Written by ForexBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of StoneX Trading vs Trading 212, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
StoneX Trading and Trading 212 are both non-bank online brokers, but their background and regulation differ in important ways. StoneX Trading was founded in 1983, is publicly traded, and holds 7 Tier-1 licenses plus 1 Tier-2 license, giving it a ForexBrokers.com Trust Score of 99 out of 99, which falls in the highly trusted range. Trading 212 was founded in 2004, is not publicly traded, and holds 3 Tier-1 licenses and no Tier-2 licenses.
Based on ForexBrokers.com’s trust scale, Trading 212’s 82 out of 99 places it in the trusted range, while StoneX Trading’s 99 score signals a higher level of trust overall. For traders comparing regulation and company transparency, StoneX Trading stands out for its longer history, public listing, and stronger license count, while Trading 212 still offers a solid but lower-rated regulatory profile.
| Feature |
StoneX Trading
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 1983 | 2004 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | Yes | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 7 | 3 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 1 | 0 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 1 | 0 |
When it comes to commissions and fees, StoneX Trading comes out ahead of Trading 212 for cost-conscious CFD and forex traders. StoneX Trading is rated 4.5 out of 5 stars and ranks #16 out of 36 brokers for commissions and fees. Its pricing is generally in line with the industry average, and using its own platform or MetaTrader can help you get the best rates. For example, its average EUR/USD spread was 0.74 pips as of July 2023, which is competitive, though still not as low as the very best brokers in this category.
Trading 212 is rated 4 out of 5 stars and ranks #28 out of 36 for commissions and fees. It advertises zero-commission trading, but traders still pay spreads on CFDs and forex. That matters because Trading 212’s average EUR/USD spread was 2.7 pips in April 2025, which is well above the industry average and makes it more expensive for active traders compared with StoneX Trading.
Both brokers offer ways to trade without direct commission charges on some products, but the spread can make a big difference to your total cost. StoneX Trading also offers active trader rebates for higher monthly volumes, which can help lower costs further for frequent traders. Overall, StoneX Trading is the better pick on commissions and fees if lower trading costs are a priority.
| Feature |
StoneX Trading
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | £100.00 | €1 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Spread-only account | 1.4 | 2.7 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Raw spread account | 0.9 | 2.7 |
| Non-wire bank transfer (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | No |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
StoneX Trading and Trading 212 both give traders access to forex as CFDs or spot contracts, but their product lists differ in a few key ways. StoneX Trading offers 13,500 tradeable symbols, slightly more than Trading 212’s 13,000, while Trading 212 has the wider forex lineup with 180 pairs compared with StoneX Trading’s 66. Both brokers also let clients trade cryptocurrency CFDs, but only Trading 212 lets users buy actual cryptocurrency, while StoneX Trading does not.
When it comes to shares, Trading 212 offers exchange traded securities on both U.S. and international exchanges, such as Apple and Vodafone, while StoneX Trading does not offer these direct stock purchases. StoneX Trading does, however, offer copy trading, which Trading 212 does not. Despite these differences, both brokers are rated 5 out of 5 stars for range of investments, with StoneX Trading ranked #8 and Trading 212 ranked #14 out of 36 brokers by ForexBrokers.com in this category.
| Feature |
StoneX Trading
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 13500 | 13000 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 66 | 180 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | Yes |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | No | Yes |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | Yes |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
StoneX Trading and Trading 212 both give traders useful platform choices, including web-based access, free demo accounts for paper trading, and the ability to trade directly from a stock chart. Both are also easy to use for people who want to test ideas before risking real money. In ForexBrokers.com’s Trading Platforms and Tools review, StoneX Trading is rated 4.5 out of 5 stars and ranks #11 out of 36 brokers, while Trading 212 scores 4 out of 5 stars and ranks #19.
Where StoneX Trading stands out is in its extra platform options and tools. It offers its own in-house platform, a Windows desktop download, copy trading, and MetaTrader 4, while Trading 212 relies on its web platform and does not offer a desktop app, copy trading, or MT4. For traders who want more ways to access the market and more built-in features, StoneX Trading has the edge over Trading 212 in trading platforms and tools.
| Feature |
StoneX Trading
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | No |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | No |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 88 | 102 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
StoneX Trading and Trading 212 both cover the basics well for mobile trading, with iPhone and Android apps, price alerts, watchlist symbol syncing, trendline drawing, and auto-saving chart drawings. If you want a mobile app that lets you keep tabs on markets and manage watchlists across devices, both brokers deliver a similar experience. StoneX Trading’s app is rated 4.5 out of 5 stars for mobile trading, while Trading 212 is rated 4 out of 5 stars.
Where they differ most is in charting and overall mobile app ranking. Trading 212 offers 104 technical studies in its app, compared with 88 at StoneX Trading, which may appeal to traders who rely more on chart tools. Even so, StoneX Trading ranks higher for mobile trading apps overall, placing 9th out of 36 brokers on ForexBrokers.com, while Trading 212 sits at 17th. In short, Trading 212 has the edge in chart indicators, but StoneX Trading comes out ahead in overall mobile app standing.
| Feature |
StoneX Trading
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 88 | 104 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
When it comes to market research, StoneX Trading has the edge over Trading 212. StoneX offers daily market commentary, forex news from major sources like Bloomberg and Reuters, Trading Central research tools, a sentiment tool showing long and short positions, and an economic calendar. Trading 212 also provides forex news, a sentiment tool, and an economic calendar, but it does not include daily market commentary or Trading Central.
This difference shows up in expert ratings and rankings too. StoneX Trading scores 4.5 out of 5 for Research and ranks #10 out of 36 brokers on ForexBrokers.com, while Trading 212 scores 3.5 out of 5 and ranks #31. For traders who want more built-in research support, StoneX Trading is the stronger choice overall.
| Feature |
StoneX Trading
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes |
| Autochartist | No | No |
| Trading Central | Yes | No |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes |
| TipRanks | No | No |
| Acuity Trading | No | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
For beginners looking for trading education, StoneX Trading has the stronger overall offering compared with Trading 212. StoneX Trading provides forex and CFD education with at least 10 learning pieces focused on those markets, plus monthly educational webinars, which can be especially helpful for new traders who want live guidance. It also offers at least 10 beginner videos and at least 10 advanced videos, making it useful for both first-time learners and more experienced users. This is reflected in its Education rating of 4.5 out of 5 stars and a #9 ranking out of 36 brokers by ForexBrokers.com.
Trading 212 also gives beginners a solid video library, with at least 10 beginner educational videos and at least 10 advanced videos, but it does not offer monthly educational client webinars. It also falls behind StoneX Trading in forex and CFD-focused education, according to the information provided. As a result, Trading 212 earns a 3.5 out of 5 stars for Education and ranks #23 out of 36 brokers, making it a more limited choice if your main goal is structured learning support.
| Feature |
StoneX Trading
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | Yes | No |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that StoneX Trading is better than Trading 212. StoneX Trading finished with an overall rank of #8, while Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #25.
Backed by StoneX Group and formerly named City Index, StoneX Trading is a trusted brand known for its versatile trading platforms, excellent mobile app, diverse market research, and extensive range of tradeable markets.
| Feature |
StoneX Trading
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 99 | 82 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Trading Fees |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
When comparing StoneX Trading and Trading 212, both brokers offer cryptocurrency CFDs, but only Trading 212 allows you to buy actual, delivered cryptocurrency rather than just trading derivative products.
StoneX Trading supports ACH or SEPA transfers, PayPal, and bank wire funding, while Trading 212 offers bank wires only among these options, with neither broker supporting Skrill or clearly listing Visa or Mastercard deposits or withdrawals.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | StoneX Trading | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 99 | 82 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | StoneX Trading Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Broker Screenshots | StoneX Trading | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
|
|
| Regulation | StoneX Trading | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 99 | 82 | |
| Year Founded | 1983 | 2004 | |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | Yes | No | |
| Bank | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes | |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 7 | 3 | |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 1 | 0 | |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 1 | 0 |
| Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | StoneX Trading | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (ASIC Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| Canada (CIRO Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Japan (FSA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Singapore (MAS Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | |||
| United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | Yes | Yes | |
| USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | No | |
| New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes |
| Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | StoneX Trading | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya (CMA Authorised) | |||
| Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | No | |
| South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | No | No | |
| UAE (DFSA, FSRA, or CMA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| India (SEBI Authorised) | No | No | |
| Jordan (JSC Authorised) |
| Investments | StoneX Trading | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 13500 | 13000 | |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 66 | 180 | |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | Yes | |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | No | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | Yes | |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
| Cost | StoneX Trading | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Spread-only account | 1.4 | 2.7 | |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Raw spread account | 0.9 | 2.7 | |
| Inactivity Fee | Yes | No | |
| Order execution: Agency | No | Yes | |
| Order execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
| Funding | StoneX Trading | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | £100.00 | €1 | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | No | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| Non-wire bank transfer (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | StoneX Trading | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | No | |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No | |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No | |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No | |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | No | |
| cTrader | No | No |
| Trading Tools | StoneX Trading | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
| Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 88 | 102 | |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
| Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Trading | StoneX Trading | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Watchlist [DELETED] | |||
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 88 | 104 | |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Research - Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Research | StoneX Trading | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No | |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes | |
| Autochartist | No | No | |
| Trading Central | Yes | No | |
| TipRanks | No | No | |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Education | StoneX Trading | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | Yes | No | |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Major Forex Pairs | StoneX Trading | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GBP/USD [DELETED] | |||
| USD/JPY [DELETED] | |||
| EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/CHF [DELETED] | |||
| USD/CAD [DELETED] | |||
| NZD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| AUD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| Review | StoneX Trading Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Overall | StoneX Trading | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 99 | 82 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | StoneX Trading Review | Trading 212 Review |
IG
FOREX.com
CMC Markets
XTB
eToro
Capital.com
AvaTrade
XM
Pepperstone
FP Markets
Tickmill
HFM Markets