Written by ForexBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of FxPro vs Trading 212, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
In this FxPro vs Trading 212 comparison, FxPro (founded 2006) and Trading 212 (founded 2004) are online brokers. Neither is publicly traded; FxPro is a bank, while Trading 212 is not.
On regulation and safety, FxPro holds 2 Tier-1 licenses and 1 Tier-2 license; Trading 212 holds 3 Tier-1 licenses and no Tier-2 licenses. ForexBrokers.com rates brokers on a 99-point Trust Score where 90–99 is highly trusted, 80–89 trusted, 70–79 average risk, 60–69 high risk, and under 59 should not be trusted; FxPro scores 93 (highly trusted) and Trading 212 scores 82 (trusted).
| Feature |
FxPro
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2006 | 2004 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | Yes | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 2 | 3 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 1 | 0 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 2 | 0 |
FxPro and Trading 212 both receive 4 out of 5 stars for commissions and fees, but their pricing works in different ways. FxPro is ranked #31 out of 36 brokers in this category, while Trading 212 is ranked slightly higher at #29 out of 36. In simple terms, neither broker is a clear leader on cost, and both sit behind the cheapest choices in the market.
FxPro’s fees are generally above the industry average, especially on its MetaTrader accounts, where EUR/USD spreads can be wider depending on the execution type. Its best pricing is on cTrader, where commission-based trading gives an effective EUR/USD spread of about 1.27 pips. FxPro also offers variable and fixed spread options on some platforms, plus an Active Trader program with discounts of up to 30%, but even with those savings, its overall pricing still trails top low-cost rivals.
Trading 212 advertises zero-commission trading, but that mainly applies to its structure rather than the full trading cost. For CFDs and forex, traders still pay the spread, and Trading 212’s average EUR/USD spread was 2.7 pips in April 2025, which is high compared with the industry average. So, while Trading 212 can look simple on the surface, FxPro is usually the better pick if you want more platform-based pricing options, but Trading 212 is slightly ahead in the ranking for commissions and fees.
| Feature |
FxPro
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $100 | €1 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Spread-only account | 1.44 | 2.7 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Raw spread account | 0.92 | 2.7 |
| Non-wire bank transfer (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
When it comes to range of investments, Trading 212 offers a wider choice than FxPro. FxPro provides 2,278 tradeable symbols and 75 forex pairs, while Trading 212 lists 13,000 tradeable symbols and 180 forex pairs. Both brokers support forex trading, international exchange-traded shares, and cryptocurrency CFDs, but Trading 212 also lets clients buy actual cryptocurrency and U.S.-listed shares such as Apple, which FxPro does not.
FxPro does have some extras that Trading 212 does not, including copy trading. Still, Trading 212 comes out ahead overall for investment variety, earning 5 out of 5 stars for Range of Investments and ranking #14 out of 36 brokers at ForexBrokers.com, compared with FxPro’s 4 stars and #24 ranking. If your main goal is access to a larger selection of markets and assets, Trading 212 has the broader offering.
| Feature |
FxPro
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 2278 | 13000 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 75 | 180 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | Yes |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | Yes |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
FxPro and Trading 212 both give traders a free demo account for paper trading, plus web-based platforms and the option to trade straight from a chart. Each broker is also rated 4 out of 5 stars for trading platforms and tools, so both offer a solid setup for everyday trading. In ForexBrokers.com’s rankings, FxPro sits slightly ahead at #18 out of 36 brokers, while Trading 212 is #19.
The main difference is that FxPro offers more platform choice and more advanced trading tools. It supports Windows desktop trading, MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, and copy trading, while Trading 212 does not offer these options. Neither broker has its own in-house platform, but for traders who want desktop access, MetaTrader support, or copy trading, FxPro has the edge. Trading 212 is better suited to those who want a simpler web-based experience.
| Feature |
FxPro
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | No | No |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 53 | 102 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
FxPro and Trading 212 both offer mobile trading apps for iPhone and Android, so traders can manage their accounts on the go with either broker. Each app also includes stock or forex price alerts, watchlist symbol syncing, trendline drawing on charts, and auto-saving for chart drawings. In other words, both platforms give mobile users the core tools most traders look for in a trading app.
The main difference is in charting depth and ratings. Trading 212 offers 104 technical studies in its mobile app, while FxPro provides 65, which may matter more for traders who rely heavily on chart analysis. Even so, FxPro has the edge in overall mobile app ratings, earning 4.5 out of 5 stars and ranking #15 out of 36 brokers in ForexBrokers.com’s Mobile Trading Apps category, compared with Trading 212’s 4 stars and #17 ranking.
| Feature |
FxPro
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 65 | 104 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
When comparing FxPro vs Trading 212 for market research, FxPro has the edge in research tools and overall ratings, while Trading 212 stands out for its live news coverage. FxPro offers daily market commentary, Autochartist tools, and Trading Central research, plus an economic calendar to track major global events. It does not provide top-tier forex news feeds or sentiment tools, but it still earns a stronger Research score of 4 out of 5 and ranks #23 out of 36 brokers for this category.
Trading 212 takes a different approach to market research. It does not offer daily market commentary, Autochartist, or Trading Central, but it does provide forex news from major sources like Bloomberg, Reuters, and Dow Jones, along with a sentiment tool that shows long and short position ratios. Trading 212 also includes an economic calendar, but its Research rating is 3.5 out of 5 and it ranks #31 out of 36, putting it behind FxPro overall for research depth.
| Feature |
FxPro
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | No | Yes |
| Autochartist | Yes | No |
| Trading Central | Yes | No |
| Client sentiment data | No | Yes |
| TipRanks | No | No |
| Acuity Trading | No | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
FxPro and Trading 212 both give beginners a decent starting point with more than 10 beginner-focused educational videos, so new traders can learn the basics without feeling overwhelmed. Neither broker offers monthly live educational webinars, and neither one appears to provide 10 or more forex or CFD education pieces based on the criteria given. For Education, FxPro has the edge overall, with a 4-star rating and a #17 ranking out of 36 brokers, compared with Trading 212’s 3.5-star rating and #23 ranking.
Where Trading 212 stands out is in its content for more experienced traders: it offers at least 10 advanced educational videos, while FxPro does not meet that mark. For beginners, though, both brokers are fairly close, and the choice may come down to whether you want a slightly stronger all-around education section, where FxPro leads, or a wider mix that also includes more advanced video material, where Trading 212 has the advantage.
| Feature |
FxPro
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | No |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | No | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that FxPro is better than Trading 212. FxPro finished with an overall rank of #20, while Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #25.
FxPro competes among the top MetaTrader brokers, featuring multiple account options and various execution methods. It provides its own proprietary FxPro Edge app alongside access to the BnkPro app (which isn’t yet available in all regions).
| Feature |
FxPro
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 93 | 82 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Trading Fees |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
In a FxPro vs Trading 212 comparison for cryptocurrency investing, Trading 212 supports buying actual (delivered) crypto while FxPro does not, and both online brokers offer cryptocurrency CFDs.
When comparing FxPro vs Trading 212, FxPro stands out for funding flexibility with ACH/SEPA transfers, PayPal, Skrill, and bank wires, while Trading 212 supports bank wires only and does not offer PayPal or Skrill.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 93 | 82 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | FxPro Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Broker Screenshots | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
|
|
| Regulation | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 93 | 82 | |
| Year Founded | 2006 | 2004 | |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No | |
| Bank | Yes | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes | |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 2 | 3 | |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 1 | 0 | |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 2 | 0 |
| Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (ASIC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Canada (CIRO Authorised) | No | No | |
| Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Japan (FSA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Singapore (MAS Authorised) | No | No | |
| Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | |||
| United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | Yes | Yes | |
| USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | No | |
| New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes |
| Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya (CMA Authorised) | No | ||
| Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | No | |
| South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| UAE (DFSA, FSRA, or CMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| India (SEBI Authorised) | No | No | |
| Jordan (JSC Authorised) |
| Investments | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 2278 | 13000 | |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 75 | 180 | |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | Yes | |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | Yes | |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
| Cost | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Spread-only account | 1.44 | 2.7 | |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Raw spread account | 0.92 | 2.7 | |
| Inactivity Fee | Yes | No | |
| Order execution: Agency | Yes | Yes | |
| Order execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
| Funding | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $100 | €1 | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| Non-wire bank transfer (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | No | No | |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No | |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No | |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No | |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No | |
| cTrader | Yes | No |
| Trading Tools | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
| Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 53 | 102 | |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
| Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Trading | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 65 | 104 | |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Research - Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Research | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No | |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | No | Yes | |
| Autochartist | Yes | No | |
| Trading Central | Yes | No | |
| TipRanks | No | No | |
| Client sentiment data | No | Yes | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Education | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | No | |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | No | Yes |
| Major Forex Pairs | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| Review | FxPro Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Overall | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 93 | 82 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | FxPro Review | Trading 212 Review |
IG
FOREX.com
CMC Markets
XTB
eToro
Capital.com
AvaTrade
XM
Pepperstone
FP Markets
Tickmill
HFM Markets