Written by ForexBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of Trading 212 vs IUX, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
When comparing online brokers Trading 212 and IUX, it’s essential to consider their regulatory standings and longevity. Established in 2004, Trading 212 has secured a solid foundation over the years. Although neither broker is publicly traded, nor operates as a bank, Trading 212 distinguishes itself by holding three Tier-1 licenses, which are highly trusted by ForexBrokers.com. Meanwhile, IUX, founded in 2016, has one Tier-1 license, enhancing its credibility to a degree.
Both brokers have varying trust ratings and licensing levels. Trading 212 boasts a Trust Score of 80 out of 99, grouping it as a trusted broker by ForexBrokers.com. In comparison, IUX, with a Trust Score of 78, is considered to have an average risk in the same scoring system. This assessment is further defined by IUX's inclusion of a Tier-2 license, which ForexBrokers.com also deems as trusted, albeit to a lesser degree than Tier-1. These differences reflect the distinct paths each broker has taken in establishing their trust and reliability in the online trading space.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
IUX
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2004 | 2016 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 1 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 0 | 1 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 1 |
Trading 212 vs IUX: commissions and fees come down mostly to spreads and account type. Trading 212’s CFD account (minimum deposit: €10) advertises zero commission, but you pay the spread. For April 2025, its published average spread on EUR/USD was 2.7 pips, which is higher than the industry average. Trading 212 earns 4 out of 5 stars for commissions and fees and ranks #27 out of 63 brokers.
IUX offers multiple choices: Standard and Standard+ (both $10 minimum) are spread‑only accounts, while Pro ($500 minimum) is spread‑only with tighter pricing, and Raw ($500 minimum) adds a $6 per standard lot commission in exchange for the lowest spreads. Listed average EUR/USD spreads are 0.9 pips on Standard, 0.7 pips on Pro, and about 0.6 pips all‑in on Raw once you factor in the commission. IUX also earns 4 out of 5 stars, but ranks higher at #19 out of 63.
Bottom line: if your top priority is lower EUR/USD trading costs, IUX’s Pro or Raw accounts look cheaper than Trading 212’s 2.7‑pip average, though IUX’s spread averages don’t include date ranges. Choose based on your deposit budget and preference for spread‑only vs commission pricing: casual traders may find Trading 212’s setup simple, while active traders may favor IUX’s tighter spreads.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
IUX
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | €1 | 10 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 2.7 | 0.86 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 2.7 | 0.6 |
| Non-wire bank transfer | Yes | No |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | Yes |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
Trading 212 offers a far wider range of investments than IUX. You can trade 7,868 instruments on Trading 212 versus 152 on IUX. Both brokers support forex trading via CFDs or spot contracts, but Trading 212 lists 146 currency pairs while IUX has 34. Each supports crypto trading through CFDs and does not allow buying actual coins. Neither platform offers copy trading.
For share dealing, Trading 212 provides exchange-traded securities on both U.S. markets (such as Apple) and international exchanges, while IUX offers international listings but not U.S. stocks. Reflecting this broader lineup, ForexBrokers.com rates Trading 212 at 5 stars and ranks it 15th out of 63 brokers for Range of Investments; IUX earns 3.5 stars and ranks 35th.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
IUX
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 7868 | 152 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 146 | 34 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | Yes | No |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | No |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | No |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
Comparing Trading 212 vs IUX on platforms and tools shows plenty of overlap with a few key differences. Both brokers provide free paper trading (demo accounts), in-house proprietary platforms, web-based platforms, and the ability to place trades directly from charts. Neither offers copy trading or MetaTrader 4 (MT4). Indicator counts and watch list column options weren’t specified.
The biggest split is platform choice: IUX offers a Windows desktop platform and supports MetaTrader 5 (MT5), while Trading 212 does not provide a Windows download and doesn’t support MT5. In independent ratings, Trading 212 scores 4 stars and ranks 19th out of 63 brokers for Trading Platforms and Tools, while IUX earns 3.5 stars and ranks 35th. For traders who want MT5 or a downloadable Windows app, IUX stands out; for a higher-rated, web-first experience, Trading 212 gets the edge.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
IUX
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | No | Yes |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | No |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | No | No |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | Yes |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 54 | 106 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
Both Trading 212 and IUX offer mobile trading apps for iPhone and Android. Trading 212 stands out for everyday usability with price alerts and watchlist syncing between the app and your online account—features IUX does not provide. For charting, IUX includes 106 technical studies versus 104 on Trading 212, but Trading 212 lets you draw trendlines while IUX does not. Both apps auto-save chart drawings.
Ratings reflect these trade-offs: ForexBrokers.com scores Trading 212 at 4 stars and ranks it 17th out of 63 brokers for Mobile Trading Apps, while IUX earns 3.5 stars and ranks 35th. If you value alerts, synced watchlists, and trendline tools, the Trading 212 app is likely the better fit; if you want a slightly larger library of technical studies, IUX has a minor edge.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
IUX
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | No |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | No |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 104 | 106 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | No |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
Comparing market research at Trading 212 vs IUX: both skip daily market commentary and both provide an economic calendar. Trading 212 stands out by offering forex news from major outlets like Bloomberg or Reuters and a sentiment tool that shows the ratio of long vs short positions. IUX lacks both the top-tier news feed and the sentiment tool. Neither broker integrates Autochartist, Trading Central, TipRanks, or Acuity Trading.
Bottom line: if you want built-in news and crowd sentiment, Trading 212 offers more; if you mainly need an economic calendar, both fit the bill. According to ForexBrokers.com, Trading 212 earns 3.5/5 for research and ranks 32nd out of 63 brokers, while IUX scores 3/5 and ranks 35th. For research features and convenience, Trading 212 has the edge, while IUX is more basic.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
IUX
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | No | No |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | No |
| Autochartist | No | No |
| Trading Central | No | No |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | No |
| TipRanks | No | No |
| Acuity Trading | No | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
Comparing Trading 212 and IUX for beginner education, both brokers deliver a solid starting point with at least 10 beginner-focused trading videos, making self-paced learning straightforward. Neither broker hosts monthly client webinars, so live, interactive sessions are not part of the experience.
As you progress, Trading 212 stands out by offering 10+ advanced videos, while IUX does not provide that level of depth for experienced traders. This difference is reflected in independent ratings: Trading 212 earns 3.5/5 stars for Education and ranks #20 out of 63 brokers at ForexBrokers.com, whereas IUX scores 3/5 stars and ranks #35. In short, both are beginner-friendly, but Trading 212 is the better choice if you want more advanced lessons as you grow.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
IUX
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | No |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | No |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that Trading 212 is better than IUX. Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #25, while IUX finished with an overall rank of #35.
Best known for its mobile trading app, Trading 212 offers an easy-to-use trading platform suite for CFD and share trading, as well as a large variety of forex pairs. However, despite its well-designed platform and wide range of symbols, its lack of advanced trading tools and flat research offerings hamper Trading 212’s bid to be considered a top broker.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
IUX
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 80 | 78 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Trading Fees |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
Trading 212 vs IUX: neither online broker lets you buy actual (delivered) cryptocurrency, but both offer trading in cryptocurrency CFDs.
In a Trading 212 vs IUX comparison of funding methods, Trading 212 offers ACH/SEPA and PayPal while IUX does not, IUX offers Skrill while Trading 212 does not, both support bank wires, and Visa/Mastercard availability is not specified for either.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 80 | 78 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Trading 212 Review | IUX Review |
| Broker Screenshots | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
|
| Regulation | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 80 | 78 | |
| Year Founded | 2004 | 2016 | |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No | |
| Bank | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | No | |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 1 | |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 0 | 1 | |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 1 |
| Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (ASIC Authorised) | No | Yes | |
| Canada (CIRO Authorised) | No | No | |
| Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Japan (FSA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Singapore (MAS Authorised) | No | No | |
| Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | No | ||
| United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | No | |
| New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | No |
| Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya (CMA Authorised) | No | ||
| Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | No | |
| South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | No | Yes | |
| UAE (DFSA, FSRA, or SCA Authorised) | No | No | |
| India (SEBI Authorised) | No | No | |
| Jordan (JSC Authorised) | No |
| Investments | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 7868 | 152 | |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 146 | 34 | |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | Yes | No | |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | No | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
| Cost | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 2.7 | 0.86 | |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 2.7 | 0.6 | |
| Inactivity Fee | No | Yes | |
| Order execution: Agency | Yes | No | |
| Order execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
| Funding | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | €1 | 10 | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | Yes | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| Non-wire bank transfer | Yes | No |
| Trading Platforms | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | No | Yes | |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | No | No | |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | No | No | |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | Yes | |
| cTrader | No | No |
| Trading Tools | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
| Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 54 | 106 | |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
| Charts can be saved | Yes | No |
| Mobile Trading | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | No | |
| Mobile Watchlist [DELETED] | |||
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | No | |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 104 | 106 | |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | No | |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Research - Economic Calendar | Yes | No |
| Research | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | No | No | |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | No | |
| Autochartist | No | No | |
| Trading Central | No | No | |
| TipRanks | No | No | |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | No | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Education | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | No | |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | No |
| Major Forex Pairs | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GBP/USD [DELETED] | |||
| USD/JPY [DELETED] | |||
| EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/CHF [DELETED] | |||
| USD/CAD [DELETED] | |||
| NZD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| AUD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| Review | Trading 212 Review | IUX Review |
| Overall | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 80 | 78 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Trading 212 Review | IUX Review |
IG
CMC Markets
FOREX.com
XTB
eToro
AvaTrade
Pepperstone
FP Markets
Tickmill