 | |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No | |
| Bank | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes | |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 2 | |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 0 | 3 | |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 3 |
| Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | Trading 212 | Exness | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (ASIC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Canada (CIRO Authorised) | No | No | |
| Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Japan (FSA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Singapore (MAS Authorised) | No | No | |
| Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | |||
| United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | Yes | Yes | |
| USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | No | |
| New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes |
| Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | Trading 212 | Exness | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya (CMA Authorised) | Yes | ||
| Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | No | |
| South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | No | Yes | |
| UAE (DFSA, FSRA, or SCA Authorised) | No | Yes | |
| India (SEBI Authorised) | No | No | |
| Jordan (JSC Authorised) | Yes |
| Investments | Trading 212 | Exness | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 7868 | 209 | |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 146 | 96 | |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | Yes | No | |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | No | |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes | |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
| Cost | Trading 212 | Exness | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 2.7 | N/A | |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 2.7 | N/A | |
| Inactivity Fee | No | No | |
| Order execution: Agency | Yes | Yes | |
| Order execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
| Funding | Trading 212 | Exness | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | €1 | $10 | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | Yes | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| Non-wire bank transfer | Yes | No |
| Trading Platforms | Trading 212 | Exness | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | No | Yes | |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes | |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | No | Yes | |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | Yes | |
| cTrader | No | No |
| Trading Tools | Trading 212 | Exness | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
| Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 54 | 107 | |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
| Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Trading | Trading 212 | Exness | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Watchlist [DELETED] | |||
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | No | |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 104 | 35 | |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | No | |
| Mobile Research - Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Research | Trading 212 | Exness | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | No | Yes | |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes | |
| Autochartist | No | No | |
| Trading Central | No | Yes | |
| TipRanks | No | No | |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Education | Trading 212 | Exness | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | Yes | |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Major Forex Pairs | Trading 212 | Exness | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GBP/USD [DELETED] | |||
| USD/JPY [DELETED] | |||
| EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/CHF [DELETED] | |||
| USD/CAD [DELETED] | |||
| NZD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| AUD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| Review | Trading 212 Review | Exness Review |
| Overall | Trading 212 | Exness | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 80 | 81 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Trading 212 Review | Exness Review |
IG
CMC Markets
FOREX.com
XTB
eToro
AvaTrade
Pepperstone
FP Markets
Tickmill