Tickmill vs Trading 212 2025
In this head to head comparison of Tickmill vs Trading 212, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
In this head to head comparison of Tickmill vs Trading 212, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Tickmill, founded in 2014, stands out as a trusted online broker with a Trust Score of 86, indicating a high level of reliability. Although not publicly traded or a bank, Tickmill holds two Tier-1 licenses, which reflects its strong standing in the industry for trustworthiness. In addition, it holds two Tier-2 licenses, further reinforcing its reputation as a secure platform for trading.
Founded in 2004, Trading 212 is also a non-publicly traded online broker which is not classified as a bank. It holds a Trust Score of 80, placing it in the trusted category. Notably, Trading 212 has secured three Tier-1 licenses, demonstrating a commendable level of trust. However, it does not possess any Tier-2 licenses. Both brokers offer a secure trading experience, but a close look at their regulatory licenses and trust scores can help traders make a more informed choice.
Feature |
|
|
---|---|---|
Year Founded | 2014 | 2004 |
Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
Bank | No | No |
Tier-1 Licenses | 2 | 3 |
Tier-2 Licenses | 2 | 0 |
Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
Tier-4 Licenses | 1 | 0 |
Comparing commissions and fees, Tickmill earns 5 out of 5 stars and ranks #4 of 63 brokers for pricing, while Trading 212 earns 4 out of 5 stars and ranks #50 of 63. That gap shows up most clearly in forex and CFD costs, where spread-plus-commission structures often beat “zero-commission” models that rely on wider spreads.
Tickmill offers two account types. The Classic account is commission-free but carries higher average spreads (about 1.76 pips on EUR/USD as of August 2023). The Raw account replaced the Pro and now charges $3 per side ($6 per standard lot, per 100,000 units) with a low $100 minimum deposit. Tickmill lists a typical EUR/USD spread of 0.11 pips (October 2023) on Raw; when you add today’s commission equivalent of 0.6 pips, the all-in cost comes to about 0.71 pips during normal market conditions—still highly competitive for active traders.
Trading 212 has Invest (shares) and CFD accounts; the CFD account advertises zero-commission trading, but you pay the spread. Trading 212’s published averages show an EUR/USD spread of 2.7 pips in April 2025, which is considerably wider than Tickmill’s Raw all-in costs. Minimum deposits are low (1 euro for Invest, 10 euros for CFD), but for pure trading costs—especially in forex—Tickmill’s Raw pricing tends to work out cheaper than Trading 212’s spread-only model.
Feature |
|
|
---|---|---|
Minimum Deposit | $100 | €1 |
Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 1.70 | 2.7 |
All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.70 | 2.7 |
Non-wire bank transfer | No | Yes |
PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
When it comes to the range of investments, Trading 212 offers a much larger lineup than Tickmill. Trading 212 has 7,868 tradeable symbols and 146 forex pairs, while Tickmill lists 637 symbols and 63 forex pairs. That scope helps Trading 212 earn 5 out of 5 stars and a #16 ranking for Range of Investments from ForexBrokers.com, compared with Tickmill’s 3.5 out of 5 stars and #43 ranking.
Both brokers allow forex trading (via CFDs or spot, depending on the account) and support cryptocurrency as CFDs—not the actual coins. The biggest difference is access to exchange-traded securities: Trading 212 lets you buy and sell shares on U.S. and international exchanges (for example, Apple on NASDAQ and Vodafone in London), while Tickmill does not. Tickmill does offer copy trading, which Trading 212 lacks. If you want the widest market selection, Trading 212 is the better fit; if you want copy trading with a more focused set of instruments, consider Tickmill.
Feature |
|
|
---|---|---|
Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 637 | 7868 |
Forex Pairs (Total) | 63 | 146 |
U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | Yes |
Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | No | Yes |
Copy Trading | Yes | No |
Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | No |
Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
Tickmill vs Trading 212: both brokers offer a free demo account and let you place orders directly from charts. The big difference is platform choice. Tickmill does not have its own platform but supports MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5, with both a Windows desktop download and a web platform. Trading 212 delivers its own proprietary web platform, but it does not offer a Windows desktop download and it does not support MT4 or MT5.
Tool-wise, Tickmill adds copy trading, while Trading 212 does not. For Trading Platforms and Tools, both earn 4 out of 5 stars, though ForexBrokers.com ranks Trading 212 higher (#20 of 63) than Tickmill (#30 of 63). Pick Trading 212 if you want an easy, in-house web experience; choose Tickmill if you want MT4/MT5, a desktop app for Windows, or copy trading—both let you practice first with a demo account.
Feature |
|
|
---|---|---|
Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | No | Yes |
Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No |
Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
Copy Trading | Yes | No |
MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No |
MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No |
Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 91 | 54 |
Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
Both Tickmill and Trading 212 offer full-featured mobile trading apps for iPhone and Android. Each app supports price alerts, trendline drawing on charts, and auto-saving of your chart annotations—useful for tracking setups on the go. If you value consistency between devices, note that Trading 212 syncs your watchlist symbols between the mobile app and your online account, while Tickmill does not.
Charting depth is a key difference: Tickmill includes 30 technical studies, whereas Trading 212 offers 104, giving more ways to analyze price action from your phone. In terms of recognition, both apps earn 4 out of 5 stars for mobile trading. However, on ForexBrokers.com’s list of 63 brokers, Trading 212 ranks higher at #17, compared with Tickmill at #30.
Feature |
|
|
---|---|---|
Android App | Yes | Yes |
Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes |
Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | No | Yes |
Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 30 | 104 |
Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
If you’re comparing Tickmill vs Trading 212 for market research, Tickmill stands out for offering daily market commentary, while Trading 212 does not. Both brokers stream forex news from leading sources such as Bloomberg, Reuters, and Dow Jones, and each includes a sentiment tool that shows the ratio of long and short positions. They also provide an economic calendar. However, neither broker integrates research suites from Autochartist or Trading Central.
Tickmill adds research from Acuity Trading (e.g., Signal Centre), which Trading 212 lacks, and neither offers TipRanks. According to ForexBrokers.com, Tickmill earns 4 stars for Research and ranks #21 out of 63 brokers, while Trading 212 earns 3.5 stars and ranks #45. If you value daily commentary and added third-party signals, Tickmill may be the better fit; for basic news and calendar coverage, both platforms are comparable.
Feature |
|
|
---|---|---|
Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No |
Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes |
Autochartist | No | No |
Trading Central | No | No |
Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes |
TipRanks | No | No |
Acuity Trading | Yes | No |
Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
Comparing beginner education at Tickmill vs Trading 212 for forex and CFD trading: both brokers offer sizeable video libraries with at least 10 beginner videos to help you learn the basics, plus 10+ advanced videos for when you’re ready to go further. Independent ratings from ForexBrokers.com place Tickmill ahead for education (4 stars, ranked #15 of 63) compared with Trading 212 (3.5 stars, ranked #21 of 63).
Live learning is the key difference. Tickmill runs client webinars at least once a month, giving newcomers a chance to learn in real time and ask questions. Trading 212 does not currently offer regular educational webinars. If you want ongoing live sessions alongside beginner and advanced videos, Tickmill edges it; if you prefer on‑demand videos only, Trading 212 remains a good option for getting started with forex and CFD education.
Feature |
|
|
---|---|---|
Webinars | Yes | No |
Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that Tickmill is better than Trading 212. Tickmill finished with an overall rank of #22, while Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #31.
Tickmill is a run-of-the-mill MetaTrader broker that offers a limited selection of tradeable securities. The broker does offer very competitive commission-based pricing for professionals through its VIP and Pro accounts.
Feature |
|
|
---|---|---|
Overall Rating |
|
|
Trust Score | 86 | 80 |
Range of Investments |
|
|
Commissions & Fees |
|
|
Platforms & Tools |
|
|
Research |
|
|
Mobile Trading |
|
|
Education |
|
|
Tickmill vs Trading 212: neither broker offers buying actual (delivered) cryptocurrencies, but both allow buying cryptocurrency CFDs.
Comparing deposit and withdrawal methods, Tickmill supports PayPal, Skrill, and bank wire transfers but not ACH/SEPA, while Trading 212 supports ACH/SEPA, PayPal, and bank wire transfers but not Skrill (Visa/Mastercard availability unspecified for both).
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5Overall Rating | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
---|---|---|---|
Overall Rating |
|
| |
Commissions & Fees |
|
| |
Range of Investments |
|
| |
Platforms & Tools |
|
| |
Mobile Trading |
|
| |
Research |
|
| |
Education |
|
| |
Trust Score | 86 | 80 | |
Winner | check_circle | ||
Review | Tickmill Review | Trading 212 Review |
Broker Screenshots | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
---|---|---|---|
Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
Regulation | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
---|---|---|---|
Trust Score | 86 | 80 | |
Year Founded | 2014 | 2004 | |
Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No | |
Bank | No | No | |
Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes | |
Tier-1 Licenses | 2 | 3 | |
Tier-2 Licenses | 2 | 0 | |
Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
Tier-4 Licenses | 1 | 0 |
Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
---|---|---|---|
Australia (ASIC Authorised) | No | No | |
Canada (CIRO Authorised) | No | No | |
Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
Japan (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
Singapore (MAS Authorised) | No | No | |
Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | |||
United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | Yes | Yes | |
USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | No | |
New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | No | |
Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes |
Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
---|---|---|---|
Kenya (CMA Authorised) | |||
Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | No | |
South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
UAE (DFSA, FSRA, or SCA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
India (SEBI Authorised) | No | No | |
Jordan (JSC Authorised) |
Investments | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
---|---|---|---|
Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 637 | 7868 | |
Forex Pairs (Total) | 63 | 146 | |
U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | Yes | |
Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | No | Yes | |
Copy Trading | Yes | No | |
Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | No | |
Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Cost | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
---|---|---|---|
Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 1.70 | 2.7 | |
All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.70 | 2.7 | |
Inactivity Fee | No | No | |
Order execution: Agency | Yes | Yes | |
Order execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
Funding | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
---|---|---|---|
Minimum Deposit | $100 | €1 | |
PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
Non-wire bank transfer | No | Yes |
Trading Platforms | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
---|---|---|---|
Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | No | Yes | |
Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No | |
Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
Copy Trading | Yes | No | |
MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No | |
MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No | |
cTrader | No | No |
Trading Tools | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
---|---|---|---|
Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 91 | 54 | |
Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
Mobile Trading | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
---|---|---|---|
Android App | Yes | Yes | |
Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
Mobile Watchlist [DELETED] | |||
Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | No | Yes | |
Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 30 | 104 | |
Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes | |
Mobile Research - Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Research | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
---|---|---|---|
Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No | |
Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes | |
Autochartist | No | No | |
Trading Central | No | No | |
TipRanks | No | No | |
Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes | |
Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Education | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
---|---|---|---|
Webinars | Yes | No | |
Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Major Forex Pairs | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
---|---|---|---|
GBP/USD [DELETED] | |||
USD/JPY [DELETED] | |||
EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
USD/CHF [DELETED] | |||
USD/CAD [DELETED] | |||
NZD/USD [DELETED] | |||
AUD/USD [DELETED] | |||
Review | Tickmill Review | Trading 212 Review |
Overall | Tickmill | Trading 212 | |
---|---|---|---|
Overall Rating |
|
| |
Commissions & Fees |
|
| |
Range of Investments |
|
| |
Platforms & Tools |
|
| |
Mobile Trading |
|
| |
Research |
|
| |
Education |
|
| |
Trust Score | 86 | 80 | |
Winner | check_circle | ||
Review | Tickmill Review | Trading 212 Review |