Written by ForexBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of Trading 212 vs IUX, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
When comparing online brokers Trading 212 and IUX, it’s essential to consider their regulatory standings and longevity. Established in 2004, Trading 212 has secured a solid foundation over the years. Although neither broker is publicly traded, nor operates as a bank, Trading 212 distinguishes itself by holding three Tier-1 licenses, which are highly trusted by ForexBrokers.com. Meanwhile, IUX, founded in 2016, has one Tier-1 license, enhancing its credibility to a degree.
Both brokers have varying trust ratings and licensing levels. Trading 212 boasts a Trust Score of 80 out of 99, grouping it as a trusted broker by ForexBrokers.com. In comparison, IUX, with a Trust Score of 78, is considered to have an average risk in the same scoring system. This assessment is further defined by IUX's inclusion of a Tier-2 license, which ForexBrokers.com also deems as trusted, albeit to a lesser degree than Tier-1. These differences reflect the distinct paths each broker has taken in establishing their trust and reliability in the online trading space.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
IUX
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2004 | 2016 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 1 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 0 | 1 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 1 |
Trading 212 and IUX each earn 4 out of 5 stars for commissions and fees. In ForexBrokers.com’s rankings, IUX is #49 of 63 brokers, edging out Trading 212 at #50. The key difference is pricing style: Trading 212 promotes zero-commission CFD and forex trades but relies on spreads, while IUX offers a choice of spread-only or commission-based accounts that can deliver lower effective costs if you select the right tier.
Trading 212 has two accounts: Invest (min deposit €1) and CFD (min deposit €10). This comparison looks at the CFD account. Even with zero-commission marketing, you still pay the spread; the broker’s published average EUR/USD spread for April 2025 was 2.7 pips—above the industry average—so frequent traders may find it pricier than many peers, despite the welcome move to publish average spread data.
IUX prices vary by account. Standard and Standard+ start at just $10; Standard+ supports deposit bonuses but typically has wider spreads, while Standard targets lower spreads without bonuses. For active traders with $500 minimums, Pro is spread-only with an average EUR/USD spread around 0.7 pips, and Raw pairs very low spreads with a $6 per-lot commission (about 0.6 pips all-in). The Standard account averages about 0.9 pips. Overall, IUX is competitive—especially on Pro and Raw—though not the absolute cheapest; the best choice depends on your deposit size, whether you prefer spread-only pricing, and how often you trade.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
IUX
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | €1 | 10 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 2.7 | 0.9 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 2.7 | 0.6 |
| Non-wire bank transfer | Yes | No |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | Yes |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
Trading 212 offers a far wider range of investments than IUX: 7,868 tradable symbols versus 152, including 146 forex pairs compared with IUX’s 34. Both brokers support forex trading as CFDs or spot contracts and offer cryptocurrency via CFDs (neither lets you buy actual coins). Copy trading isn’t available at either broker.
For stocks, Trading 212 lets you buy exchange-traded shares in the U.S. (for example, Apple on NASDAQ) and on international markets, while IUX offers exchange-traded shares on international markets only—not U.S. listings. Reflecting this broader selection, ForexBrokers.com rates Trading 212 at 5 stars and ranks it 16th out of 63 for Range of Investments, compared with IUX at 3.5 stars and 61st out of 63.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
IUX
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 7868 | 152 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 146 | 34 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | Yes | No |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | No |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | No |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
Trading 212 and IUX both provide free paper trading via demo accounts and run their own proprietary, web-based trading platforms. Trading 212 does not offer a Windows desktop download, while IUX does. Neither broker supports copy trading. For third-party software, Trading 212 skips MetaTrader entirely, whereas IUX supports MetaTrader 5 (MT5) but not MT4. Both brokers let you place trades directly from charts. Indicator totals and watchlist column counts are not specified.
In independent testing by ForexBrokers.com, Trading 212 earned 4 stars and ranked #20 out of 63 brokers for Trading Platforms and Tools. IUX scored 3.5 stars and ranked #60. If you want a simple web experience with built-in chart trading and a demo account, both will work; choose IUX if you need a Windows desktop platform or MT5 support, and Trading 212 if rankings and ratings matter more to you.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
IUX
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | No | Yes |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | No |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | No | No |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | Yes |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 54 | 106 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
Trading 212 and IUX both offer iPhone and Android apps for trading stocks and forex. For charting, IUX lists 106 technical indicators while Trading 212 has 104. However, Trading 212 includes trendline drawing on mobile charts and IUX does not. Both apps auto-save chart drawings. Key convenience features favor Trading 212: it offers price alerts and watchlist syncing with your web account, while IUX lacks both. If you rely on alerts to catch market moves or want your watchlists to stay consistent across devices, Trading 212 is the more seamless pick; if you mainly care about the sheer number of indicators, IUX has a slight edge.
Ratings and rankings reflect these trade-offs. Trading 212 earns 4 stars for Mobile Trading Apps and ranks #17 out of 63 brokers on ForexBrokers.com, while IUX scores 3.5 stars and ranks #61. In short: Trading 212 is better suited for everyday use with alerts, synced watchlists, and on-chart tools, whereas IUX appeals to indicator-focused traders who can live without those extras.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
IUX
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | No |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | No |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 104 | 106 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | No |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
Comparing Trading 212 vs IUX for market research: both skip daily market commentary and don’t include tools from Autochartist, Trading Central, TipRanks, or Acuity Trading. Trading 212 stands out by offering forex news from top-tier sources like Bloomberg, Reuters, or Dow Jones, and it adds a sentiment tool that shows long vs short positioning across instruments. IUX lacks these two features. Both brokers provide an economic calendar to track global events.
Overall, Trading 212 delivers more research value, reflected in its 3.5-star Research rating and #45 rank out of 63 brokers at ForexBrokers.com. IUX trails with a 3-star rating and a #60 rank. If live news and sentiment insights matter to you, Trading 212 is the better fit; if you only need a basic calendar, either platform will do.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
IUX
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | No | No |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | No |
| Autochartist | No | No |
| Trading Central | No | No |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | No |
| TipRanks | No | No |
| Acuity Trading | No | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
Beginners will find video lessons at both Trading 212 and IUX, with each broker offering at least 10 beginner-focused videos covering trading basics. Neither broker currently runs monthly live educational webinars. The available details don’t confirm whether either platform provides a full set of 10 or more forex- or CFD-specific articles, videos, or archived webinars.
Trading 212 goes further for growing traders by also offering at least 10 advanced videos, while IUX does not. Reflecting this, Trading 212 earns 3.5 out of 5 stars for Education and ranks #21 out of 63 brokers on ForexBrokers.com, compared with IUX at 3 stars and a #60 ranking. For beginners who want room to advance, Trading 212 is the stronger pick; if you only need basic video lessons, either broker can cover the essentials.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
IUX
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | No |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | No |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that Trading 212 is better than IUX. Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #31, while IUX finished with an overall rank of #55.
Best known for its mobile trading app, Trading 212 offers an easy-to-use trading platform suite for CFD and share trading, as well as a large variety of forex pairs. However, despite its well-designed platform and wide range of symbols, its lack of advanced trading tools and flat research offerings hamper Trading 212’s bid to be considered a top broker.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
IUX
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 80 | 78 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Commissions & Fees |
|
|
| Platforms & Tools |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
Trading 212 vs IUX: neither online broker lets you buy actual (delivered) cryptocurrency, but both offer trading in cryptocurrency CFDs.
In a Trading 212 vs IUX comparison of funding methods, Trading 212 offers ACH/SEPA and PayPal while IUX does not, IUX offers Skrill while Trading 212 does not, both support bank wires, and Visa/Mastercard availability is not specified for either.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Commissions & Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Platforms & Tools |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 80 | 78 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Trading 212 Review | IUX Review |
| Broker Screenshots | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
|
| Regulation | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 80 | 78 | |
| Year Founded | 2004 | 2016 | |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No | |
| Bank | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | No | |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 1 | |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 0 | 1 | |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 1 |
| Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (ASIC Authorised) | No | Yes | |
| Canada (CIRO Authorised) | No | No | |
| Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Japan (FSA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Singapore (MAS Authorised) | No | No | |
| Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | No | ||
| United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | No | |
| New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | No |
| Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya (CMA Authorised) | No | ||
| Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | No | |
| South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | No | Yes | |
| UAE (DFSA, FSRA, or SCA Authorised) | No | No | |
| India (SEBI Authorised) | No | No | |
| Jordan (JSC Authorised) | No |
| Investments | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 7868 | 152 | |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 146 | 34 | |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | Yes | No | |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | No | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
| Cost | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 2.7 | 0.9 | |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 2.7 | 0.6 | |
| Inactivity Fee | No | Yes | |
| Order execution: Agency | Yes | No | |
| Order execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
| Funding | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | €1 | 10 | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | Yes | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| Non-wire bank transfer | Yes | No |
| Trading Platforms | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | No | Yes | |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | No | No | |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | No | No | |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | Yes | |
| cTrader | No | No |
| Trading Tools | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
| Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 54 | 106 | |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
| Charts can be saved | Yes | No |
| Mobile Trading | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | No | |
| Mobile Watchlist [DELETED] | |||
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | No | |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 104 | 106 | |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | No | |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Research - Economic Calendar | Yes | No |
| Research | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | No | No | |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | No | |
| Autochartist | No | No | |
| Trading Central | No | No | |
| TipRanks | No | No | |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | No | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Education | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | No | |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | No |
| Major Forex Pairs | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GBP/USD [DELETED] | |||
| USD/JPY [DELETED] | |||
| EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/CHF [DELETED] | |||
| USD/CAD [DELETED] | |||
| NZD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| AUD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| Review | Trading 212 Review | IUX Review |
| Overall | Trading 212 | IUX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Commissions & Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Platforms & Tools |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 80 | 78 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Trading 212 Review | IUX Review |
IG
CMC Markets
FOREX.com
XTB
eToro
AvaTrade
Pepperstone
FP Markets
Tickmill