Written by ForexBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of Capital.com vs Trading 212, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Capital.com vs Trading 212: Capital.com was founded in 2016 and Trading 212 in 2004. Neither broker is publicly traded or a bank. On ForexBrokers.com’s 99-point Trust Score, Capital.com scores 89 and Trading 212 scores 82—both in the trusted 80–89 band (90–99 highly trusted, 70–79 average risk, 60–69 high risk, under 59 not trusted).
Regulation and licenses: Both brokers hold 3 Tier-1 licenses (viewed as highly trusted). Capital.com also holds 3 Tier-2 licenses (trusted), while Trading 212 holds none. This added licensing depth helps explain Capital.com’s slightly higher Trust Score.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2016 | 2004 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 3 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 3 | 0 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 2 | 0 |
Comparing commissions and fees, Capital.com generally beats Trading 212 on pricing for forex and CFDs. Capital.com earns 5 out of 5 stars and ranks #3 of 63 brokers for Commissions and Fees at ForexBrokers.com, while Trading 212 scores 4 out of 5 stars and ranks #27 of 63. Both brokers advertise competitive pricing, but the actual spreads tell a different story for frequent traders focused on costs.
Capital.com offers a universal account for retail traders and a professional account for qualified clients (note: professional status comes with fewer regulatory protections). Its EUR/USD average spread was 0.6712 pips in April 2024—lower than the industry average—making it a strong choice for low-cost forex trading. Overall pricing is slightly better than the industry average, supporting its 5-star rating and top-three ranking.
Trading 212 offers two accounts: Invest (shares) with a €1 minimum and CFD with a €10 minimum. While Trading 212 advertises zero-commission trading, you still pay the spread on CFDs and forex. The broker now publishes average spread data; in April 2025, its EUR/USD average spread was 2.7 pips, which is well above the industry average and less competitive than leaders like Capital.com. That pricing profile aligns with its 4-star rating and #27 ranking for Commissions and Fees.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $20 | €1 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 0.64 | 2.7 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.67 | 2.7 |
| Non-wire bank transfer | No | Yes |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
Capital.com vs Trading 212: for range of investments, Trading 212 offers the larger lineup with about 13,000 tradeable symbols and 180 forex pairs, while Capital.com lists 5,585 symbols and 125 forex pairs. Both brokers let you trade forex (as CFDs or spot, depending on product and region), and both support crypto CFDs.
If you want to buy real shares, Trading 212 offers exchange-traded securities on both U.S. and international markets, so you can purchase stocks like Apple (AAPL) and Vodafone (VOD). Capital.com does not offer exchange-traded stocks and focuses on derivatives. For crypto, Trading 212 lets you buy actual coins as well as crypto CFDs; Capital.com offers crypto only as CFDs. Neither broker supports copy trading. Based on ForexBrokers.com, Capital.com is rated 4.5/5 stars and ranks 18th out of 63 for Range of Investments, while Trading 212 earns 5/5 stars and ranks 15th.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 5585 | 13000 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 125 | 180 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | Yes |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | No | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | No |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | Yes |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
Capital.com and Trading 212 both offer free demo (paper) accounts and web-based trading, and each lets you place trades directly from charts. Neither supports copy trading. Capital.com also provides its own in-house platform and a downloadable Windows desktop app, plus access to MetaTrader 4 (MT4) and MetaTrader 5 (MT5). Trading 212 sticks to the browser experience, with no Windows download and no MT4 or MT5 support.
For platform quality, ForexBrokers.com rates Capital.com 4.5/5 and ranks it #10 out of 63 brokers, while Trading 212 earns 4/5 and ranks #19. In short, choose Capital.com if you want a desktop app and MetaTrader compatibility alongside a web platform; go with Trading 212 if a simple browser platform with chart trading and a free practice account fits your needs.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | No |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | No |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 97 | 102 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
Capital.com and Trading 212 both offer mobile trading apps for iPhone and Android. Each app supports price alerts, drawing trend lines on charts, and auto-saving your drawings. In third-party evaluations, Capital.com earns 4.5 out of 5 stars and ranks #11 out of 63 brokers for Mobile Trading Apps on ForexBrokers.com, while Trading 212 scores 4 out of 5 stars and ranks #17.
For charting depth, Trading 212 stands out with 104 technical studies versus Capital.com’s 30. Trading 212 also syncs your watchlist symbols between the app and your online account, while Capital.com does not. Choose Trading 212 if you want more indicators and seamless watchlist syncing across devices; pick Capital.com if you prefer a higher-rated app with streamlined tools and features.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | No | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 30 | 104 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
When comparing market research, Capital.com pulls ahead of Trading 212 thanks to daily market commentary that keeps you updated without extra effort. Both brokers deliver forex news from top-tier sources (such as Bloomberg, Reuters, or Dow Jones), offer sentiment tools that show the ratio of long vs. short positions, and include an economic calendar for tracking key events. Neither platform integrates third-party suites like Autochartist, Trading Central, Acuity Trading (Signal Centre), or TipRanks.
These differences show up in the scores: Capital.com is rated 4.5 out of 5 for Research and ranks #14 out of 63 brokers at ForexBrokers.com, while Trading 212 scores 3.5 out of 5 and ranks #32. If you want frequent insights with strong news coverage, Capital.com is the better fit; if you just need the basics—news, sentiment, and a calendar—Trading 212 still gets the job done.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes |
| Autochartist | No | No |
| Trading Central | No | No |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes |
| TipRanks | No | No |
| Acuity Trading | No | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
Comparing Capital.com vs Trading 212 for beginner education: both brokers make it easy to get started with trading lessons you can watch on your own time. Each offers at least 10 beginner videos plus 10+ advanced videos, covering practical topics like how markets work, risk control, and strategy basics, including forex and CFD themes. Neither broker runs monthly live client webinars, so most learning is on-demand through videos and articles.
Capital.com stands out for overall quality, earning 4.5/5 stars and ranking #8 out of 63 brokers for Education at ForexBrokers.com. Trading 212 scores 3.5/5 stars and ranks #20. If you want a richer, more structured path as you progress, Capital.com is the stronger choice. If you just need straightforward how‑to videos and a simple library to learn the basics, Trading 212 will suit you fine.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | No |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that Capital.com is better than Trading 212. Capital.com finished with an overall rank of #12, while Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #25.
Capital.com stands out for its quality research, strong educational content, and innovative web platform. Capital.com holds fewer regulatory licenses and offers a narrower range of markets than some of the best brokers, but still significantly outperforms the industry average.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 89 | 82 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Trading Fees |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
In the Capital.com vs Trading 212 comparison, Trading 212 lets you buy actual (delivered) cryptocurrency and also offers crypto CFDs, while Capital.com does not support buying delivered crypto but does provide cryptocurrency CFDs.
Capital.com vs Trading 212: Capital.com supports PayPal and Skrill alongside bank wires but not ACH/SEPA for deposits and withdrawals, while Trading 212 supports ACH/SEPA and bank wires but not PayPal or Skrill; Visa/Mastercard availability was not specified for either broker.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | Capital.com | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 89 | 82 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Capital.com Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Broker Screenshots | Capital.com | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
|
|
| Regulation | Capital.com | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 89 | 82 | |
| Year Founded | 2016 | 2004 | |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No | |
| Bank | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes | |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 3 | |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 3 | 0 | |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 2 | 0 |
| Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | Capital.com | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (ASIC Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| Canada (CIRO Authorised) | No | No | |
| Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Japan (FSA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Singapore (MAS Authorised) | No | No | |
| Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | |||
| United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | Yes | Yes | |
| USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | No | |
| New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes |
| Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | Capital.com | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya (CMA Authorised) | Yes | ||
| Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | No | |
| South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | No | No | |
| UAE (DFSA, FSRA, or CMA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| India (SEBI Authorised) | No | No | |
| Jordan (JSC Authorised) |
| Investments | Capital.com | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 5585 | 13000 | |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 125 | 180 | |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | Yes | |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | No | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | No | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | Yes | |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
| Cost | Capital.com | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 0.64 | 2.7 | |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.67 | 2.7 | |
| Inactivity Fee | No | No | |
| Order execution: Agency | No | Yes | |
| Order execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
| Funding | Capital.com | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $20 | €1 | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| Non-wire bank transfer | No | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | Capital.com | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | No | |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No | |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | No | No | |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No | |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No | |
| cTrader | No | No |
| Trading Tools | Capital.com | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
| Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 97 | 102 | |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
| Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Trading | Capital.com | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Watchlist [DELETED] | |||
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | No | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 30 | 104 | |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Research - Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Research | Capital.com | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No | |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes | |
| Autochartist | No | No | |
| Trading Central | No | No | |
| TipRanks | No | No | |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Education | Capital.com | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | No | |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Major Forex Pairs | Capital.com | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GBP/USD [DELETED] | |||
| USD/JPY [DELETED] | |||
| EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/CHF [DELETED] | |||
| USD/CAD [DELETED] | |||
| NZD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| AUD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| Review | Capital.com Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Overall | Capital.com | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 89 | 82 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Capital.com Review | Trading 212 Review |
IG
FOREX.com
CMC Markets
XTB
eToro
AvaTrade
Pepperstone
FP Markets
Tickmill