Written by ForexBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of Tickmill vs Trading 212, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Tickmill, founded in 2014, stands out as a trusted online broker with a Trust Score of 86, indicating a high level of reliability. Although not publicly traded or a bank, Tickmill holds two Tier-1 licenses, which reflects its strong standing in the industry for trustworthiness. In addition, it holds two Tier-2 licenses, further reinforcing its reputation as a secure platform for trading.
Founded in 2004, Trading 212 is also a non-publicly traded online broker which is not classified as a bank. It holds a Trust Score of 80, placing it in the trusted category. Notably, Trading 212 has secured three Tier-1 licenses, demonstrating a commendable level of trust. However, it does not possess any Tier-2 licenses. Both brokers offer a secure trading experience, but a close look at their regulatory licenses and trust scores can help traders make a more informed choice.
| Feature |
Tickmill
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2014 | 2004 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 2 | 3 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 2 | 0 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 1 | 0 |
Comparing commissions and fees, Tickmill and Trading 212 take different paths. Tickmill offers two forex/CFD account types: Classic (no commission, you pay the spread) and Raw (low spreads plus a commission). The Raw account charges $3 per side per standard lot ($6 round turn), replacing the old Pro pricing, and has a $100 minimum deposit. Trading 212 splits pricing between its Invest account (for shares) and its CFD account; while it advertises zero-commission trading, you still pay the spread. Minimum deposits are low: €1 for Invest and €10 for CFDs.
On pricing for popular pairs like EUR/USD, the differences are clear. Tickmill’s Raw account lists a typical spread of 0.11 pips; after adding the new commission (about 0.6 pips round turn), the all-in trading cost is roughly 0.71 pips under normal market conditions. Tickmill’s Classic account is commission-free but much wider at 1.76 pips (Aug 2023). By contrast, Trading 212’s published average spread for EUR/USD was 2.7 pips in April 2025 on its CFD account—meaning higher costs than many leading forex and CFD brokers, including Tickmill’s Raw account.
Bottom line: for active forex and CFD traders focused on low all-in costs, Tickmill’s Raw account is hard to beat. Tickmill earns 5 out of 5 stars for commissions and fees and ranks #10 out of 63 brokers. Trading 212 earns 4 out of 5 stars and ranks #27 out of 63; it’s easy to start with very small deposits, but its wider average spreads can make frequent trading more expensive.
| Feature |
Tickmill
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $100 | €1 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 1.70 | 2.7 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.70 | 2.7 |
| Non-wire bank transfer | No | Yes |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
Trading 212 wins on sheer variety: it lists 7,868 tradeable symbols and 146 forex pairs, while Tickmill has 637 symbols and 63 forex pairs. Both let you trade forex as CFDs or spot. Trading 212 also lets you buy real exchange-traded shares in the U.S. and internationally, which Tickmill doesn’t support. For crypto, neither broker offers real coins, but both provide cryptocurrency CFDs. One notable difference: Tickmill includes copy trading; Trading 212 does not.
Reflecting this breadth, Trading 212 earns 5 stars for Range of Investments and ranks #15 out of 63 brokers, while Tickmill scores 3.5 stars and ranks #30. Pick Trading 212 if you want a large menu of stocks and forex pairs. Choose Tickmill if you value copy trading and are comfortable with a smaller, CFD-focused selection.
| Feature |
Tickmill
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 637 | 7868 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 63 | 146 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | Yes |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | No | Yes |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | No |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
Tickmill and Trading 212 both offer free demo (paper) accounts and let you trade directly from charts. The big differences are in the platforms. Trading 212 provides its own in-house web platform but doesn’t offer a Windows desktop download, nor MetaTrader. Tickmill does not have a proprietary platform, but it supports MetaTrader 4 (MT4) and MetaTrader 5 (MT5), offers a Windows desktop platform, a web platform, and enables copy trading—features Trading 212 does not include.
Both brokers earn 4 out of 5 stars for Trading Platforms and Tools. In ForexBrokers.com’s rankings out of 63 brokers, Trading 212 sits at #19 while Tickmill is #24. Choose Trading 212 if you prefer a clean, proprietary web experience with a demo account. Pick Tickmill if you want MT4/MT5, copy trading, and a Windows desktop option alongside web access.
| Feature |
Tickmill
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | No | Yes |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 91 | 54 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
Comparing Tickmill vs Trading 212 for mobile trading, both brokers offer iPhone and Android apps with price alerts, trendline drawing, and auto-saving chart annotations. If you switch between phone and web, Trading 212 stands out because watchlists sync across devices, while Tickmill’s do not. Charting depth also differs: Tickmill includes 30 technical studies, whereas Trading 212 offers 104, giving active chartists more indicators to work with.
Both apps earn 4 out of 5 stars for Mobile Trading Apps, yet ForexBrokers.com ranks Trading 212 higher (#17 of 63) than Tickmill (#25 of 63). Choose Trading 212 if you value synced watchlists and a larger indicator library; pick Tickmill if you want a straightforward mobile trading experience with essential tools and alerts on both iPhone and Android.
| Feature |
Tickmill
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | No | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 30 | 104 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
Comparing market research, Tickmill stands out by offering daily market commentary and extra tools from Acuity Trading (such as Signal Centre), while Trading 212 does not provide daily commentary and lacks Acuity Trading integrations. Both brokers deliver forex news from top-tier sources, include a sentiment tool that shows the ratio of long and short positions, and feature an economic calendar. Neither platform includes Autochartist, Trading Central, or TipRanks.
For ratings, ForexBrokers.com gives Tickmill 4 stars and ranks it 19th out of 63 brokers for Research, while Trading 212 earns 3.5 stars and ranks 32nd. If you want daily insights and added third-party signals, Tickmill has the edge; if you mainly need news, sentiment data, and a calendar, both brokers cover those basics.
| Feature |
Tickmill
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes |
| Autochartist | No | No |
| Trading Central | No | No |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes |
| TipRanks | No | No |
| Acuity Trading | Yes | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
Tickmill and Trading 212 both cater to beginners with at least 10 video lessons that cover the basics of trading, and each also includes advanced videos for when you’re ready to go deeper. A key difference is live education: Tickmill hosts client webinars at least once a month, while Trading 212 does not offer ongoing educational webinars. If you like learning in real time and asking questions, that live format can be a major plus.
On overall education quality, Tickmill holds a 4 out of 5 star rating and ranks #14 out of 63 brokers for Education at ForexBrokers.com. Trading 212 earns 3.5 out of 5 stars and ranks #20. For beginners, that means both brokers provide meaningful learning paths, but Tickmill’s regular webinars and higher ranking may give it the edge if you want more guided support.
| Feature |
Tickmill
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | Yes | No |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that Tickmill is better than Trading 212. Tickmill finished with an overall rank of #23, while Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #25.
Tickmill is a run-of-the-mill MetaTrader broker that offers a limited selection of tradeable securities. The broker does offer very competitive commission-based pricing for professionals through its VIP and Pro accounts.
| Feature |
Tickmill
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 86 | 80 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Trading Fees |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
Tickmill vs Trading 212: neither broker offers buying actual (delivered) cryptocurrencies, but both allow buying cryptocurrency CFDs.
Comparing deposit and withdrawal methods, Tickmill supports PayPal, Skrill, and bank wire transfers but not ACH/SEPA, while Trading 212 supports ACH/SEPA, PayPal, and bank wire transfers but not Skrill (Visa/Mastercard availability unspecified for both).
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 86 | 80 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Tickmill Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Broker Screenshots | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
|
|
| Regulation | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 86 | 80 | |
| Year Founded | 2014 | 2004 | |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No | |
| Bank | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes | |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 2 | 3 | |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 2 | 0 | |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 1 | 0 |
| Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (ASIC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Canada (CIRO Authorised) | No | No | |
| Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Japan (FSA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Singapore (MAS Authorised) | No | No | |
| Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | |||
| United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | Yes | Yes | |
| USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | No | |
| New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes |
| Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya (CMA Authorised) | |||
| Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | No | |
| South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| UAE (DFSA, FSRA, or SCA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| India (SEBI Authorised) | No | No | |
| Jordan (JSC Authorised) |
| Investments | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 637 | 7868 | |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 63 | 146 | |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | Yes | |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | No | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
| Cost | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 1.70 | 2.7 | |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.70 | 2.7 | |
| Inactivity Fee | No | No | |
| Order execution: Agency | Yes | Yes | |
| Order execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
| Funding | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $100 | €1 | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| Non-wire bank transfer | No | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | No | Yes | |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No | |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No | |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No | |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No | |
| cTrader | No | No |
| Trading Tools | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
| Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 91 | 54 | |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
| Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Trading | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Watchlist [DELETED] | |||
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | No | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 30 | 104 | |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Research - Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Research | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No | |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes | |
| Autochartist | No | No | |
| Trading Central | No | No | |
| TipRanks | No | No | |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Education | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | Yes | No | |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Major Forex Pairs | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GBP/USD [DELETED] | |||
| USD/JPY [DELETED] | |||
| EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/CHF [DELETED] | |||
| USD/CAD [DELETED] | |||
| NZD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| AUD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| Review | Tickmill Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Overall | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 86 | 80 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Tickmill Review | Trading 212 Review |
IG
CMC Markets
FOREX.com
XTB
eToro
AvaTrade
Pepperstone
FP Markets
Tickmill