Written by ForexBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of FxPro vs Trading 212, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
In this FxPro vs Trading 212 comparison, FxPro (founded 2006) and Trading 212 (founded 2004) are online brokers. Neither is publicly traded; FxPro is a bank, while Trading 212 is not.
On regulation and safety, FxPro holds 2 Tier-1 licenses and 1 Tier-2 license; Trading 212 holds 3 Tier-1 licenses and no Tier-2 licenses. ForexBrokers.com rates brokers on a 99-point Trust Score where 90–99 is highly trusted, 80–89 trusted, 70–79 average risk, 60–69 high risk, and under 59 should not be trusted; FxPro scores 93 (highly trusted) and Trading 212 scores 82 (trusted).
| Feature |
FxPro
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2006 | 2004 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | Yes | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 2 | 3 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 1 | 0 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 2 | 0 |
When it comes to commissions and fees, both FxPro and Trading 212 earn 4 out of 5 stars, but they are priced differently. FxPro is ranked #30 out of 36 brokers, while Trading 212 sits slightly higher at #28 out of 36. FxPro’s pricing is above the industry average, and its costs can vary by platform and order type. On cTrader, FxPro’s most competitive setup uses commission-based pricing, with an effective EUR/USD cost of about 1.27 pips. On MT4 and MT5, variable spreads are higher, with EUR/USD spreads around 1.58 pips on market execution and 1.71 pips on instant execution, based on FxPro’s August 2020 data.
Trading 212’s CFD account advertises zero commission, but traders still pay the spread, which is the built-in cost on forex and CFD trades. In April 2025, Trading 212 reported an average EUR/USD spread of 2.7 pips, which is higher than the industry average and makes it less competitive on pricing than top brokers in this area. The CFD account also has a low minimum deposit of 10 euros, but for active traders, the spread matters more than the lack of commission.
Overall, FxPro tends to offer better pricing than Trading 212 for forex and CFD traders, especially on cTrader, even though both brokers score the same for commissions and fees. FxPro gives traders more pricing choices, including fixed and variable spreads on some platforms, while Trading 212 keeps things simple with zero-commission pricing but wider spreads. If you want lower trading costs, FxPro has the edge here.
| Feature |
FxPro
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $100 | €1 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 1.6 | 2.7 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 1.3 | 2.7 |
| Non-wire bank transfer | Yes | Yes |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
FxPro and Trading 212 both let clients trade forex as CFDs, and both also offer international exchange-traded shares. Where they differ most is in the size of their investment menus. FxPro lists 2,249 tradeable symbols and 70 forex pairs, while Trading 212 gives access to a much larger set with 13,000 tradeable symbols and 180 forex pairs. Trading 212 also stands out for offering U.S.-listed shares such as Apple as actual investments, which FxPro does not.
For extra features, FxPro supports copy trading, while Trading 212 does not. On crypto, both brokers offer cryptocurrency CFDs, but only Trading 212 lets clients buy actual cryptocurrency. These differences help explain why Trading 212 earns a 5-star rating for Range of Investments and ranks #15 out of 36 brokers, compared with FxPro’s 4-star rating and #24 ranking.
| Feature |
FxPro
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 2249 | 13000 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 70 | 180 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | Yes |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | Yes |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
FxPro and Trading 212 both give traders a free demo account and a web-based platform, so either option works well if you want to practice first or trade from a browser. Both also let you place trades straight from a chart. That said, FxPro has more platform choices overall: it offers its own in-house platform, a Windows desktop download, copy trading, and support for both MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5. Trading 212 does not offer a desktop download, copy trading, or MT4/MT5, and it does not have a proprietary platform of its own.
For trading platforms and tools, both brokers are rated 4 out of 5 stars, but FxPro is ranked slightly higher by ForexBrokers.com at #18 out of 36 brokers, compared with Trading 212 at #19. In simple terms, Trading 212 covers the basics well, while FxPro gives more options for traders who want extra platform features and more advanced tools.
| Feature |
FxPro
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | No |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 53 | 102 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
FxPro and Trading 212 both offer mobile trading apps for iPhone and Android, so traders can manage their accounts on the go with either broker. Each app also includes stock or forex price alerts, watchlist symbol syncing, trendline drawing on charts, and auto-saving for chart drawings. In other words, both platforms give mobile users the core tools most traders look for in a trading app.
The main difference is in charting depth and ratings. Trading 212 offers 104 technical studies in its mobile app, while FxPro provides 65, which may matter more for traders who rely heavily on chart analysis. Even so, FxPro has the edge in overall mobile app ratings, earning 4.5 out of 5 stars and ranking #15 out of 36 brokers in ForexBrokers.com’s Mobile Trading Apps category, compared with Trading 212’s 4 stars and #17 ranking.
| Feature |
FxPro
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 65 | 104 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
When comparing FxPro vs Trading 212 for market research, FxPro has the edge overall. FxPro offers daily market commentary, Trading Central tools, a sentiment indicator, top-tier forex news from sources like Bloomberg and Reuters, and an economic calendar, giving traders several ways to track market moves and spot trading ideas. Trading 212 also provides top-tier forex news, a sentiment tool, and an economic calendar, but it does not include daily market commentary or Trading Central research tools.
Neither broker offers Autochartist, TipRanks, or Acuity Trading research. Still, FxPro is rated 4 out of 5 stars for Research and ranks #23 out of 36 brokers on ForexBrokers.com, while Trading 212 is rated 3.5 out of 5 stars and ranks #33. For traders who want more built-in market analysis, FxPro is the stronger choice, while Trading 212 covers the basics well.
| Feature |
FxPro
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes |
| Autochartist | No | No |
| Trading Central | Yes | No |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes |
| TipRanks | No | No |
| Acuity Trading | No | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
FxPro and Trading 212 both give beginners a solid starting point, with each broker offering at least 10 beginner-focused trading videos and enough forex or CFD learning material to meet the basic education benchmark. Neither broker currently offers monthly educational webinars, so traders looking for live, ongoing classes will not find that with either platform. For newer traders, both brokers provide useful first steps into trading, but their learning libraries are aimed more at getting started than at offering a full classroom-style experience.
When comparing the two for more advanced learning, Trading 212 has the edge because it offers at least 10 advanced educational videos, while FxPro does not meet that mark. Even so, FxPro is rated higher overall for education, with 4 out of 5 stars and a ForexBrokers.com ranking of #17 out of 36 brokers, compared with Trading 212’s 3.5-star rating and #20 ranking. In simple terms, FxPro looks slightly better for overall education quality, while Trading 212 may suit traders who want more advanced video content.
| Feature |
FxPro
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | No |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | No | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that FxPro is better than Trading 212. FxPro finished with an overall rank of #20, while Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #25.
FxPro competes among the top MetaTrader brokers, featuring multiple account options and various execution methods. It provides its own proprietary FxPro Edge app alongside access to the BnkPro app (which isn’t yet available in all regions).
| Feature |
FxPro
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 93 | 82 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Trading Fees |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
In a FxPro vs Trading 212 comparison for cryptocurrency investing, Trading 212 supports buying actual (delivered) crypto while FxPro does not, and both online brokers offer cryptocurrency CFDs.
FxPro vs Trading 212: Both online brokers support ACH/SEPA and bank wire deposits and withdrawals, but only FxPro additionally offers PayPal and Skrill, providing broader, more flexible funding options than Trading 212.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 93 | 82 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | FxPro Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Broker Screenshots | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
|
|
| Regulation | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 93 | 82 | |
| Year Founded | 2006 | 2004 | |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No | |
| Bank | Yes | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes | |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 2 | 3 | |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 1 | 0 | |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 2 | 0 |
| Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (ASIC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Canada (CIRO Authorised) | No | No | |
| Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Japan (FSA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Singapore (MAS Authorised) | No | No | |
| Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | |||
| United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | Yes | Yes | |
| USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | No | |
| New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes |
| Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya (CMA Authorised) | No | ||
| Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | No | |
| South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| UAE (DFSA, FSRA, or CMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| India (SEBI Authorised) | No | No | |
| Jordan (JSC Authorised) |
| Investments | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 2249 | 13000 | |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 70 | 180 | |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | Yes | |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | Yes | |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
| Cost | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 1.6 | 2.7 | |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 1.3 | 2.7 | |
| Inactivity Fee | Yes | No | |
| Order execution: Agency | Yes | Yes | |
| Order execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
| Funding | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $100 | €1 | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| Non-wire bank transfer | Yes | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | No | |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No | |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No | |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No | |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No | |
| cTrader | Yes | No |
| Trading Tools | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
| Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 53 | 102 | |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
| Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Trading | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Watchlist [DELETED] | |||
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 65 | 104 | |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Research - Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Research | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No | |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes | |
| Autochartist | No | No | |
| Trading Central | Yes | No | |
| TipRanks | No | No | |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Education | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | No | |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | No | Yes |
| Major Forex Pairs | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GBP/USD [DELETED] | |||
| USD/JPY [DELETED] | |||
| EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/CHF [DELETED] | |||
| USD/CAD [DELETED] | |||
| NZD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| AUD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| Review | FxPro Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Overall | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 93 | 82 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | FxPro Review | Trading 212 Review |
IG
FOREX.com
CMC Markets
XTB
eToro
AvaTrade
Pepperstone
FP Markets
Tickmill