Written by ForexBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of Saxo vs Trading 212, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Saxo vs Trading 212: Saxo was founded in 1992 and Trading 212 in 2004. Neither company is publicly traded. Saxo is a bank, while Trading 212 is not. According to ForexBrokers.com, Saxo holds a Trust Score of 99 (highly trusted, 90–99), whereas Trading 212 scores 82 (trusted, 80–89).
On regulation, Saxo carries 7 Tier-1 licenses and 1 Tier-2 license, signaling wider oversight from top-tier regulators. Trading 212 holds 3 Tier-1 licenses and no Tier-2 licenses. If regulatory strength and trust ratings matter most to you, Saxo edges ahead; if you’re comfortable with a solid trusted rating and fewer licenses, Trading 212 may still fit your needs.
| Feature |
Saxo
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 1992 | 2004 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | Yes | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 7 | 3 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 1 | 0 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
Saxo comes out ahead of Trading 212 on commissions and fees, especially for active and high-volume traders. Saxo earns 5 stars and ranks #8 out of 36 brokers for commissions and fees, while Trading 212 earns 4 stars and ranks #28 out of 36. Saxo’s pricing is strongest on its Platinum and VIP accounts, where trading costs are closer to the industry average or better, and it also offers commission-free forex trading in most cases, with a $3 per-side ticket fee only for traders who trade less than 50,000 units per month.
In Saxo’s November 2023 pricing data, average EUR/USD spreads were 1.1 pips on Classic, 1.0 pips on Platinum, and 0.9 pips on VIP. The Classic account has become easier to access too, with a $0 minimum deposit for new customers, while Platinum requires $200,000 and VIP starts at $1,000,000 unless you qualify through Saxo’s loyalty program. Saxo also waives custody fees for share trading if you opt into securities lending.
Trading 212 advertises zero-commission trading, but costs still come through the spread on CFD and forex trades. Its April 2025 average EUR/USD spread was 2.7 pips, which is higher than the industry average and less competitive than Saxo’s pricing. For traders focused on lower everyday trading costs, Saxo is the better pick overall, while Trading 212 may appeal more to beginners who want a simple low-deposit setup.
| Feature |
Saxo
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $0 | €1 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Spread-only account | 1.0 | 2.7 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Raw spread account | 0.8 | 2.7 |
| Non-wire bank transfer (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | No |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | No |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
Saxo and Trading 212 both give traders access to forex as either CFDs or spot contracts, plus exchange-traded shares on U.S. and international markets. Neither platform offers copy trading. Where they differ is in overall choice: Saxo lists around 71,000 tradeable symbols and 192 forex pairs, while Trading 212 offers about 13,000 symbols and 180 forex pairs. Saxo also lets clients trade cryptocurrency CFDs, while Trading 212 adds the option to buy actual cryptocurrency as well as crypto CFDs.
For range of investments, both brokers are rated 5 out of 5 stars, but Saxo is ranked higher by ForexBrokers.com at #3 out of 36 brokers, compared with Trading 212 at #15. In simple terms, Saxo is the stronger pick for investors who want a wider market selection, while Trading 212 still covers the main bases and may appeal to those who want direct crypto ownership alongside stocks, forex, and crypto CFDs.
| Feature |
Saxo
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 71000 | 13000 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 192 | 180 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | Yes | Yes |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | No |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | Yes |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
Saxo and Trading 212 both give traders a free demo account, a web-based platform, and the ability to trade directly from a stock chart. Neither broker supports copy trading, MetaTrader 4, or MetaTrader 5. For everyday use, this means both platforms cover the basics well, especially if you want to test strategies first or manage trades in your browser.
The main difference is that Saxo offers more platform choice, including its own in-house software and a Windows desktop download, while Trading 212 does not offer a desktop app or proprietary platform. That extra flexibility helps explain why Saxo scores higher overall for trading platforms and tools, with a 5-star rating and a #3 ranking out of 36 brokers from ForexBrokers.com, compared with Trading 212’s 4 stars and #19 ranking.
| Feature |
Saxo
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | No |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | No |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | No | No |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | No |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 64 | 102 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
Saxo and Trading 212 both offer mobile trading apps for iPhone and Android, along with stock and forex price alerts, watchlist syncing between the app and online account, trendline drawing tools, and automatic saving of chart drawings. In day-to-day use, this means both apps give traders the basic tools they need to track markets, manage lists, and work on charts from a phone or tablet.
The main difference comes down to charting depth and overall app quality. Trading 212 offers more technical studies in its mobile app, with 104 compared with Saxo’s 64, but Saxo scores higher overall for mobile trading apps, earning 5 stars versus Trading 212’s 4 stars. Saxo is also ranked #3 out of 36 brokers for mobile trading apps by ForexBrokers.com, while Trading 212 sits at #17, which may make Saxo the stronger choice for traders who want a higher-rated app experience.
| Feature |
Saxo
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 64 | 104 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
Saxo comes out ahead of Trading 212 for market research. It offers daily market commentary, forex news from top sources like Bloomberg and Reuters, Autochartist tools, and a helpful economic calendar for tracking global events. Saxo is also rated 5 stars for Research and ranked #1 out of 36 brokers by ForexBrokers.com, which points to a much stronger set of research features for traders who want more in-depth market insight.
Trading 212 also gives users forex news from major providers and includes an economic calendar, but it does not offer daily market commentary or Autochartist tools. Its standout research feature is a sentiment tool that shows long and short positioning across markets. Even so, Trading 212 is rated 3.5 stars for Research and ranked #33 out of 36, so it is better suited to traders who want basic market updates rather than a wider research offering.
| Feature |
Saxo
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes |
| Autochartist | Yes | No |
| Trading Central | No | No |
| Client sentiment data | No | Yes |
| TipRanks | No | No |
| Acuity Trading | No | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
For beginners looking to learn the basics, Saxo has a clear edge over Trading 212 in education. Saxo offers forex and CFD learning content, runs online educational client webinars at least once a month, and provides at least 10 beginner videos as well as 10 advanced videos for more experienced traders. That wider mix of learning tools helps new traders build knowledge step by step, while also giving them room to keep learning as their skills improve.
Trading 212 also gives beginners useful learning material, including at least 10 beginner videos and at least 10 advanced videos, but it falls behind Saxo in key areas such as forex and CFD education and regular webinars. This shows up in its lower Education score of 3.5 out of 5 stars and its #20 ranking out of 36 brokers, compared with Saxo’s 5-star Education rating and #12 ranking. Overall, Saxo is the stronger choice for beginner-friendly education.
| Feature |
Saxo
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | Yes | No |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that Saxo is better than Trading 212. Saxo finished with an overall rank of #3, while Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #25.
Saxo is a multi-asset broker with brilliant research and a superb trading platform experience – as well as a stunning selection of over 40,000 securities.
| Feature |
Saxo
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 99 | 82 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Trading Fees |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
In the Saxo vs Trading 212 comparison, Trading 212 allows you to buy actual (delivered) cryptocurrency and cryptocurrency CFDs, while Saxo supports cryptocurrency CFDs but does not offer the purchase of actual crypto.
When comparing Saxo vs Trading 212, both brokers support bank wire transfers for depositing and withdrawing funds, while neither offers PayPal or Skrill, and Saxo does not support ACH or SEPA transfers as a funding option.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | Saxo | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 99 | 82 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Saxo Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Broker Screenshots | Saxo | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
|
|
| Regulation | Saxo | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 99 | 82 | |
| Year Founded | 1992 | 2004 | |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No | |
| Bank | Yes | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes | |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 7 | 3 | |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 1 | 0 | |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | Saxo | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (ASIC Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| Canada (CIRO Authorised) | No | No | |
| Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Japan (FSA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| Singapore (MAS Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | Yes | ||
| United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | Yes | Yes | |
| USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | No | |
| New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes |
| Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | Saxo | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya (CMA Authorised) | |||
| Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | No | |
| South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | No | No | |
| UAE (DFSA, FSRA, or CMA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| India (SEBI Authorised) | No | No | |
| Jordan (JSC Authorised) |
| Investments | Saxo | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 71000 | 13000 | |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 192 | 180 | |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | Yes | Yes | |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | No | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | Yes | |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
| Cost | Saxo | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Spread-only account | 1.0 | 2.7 | |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Raw spread account | 0.8 | 2.7 | |
| Inactivity Fee | No | No | |
| Order execution: Agency | Yes | Yes | |
| Order execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
| Funding | Saxo | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $0 | €1 | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | No | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | No | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| Non-wire bank transfer (Deposit/Withdraw) | No |
| Trading Platforms | Saxo | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | No | |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No | |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | No | No | |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | No | No | |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | No | |
| cTrader | No | No |
| Trading Tools | Saxo | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
| Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 64 | 102 | |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
| Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Trading | Saxo | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Watchlist [DELETED] | |||
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 64 | 104 | |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Research - Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Research | Saxo | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No | |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes | |
| Autochartist | Yes | No | |
| Trading Central | No | No | |
| TipRanks | No | No | |
| Client sentiment data | No | Yes | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Education | Saxo | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | Yes | No | |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Major Forex Pairs | Saxo | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GBP/USD [DELETED] | |||
| USD/JPY [DELETED] | |||
| EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/CHF [DELETED] | |||
| USD/CAD [DELETED] | |||
| NZD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| AUD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| Review | Saxo Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Overall | Saxo | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 99 | 82 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Saxo Review | Trading 212 Review |
IG
FOREX.com
CMC Markets
XTB
eToro
Capital.com
AvaTrade
Pepperstone
FP Markets
Tickmill