Written by ForexBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of FxPro vs Trading 212, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
FxPro and Trading 212 are prominent online brokers with distinct features and regulatory standings. Founded in 2006, FxPro is both a broker and a bank, offering financial services with the added assurance of holding two Tier-1 licenses and a Tier-2 license, which speaks to its reliability in regulatory compliance. As per ForexBrokers.com, FxPro boasts a Trust Score of 93, reflecting its position as a highly trusted broker. Although not publicly traded, FxPro's comprehensive licenses and banking status contribute to its credibility among traders.
Trading 212, on the other hand, has been operating since 2004 and holds the distinction of possessing three Tier-1 licenses, though it does not hold any Tier-2 licenses. The broker has a Trust Score of 80, indicating it is a trusted entity according to ForexBrokers.com. While it’s not a bank or publicly traded, Trading 212 stands out with its regulatory backing, ensuring that clients can confidently engage with their platform. The differences in their regulatory structures make both companies appealing to different types of traders seeking security and trust in their online trading activities.
| Feature |
FxPro
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2006 | 2004 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | Yes | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 2 | 3 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 1 | 0 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 2 | 0 |
FxPro and Trading 212 both earn 4 out of 5 stars for commissions and fees, yet their pricing structures differ in important ways. According to ForexBrokers.com, Trading 212 ranks #27 of 63 in this category, edging out FxPro at #29. In practice, both brokers price above the industry average on key forex pairs, but FxPro can be cheaper on its cTrader account than Trading 212’s CFD spreads for EUR/USD.
FxPro’s pricing is generally higher than peers like Pepperstone and IC Markets, though its cTrader account is the most cost‑effective option. On cTrader, the effective EUR/USD cost is about 1.27 pips (0.37‑pip average spread plus 0.9‑pip commission equivalent). On MT4/MT5, variable EUR/USD spreads are typically around 1.58 pips on market execution (about 1.51 on MT5) and 1.71 pips with instant execution. Instant execution can trigger requotes but avoids slippage; market execution removes requotes but can slip. Note: cTrader has no minimum stop/limit distance, while MetaTrader requires at least 1 pip, and MT5 doesn’t offer fixed spreads. FxPro’s Elite/Active Trader program offers up to 30% discounts, though overall costs still trail top low‑cost competitors. FxPro commissions and fees rating: 4/5 stars; category ranking: #29/63.
Trading 212 markets zero‑commission CFD and forex trading, but you pay the spread. The broker now publishes average spreads; for EUR/USD, the average was 2.7 pips in April 2025—well above the industry average and higher than FxPro’s cTrader effective cost on that pair. Account minimums are low (Invest: €1; CFD: €10), and pricing transparency has improved, but the wider spreads put Trading 212 at a disadvantage for cost‑focused traders. Trading 212 commissions and fees rating: 4/5 stars; category ranking: #27/63.
| Feature |
FxPro
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $100 | €1 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 1.6 | 2.7 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 1.3 | 2.7 |
| Non-wire bank transfer | Yes | Yes |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
If your priority is the range of investments, Trading 212 offers a much larger menu with 7,868 tradeable symbols versus FxPro’s 2,249. Trading 212 also lists 146 forex pairs compared with 70 at FxPro. Both brokers support forex trading (CFD or spot), and both let you trade cryptocurrency via CFDs; neither provides direct, delivered crypto.
For stocks, Trading 212 lets you buy real, exchange-traded U.S. shares as well as international shares, while FxPro supports international exchange-traded shares but not U.S.-listed stocks. FxPro does offer copy trading; Trading 212 does not. Reflecting this breadth, ForexBrokers.com rates Trading 212 at 5/5 stars and ranks it 15th out of 63 for Range of Investments, while FxPro earns 4/5 stars and ranks 24th.
| Feature |
FxPro
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 2249 | 7868 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 70 | 146 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | Yes |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | No |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
FxPro vs Trading 212: Both brokers offer free demo (paper) accounts and their own proprietary trading platforms. Each provides a web-based platform and the ability to place trades directly from charts. Key differences appear on desktop and third-party tools: FxPro offers a Windows desktop platform plus access to MetaTrader 4 (MT4) and MetaTrader 5 (MT5), along with copy trading. Trading 212 does not provide a Windows desktop download, MT4, MT5, or copy trading, focusing instead on its in-house web and mobile experience.
For trading platforms and tools, both brokers earn 4 out of 5 stars. In ForexBrokers.com’s rankings, FxPro sits at #18 of 63, with Trading 212 close behind at #19. If you want MT4/MT5, copy trading, or a Windows desktop platform, FxPro is the better fit. If you prefer a simple, browser-based platform built by the broker, Trading 212 is a strong alternative.
| Feature |
FxPro
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 53 | 54 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
FxPro and Trading 212 both deliver full-featured mobile trading apps for iPhone and Android. Each app supports price alerts, synced watchlists across devices, trendline drawing, and auto-saving of chart annotations. Where they differ is charting depth: Trading 212 offers 104 technical studies, while FxPro provides 65. If you rely heavily on built-in indicators, Trading 212 gives you more options, but both cover the essentials for day-to-day charting and trade management.
According to ForexBrokers.com, FxPro’s mobile app earns 4.5 stars and ranks #15 out of 63 brokers, while Trading 212 scores 4 stars and ranks #17. In short, choose Trading 212 for a larger indicator library, or pick FxPro for a higher-rated overall mobile experience—with both delivering iPhone and Android access, timely alerts, and convenient watchlist syncing.
| Feature |
FxPro
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 65 | 104 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
Comparing market research at FxPro and Trading 212, both brokers cover the essentials with forex news from top-tier sources like Bloomberg and Reuters, an economic calendar, and sentiment tools that show the share of long vs. short positions. FxPro pulls ahead by adding daily market commentary and integrated Trading Central analysis, two features that Trading 212 does not provide. Neither broker includes Autochartist, TipRanks, or Acuity Trading tools.
These differences are reflected in independent ratings: ForexBrokers.com gives FxPro 4 stars for Research and ranks it 23rd out of 63 brokers, while Trading 212 earns 3.5 stars and ranks 32nd. If you want daily insights and Trading Central’s technical and fundamental views, FxPro is the stronger pick. If you mainly need quality news, a clear calendar, and sentiment data, Trading 212 covers the basics.
| Feature |
FxPro
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes |
| Autochartist | No | No |
| Trading Central | Yes | No |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes |
| TipRanks | No | No |
| Acuity Trading | No | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
FxPro vs Trading 212 for beginner education: both brokers make it easy to start learning with at least 10 beginner-friendly trading videos that explain the basics in plain terms. Neither broker holds monthly live educational webinars. Trading 212 goes further with at least 10 advanced videos for when you’re ready to level up, while FxPro doesn’t match that depth on advanced topics.
Even so, ForexBrokers.com rates FxPro higher for education overall (4.0/5) than Trading 212 (3.5/5), with FxPro ranked #17 of 63 brokers versus Trading 212 at #20. If you want straightforward starter lessons and a higher-rated education experience, FxPro has the edge. If you expect to move quickly into more advanced video content, Trading 212 could be the better fit.
| Feature |
FxPro
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | No |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | No | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that FxPro is better than Trading 212. FxPro finished with an overall rank of #20, while Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #25.
FxPro competes among the top MetaTrader brokers, featuring multiple account options and various execution methods. It provides its own proprietary FxPro Edge app – though it isn’t yet available for mobile – alongside access to the BnkPro app (which isn’t yet available in all regions).
| Feature |
FxPro
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 93 | 80 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Trading Fees |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
In a head-to-head comparison, online brokers FxPro and Trading 212 both do not allow buying actual (delivered) cryptocurrencies, but each provides access to cryptocurrency CFD trading.
FxPro vs Trading 212: both online brokers support ACH/SEPA, PayPal, and bank wire deposits/withdrawals, only FxPro offers Skrill, and Visa/Mastercard availability is not specified for either.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 93 | 80 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | FxPro Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Broker Screenshots | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
|
|
| Regulation | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 93 | 80 | |
| Year Founded | 2006 | 2004 | |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No | |
| Bank | Yes | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes | |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 2 | 3 | |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 1 | 0 | |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 2 | 0 |
| Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (ASIC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Canada (CIRO Authorised) | No | No | |
| Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Japan (FSA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Singapore (MAS Authorised) | No | No | |
| Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | |||
| United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | Yes | Yes | |
| USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | No | |
| New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes |
| Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya (CMA Authorised) | No | ||
| Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | No | |
| South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| UAE (DFSA, FSRA, or SCA Authorised) | No | No | |
| India (SEBI Authorised) | No | No | |
| Jordan (JSC Authorised) |
| Investments | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 2249 | 7868 | |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 70 | 146 | |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | Yes | |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
| Cost | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 1.6 | 2.7 | |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 1.3 | 2.7 | |
| Inactivity Fee | Yes | No | |
| Order execution: Agency | Yes | Yes | |
| Order execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
| Funding | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $100 | €1 | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| Non-wire bank transfer | Yes | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No | |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No | |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No | |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No | |
| cTrader | Yes | No |
| Trading Tools | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
| Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 53 | 54 | |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
| Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Trading | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Watchlist [DELETED] | |||
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 65 | 104 | |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Research - Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Research | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No | |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes | |
| Autochartist | No | No | |
| Trading Central | Yes | No | |
| TipRanks | No | No | |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Education | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | No | |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | No | Yes |
| Major Forex Pairs | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GBP/USD [DELETED] | |||
| USD/JPY [DELETED] | |||
| EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/CHF [DELETED] | |||
| USD/CAD [DELETED] | |||
| NZD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| AUD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| Review | FxPro Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Overall | FxPro | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 93 | 80 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | FxPro Review | Trading 212 Review |
IG
CMC Markets
FOREX.com
XTB
eToro
AvaTrade
Pepperstone
FP Markets
Tickmill