Tickmill vs Trading 212 2026
In this head to head comparison of Tickmill vs Trading 212, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
In this head to head comparison of Tickmill vs Trading 212, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Tickmill vs Trading 212: Tickmill was founded in 2014, while Trading 212 dates back to 2004. Neither broker is publicly traded or a bank. Based on ForexBrokers.com’s Trust Score scale (where 80–89 is “trusted”), Tickmill scores 85 and Trading 212 scores 82—meaning both are considered trusted.
Looking at regulatory information, Tickmill holds 2 Tier-1 licenses (highly trusted) and 2 Tier-2 licenses (trusted). Trading 212 holds 3 Tier-1 licenses and 0 Tier-2 licenses. In short, Trading 212 has more top-tier authorizations, while Tickmill combines top- and mid-tier licensing; both meet trusted standards for safety and oversight.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2014 | 2004 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 2 | 3 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 2 | 0 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 1 | 0 |
Tickmill comes out ahead of Trading 212 for commissions and fees, especially for active forex and CFD traders. Tickmill offers two main account types: Classic, which is commission-free but has higher spreads, and Raw, which charges a $3 commission per side per standard lot and is designed for lower overall trading costs. On its Raw account, Tickmill typically shows very tight spreads, and even with the commission added in, the total cost can still be competitive. Tickmill is rated 4.5/5 stars for commissions and fees and ranks #10 out of 36 brokers.
Trading 212 also promotes zero-commission trading on its CFD account, but traders still pay the spread, which is where the cost can add up. Its published average EUR/USD spread of 2.7 pips in April 2025 is notably higher than what many top brokers charge, making it less appealing on price for forex and CFD trading. Trading 212 is rated 4/5 stars for commissions and fees and ranks #29 out of 36 brokers.
In simple terms, Tickmill generally offers better value if low trading costs are your main priority, while Trading 212 may be easier to understand at first glance because it advertises zero commission. However, once spreads are factored in, Tickmill’s Raw account tends to be the cheaper choice for active traders.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $100 | €1 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Spread-only account | 1.70 | 2.7 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Raw spread account | 0.70 | 2.7 |
| Non-wire bank transfer (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
When it comes to range of investments, Trading 212 offers a much wider choice than Tickmill. Tickmill provides 637 tradeable symbols and 62 forex pairs, while Trading 212 lists about 13,000 tradeable symbols and 180 forex pairs. Both brokers support forex trading as CFDs or spot contracts, and both offer cryptocurrency CFDs. However, Tickmill does not let clients buy real shares on U.S. or international exchanges, while Trading 212 does, giving access to exchange traded stocks such as Apple and Vodafone. Trading 212 also supports buying actual cryptocurrency, which Tickmill does not.
Tickmill does have copy trading, which Trading 212 does not. Even so, Trading 212 comes out ahead for overall investment choice, with a 5-star rating for Range of Investments and a ForexBrokers.com rank of 14th out of 36 brokers. Tickmill is rated 3.5 stars and ranks 32nd out of 36, making it the more limited option for traders and investors looking for variety.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 637 | 13000 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 62 | 180 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | Yes |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | No | Yes |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | Yes |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
Tickmill and Trading 212 both give traders a free demo account, web-based platform access, and the option to place trades directly from a stock chart. Each broker is also rated 4 out of 5 stars for trading platforms and tools, so both offer a solid setup for everyday trading needs. However, Tickmill has a wider platform range overall, with a Windows desktop app, MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, and copy trading available, while Trading 212 does not support a desktop download, MT4, MT5, or copy trading.
For traders who want more platform choice and the familiar feel of MetaTrader, Tickmill has the edge. Trading 212 is simpler and still works well for web-based trading and chart-based order entry, but it is more limited in advanced platform options. In ForexBrokers.com’s Trading Platforms and Tools rankings, Trading 212 places higher at #19 out of 36 brokers, compared with Tickmill at #24.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | No | No |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 97 | 102 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
Tickmill and Trading 212 both offer mobile trading apps for iPhone and Android, so either broker gives you access on the go. Each app also lets you sync watchlists between the mobile app and your online account, and both support drawing trendlines on charts. In ForexBrokers.com’s Mobile Trading Apps review, each broker earns 4 out of 5 stars, showing that both deliver a solid mobile trading experience.
There are a few clear differences to keep in mind. Trading 212 stands out with stock and forex price alerts, while Tickmill does not offer them. Trading 212 also provides more chart studies in its mobile app, with 104 compared to Tickmill’s 97, and it can auto-save chart drawings, which Tickmill cannot. Based on ForexBrokers.com rankings, Trading 212 places higher in the mobile category at #17 out of 36 brokers, while Tickmill ranks #25 out of 36.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | No | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 97 | 104 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | No | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
When comparing Tickmill vs Trading 212 for market research, Tickmill has the edge overall. Tickmill offers daily market commentary, research tools from Acuity Trading such as Signal Centre, and an economic calendar with global news events. It does not provide forex news from top sources like Bloomberg or Reuters, and it does not include tools from Autochartist, Trading Central, or TipRanks. Even so, its research offering is rated 4 out of 5 stars and ranks #19 out of 36 brokers for Research.
Trading 212 takes a different approach. It does not offer daily market commentary, Autochartist, Trading Central, TipRanks, or Acuity Trading tools, but it does provide forex news from top-tier sources such as Bloomberg, Reuters, and Dow Jones, along with a sentiment tool and an economic calendar. Its research score is 3.5 out of 5 stars, and it ranks #31 out of 36 brokers, placing it behind Tickmill for overall market research.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | No | Yes |
| Autochartist | No | No |
| Trading Central | No | No |
| Client sentiment data | No | Yes |
| TipRanks | No | No |
| Acuity Trading | Yes | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
When it comes to learning tools for beginners, Tickmill comes out ahead of Trading 212 in a few key ways. Tickmill offers forex and CFD education with at least 10 learning pieces focused on those markets, and it also runs online educational webinars for clients at least once a month. Trading 212 also provides forex and CFD education, along with 10 or more beginner videos and 10 or more advanced videos, but it does not offer monthly educational webinars. For new traders who want regular live learning sessions as part of their education, Tickmill has the edge.
Both brokers give beginners a decent starting point with plenty of video content, but Tickmill earns a higher education rating overall, at 4 out of 5 stars, compared with Trading 212’s 3.5 stars. That difference is reflected in ForexBrokers.com’s rankings too, where Tickmill places 14th out of 36 brokers for Education, while Trading 212 ranks 23rd. If you want a broker with stronger beginner education and more consistent live learning support, Tickmill is the better choice of the two.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | Yes | No |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that Tickmill is better than Trading 212. Tickmill finished with an overall rank of #23, while Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #25.
Tickmill is a run-of-the-mill MetaTrader broker that offers a limited selection of tradeable securities. The broker does offer very competitive commission-based pricing for professionals through its VIP and Pro accounts.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 85 | 82 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Trading Fees |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
Tickmill vs Trading 212: Tickmill offers cryptocurrency trading only via CFDs (no ability to buy actual delivered coins), while Trading 212 supports both buying real cryptocurrencies and trading crypto CFDs.
When comparing Tickmill vs Trading 212 for funding and withdrawals, Tickmill supports PayPal, Skrill, and bank wires but does not offer ACH or SEPA transfers, while Trading 212 supports bank wires but does not offer PayPal or Skrill, and neither broker lists Visa or Mastercard as a deposit or withdrawal option.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 85 | 82 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Tickmill Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Broker Screenshots | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
| Regulation | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 85 | 82 | |
| Year Founded | 2014 | 2004 | |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No | |
| Bank | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes | |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 2 | 3 | |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 2 | 0 | |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 1 | 0 |
| Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (ASIC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Canada (CIRO Authorised) | No | No | |
| Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Japan (FSA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Singapore (MAS Authorised) | No | No | |
| Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | |||
| United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | Yes | Yes | |
| USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | No | |
| New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes |
| Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya (CMA Authorised) | |||
| Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | No | |
| South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| UAE (DFSA, FSRA, or CMA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| India (SEBI Authorised) | No | No | |
| Jordan (JSC Authorised) |
| Investments | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 637 | 13000 | |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 62 | 180 | |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | Yes | |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | No | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | Yes | |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
| Cost | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Spread-only account | 1.70 | 2.7 | |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Raw spread account | 0.70 | 2.7 | |
| Inactivity Fee | No | No | |
| Order execution: Agency | Yes | Yes | |
| Order execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
| Funding | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $100 | €1 | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| Non-wire bank transfer (Deposit/Withdraw) | No |
| Trading Platforms | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | No | No | |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No | |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No | |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No | |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No | |
| cTrader | No | No |
| Trading Tools | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
| Price Alerts | No | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 97 | 102 | |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
| Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Trading | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Price Alerts | No | Yes | |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 97 | 104 | |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | No | Yes | |
| Mobile Research - Economic Calendar | No | Yes |
| Research | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No | |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | No | Yes | |
| Autochartist | No | No | |
| Trading Central | No | No | |
| TipRanks | No | No | |
| Client sentiment data | No | Yes | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Education | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | Yes | No | |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Major Forex Pairs | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| Review | Tickmill Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Overall | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 85 | 82 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Tickmill Review | Trading 212 Review |