Written by ForexBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of Tickmill vs Trading 212, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Tickmill vs Trading 212: Tickmill was founded in 2014, while Trading 212 dates back to 2004. Neither broker is publicly traded or a bank. Based on ForexBrokers.com’s Trust Score scale (where 80–89 is “trusted”), Tickmill scores 85 and Trading 212 scores 82—meaning both are considered trusted.
Looking at regulatory information, Tickmill holds 2 Tier-1 licenses (highly trusted) and 2 Tier-2 licenses (trusted). Trading 212 holds 3 Tier-1 licenses and 0 Tier-2 licenses. In short, Trading 212 has more top-tier authorizations, while Tickmill combines top- and mid-tier licensing; both meet trusted standards for safety and oversight.
| Feature |
Tickmill
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2014 | 2004 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 2 | 3 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 2 | 0 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 1 | 0 |
Comparing commissions and fees, Tickmill and Trading 212 take different routes to pricing. Tickmill’s Raw account uses tight spreads plus a small per-trade commission, while Trading 212 advertises zero-commission CFD trading but builds costs into wider spreads. For Commissions and Fees, Tickmill is rated 4.5/5 stars and ranked #10 of 63 by ForexBrokers.com; Trading 212 is rated 4/5 stars and ranked #27 of 63.
Tickmill has two accounts. Classic is commission-free but carries higher average spreads (about 1.76 pips on EUR/USD as of August 2023). The Raw account replaced the Pro account and charges $3 per side per 100,000 units ($6 per standard lot), with a $100 minimum deposit. Tickmill lists a typical EUR/USD spread of 0.11 pips (October 2023) on Raw; after the commission increase, the estimated all-in cost is about 0.71 pips under normal market conditions. This model tends to favor active traders who value lower total costs per trade.
Trading 212 offers Invest (stocks/ETFs) and CFD accounts, with minimum deposits of 1 euro and 10 euros, respectively. While it promotes zero-commission trading, you still pay the spread on CFDs and forex. Trading 212 now publishes average spreads; for April 2025, EUR/USD averaged 2.7 pips—meaning the effective cost per trade is typically higher than with leading low-spread, commission-based brokers like Tickmill’s Raw account.
| Feature |
Tickmill
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | 100 | €1 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 1.70 | 2.7 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.70 | 2.7 |
| Non-wire bank transfer | No | Yes |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
When it comes to range of investments, Trading 212 offers a much wider choice than Tickmill. Both brokers support forex trading as CFDs, but Tickmill lists 637 tradeable symbols and 62 forex pairs, while Trading 212 provides 13,000 tradeable symbols and 180 forex pairs. Trading 212 also lets clients buy exchange-traded shares on U.S. and international exchanges, such as Apple and Vodafone, while Tickmill does not offer access to these direct stock investments.
There are also key differences in extras and crypto access. Tickmill offers copy trading, which Trading 212 does not, but Trading 212 allows buying actual cryptocurrency, not just crypto CFDs, while Tickmill only offers crypto CFDs. Overall, Trading 212 is rated 5 stars for Range of Investments and ranks #15 out of 63 brokers, compared with Tickmill’s 3.5 stars and #30 ranking, making Trading 212 the stronger choice for investors who want more variety.
| Feature |
Tickmill
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 637 | 13000 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 62 | 180 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | Yes |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | No | Yes |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | Yes |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
Tickmill vs Trading 212: platform and tools comparison made simple. Both brokers offer free paper trading (demo accounts), web-based platforms, and the ability to place trades directly from charts. Neither provides a proprietary platform. A key difference is desktop access: Tickmill offers a Windows download platform, while Trading 212 does not.
For platform choice, Tickmill supports MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 and also offers copy trading—features Trading 212 doesn’t provide. Both earn 4 out of 5 stars for Trading Platforms and Tools, while ForexBrokers.com ranks Trading 212 at #19 of 63 and Tickmill at #24 of 63. If you want MT4/MT5 and copy trading, Tickmill fits the bill; if you’re fine with a browser-based setup and don’t need those extras, Trading 212 is a solid alternative.
| Feature |
Tickmill
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | No | No |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 97 | 102 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
Tickmill and Trading 212 both offer mobile trading apps for iPhone and Android, so either broker gives you a way to trade on the go. Both apps also let you sync watchlists between the mobile app and your online account, and both support trendline drawing on charts. In terms of charting, Tickmill offers 97 technical studies, while Trading 212 provides 104, giving Trading 212 a slight edge for traders who want more built-in analysis tools.
Where Trading 212 stands out more clearly is in alerts and chart saving. Trading 212 offers stock and forex price alerts, while Tickmill does not, and Trading 212 also auto-saves chart drawings, which can be helpful if you often mark up charts. Both brokers are rated 4 out of 5 stars for mobile trading apps, but Trading 212 is ranked higher overall by ForexBrokers.com at #17 out of 63 brokers, compared with Tickmill at #25.
| Feature |
Tickmill
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | No | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 97 | 104 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | No | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
When comparing Tickmill and Trading 212 for market research, Tickmill has the edge overall. It offers daily market commentary, research tools from Acuity Trading, and an economic calendar, which can help traders keep track of key events and possible market moves. Tickmill is rated 4 out of 5 stars for Research and ranks #19 out of 63 brokers in the ForexBrokers.com Research category.
Trading 212 also provides an economic calendar and stands out for its access to forex news from major sources such as Bloomberg, Reuters, and Dow Jones, plus a sentiment tool that shows long and short positioning across markets. However, it does not offer daily market commentary or Acuity Trading tools, and it is rated 3.5 out of 5 stars for Research, ranking #32 out of 63 brokers. Neither broker offers Autochartist, Trading Central, or TipRanks research tools.
| Feature |
Tickmill
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | No | Yes |
| Autochartist | No | No |
| Trading Central | No | No |
| Client sentiment data | No | Yes |
| TipRanks | No | No |
| Acuity Trading | Yes | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
Tickmill and Trading 212 both cater to beginners with at least 10 video lessons that cover the basics of trading, and each also includes advanced videos for when you’re ready to go deeper. A key difference is live education: Tickmill hosts client webinars at least once a month, while Trading 212 does not offer ongoing educational webinars. If you like learning in real time and asking questions, that live format can be a major plus.
On overall education quality, Tickmill holds a 4 out of 5 star rating and ranks #14 out of 63 brokers for Education at ForexBrokers.com. Trading 212 earns 3.5 out of 5 stars and ranks #20. For beginners, that means both brokers provide meaningful learning paths, but Tickmill’s regular webinars and higher ranking may give it the edge if you want more guided support.
| Feature |
Tickmill
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | Yes | No |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that Tickmill is better than Trading 212. Tickmill finished with an overall rank of #23, while Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #25.
Tickmill is a run-of-the-mill MetaTrader broker that offers a limited selection of tradeable securities. The broker does offer very competitive commission-based pricing for professionals through its VIP and Pro accounts.
| Feature |
Tickmill
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 85 | 82 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Trading Fees |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
Tickmill vs Trading 212: Tickmill offers cryptocurrency trading only via CFDs (no ability to buy actual delivered coins), while Trading 212 supports both buying real cryptocurrencies and trading crypto CFDs.
Comparing online brokers Tickmill vs Trading 212: Tickmill offers deposits and withdrawals via PayPal, Skrill, and bank wire but not ACH/SEPA (Visa/Mastercard not specified), while Trading 212 supports ACH/SEPA and bank wire but not PayPal or Skrill (Visa/Mastercard not specified).
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 85 | 82 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Tickmill Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Broker Screenshots | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
|
|
| Regulation | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 85 | 82 | |
| Year Founded | 2014 | 2004 | |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No | |
| Bank | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes | |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 2 | 3 | |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 2 | 0 | |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 1 | 0 |
| Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (ASIC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Canada (CIRO Authorised) | No | No | |
| Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Japan (FSA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Singapore (MAS Authorised) | No | No | |
| Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | |||
| United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | Yes | Yes | |
| USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | No | |
| New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes |
| Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya (CMA Authorised) | |||
| Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | No | |
| South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| UAE (DFSA, FSRA, or CMA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| India (SEBI Authorised) | No | No | |
| Jordan (JSC Authorised) |
| Investments | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 637 | 13000 | |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 62 | 180 | |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | Yes | |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | No | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | Yes | |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
| Cost | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 1.70 | 2.7 | |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.70 | 2.7 | |
| Inactivity Fee | No | No | |
| Order execution: Agency | Yes | Yes | |
| Order execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
| Funding | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | 100 | €1 | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| Non-wire bank transfer | No | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | No | No | |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No | |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No | |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No | |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No | |
| cTrader | No | No |
| Trading Tools | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
| Price Alerts | No | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 97 | 102 | |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
| Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Trading | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Price Alerts | No | Yes | |
| Mobile Watchlist [DELETED] | |||
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 97 | 104 | |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | No | Yes | |
| Mobile Research - Economic Calendar | No | Yes |
| Research | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No | |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | No | Yes | |
| Autochartist | No | No | |
| Trading Central | No | No | |
| TipRanks | No | No | |
| Client sentiment data | No | Yes | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Education | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | Yes | No | |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Major Forex Pairs | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GBP/USD [DELETED] | |||
| USD/JPY [DELETED] | |||
| EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/CHF [DELETED] | |||
| USD/CAD [DELETED] | |||
| NZD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| AUD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| Review | Tickmill Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Overall | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 85 | 82 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Tickmill Review | Trading 212 Review |
IG
FOREX.com
CMC Markets
XTB
eToro
AvaTrade
Pepperstone
FP Markets
Tickmill