Written by ForexBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of Capital.com vs Trading 212, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Capital.com vs Trading 212: Capital.com was founded in 2016, while Trading 212 dates back to 2004. Neither broker is publicly traded or a bank. Both list 3 Tier-1 regulatory licenses, the level ForexBrokers.com classifies as highly trusted.
According to ForexBrokers.com, Capital.com has a Trust Score of 87/99 and Trading 212 scores 80/99—both fall into the “trusted” 80–89 range (90–99 highly trusted, 70–79 average risk, 60–69 high risk, under 59 not trusted). Capital.com also holds 2 Tier-2 (trusted) licenses, while Trading 212 holds none, which may matter if you prefer a broader set of regulatory approvals.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2016 | 2004 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 3 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 2 | 0 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 2 | 0 |
Comparing commissions and fees, Capital.com generally beats Trading 212 on pricing for forex and CFDs. Capital.com earns 5 out of 5 stars and ranks #3 of 63 brokers for Commissions and Fees at ForexBrokers.com, while Trading 212 scores 4 out of 5 stars and ranks #27 of 63. Both brokers advertise competitive pricing, but the actual spreads tell a different story for frequent traders focused on costs.
Capital.com offers a universal account for retail traders and a professional account for qualified clients (note: professional status comes with fewer regulatory protections). Its EUR/USD average spread was 0.6712 pips in April 2024—lower than the industry average—making it a strong choice for low-cost forex trading. Overall pricing is slightly better than the industry average, supporting its 5-star rating and top-three ranking.
Trading 212 offers two accounts: Invest (shares) with a €1 minimum and CFD with a €10 minimum. While Trading 212 advertises zero-commission trading, you still pay the spread on CFDs and forex. The broker now publishes average spread data; in April 2025, its EUR/USD average spread was 2.7 pips, which is well above the industry average and less competitive than leaders like Capital.com. That pricing profile aligns with its 4-star rating and #27 ranking for Commissions and Fees.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $20 | €1 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 0.64 | 2.7 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.67 | 2.7 |
| Non-wire bank transfer | No | Yes |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
Capital.com and Trading 212 both offer forex trading as a CFD or spot contract. Trading 212 lists 7,868 tradeable symbols and 146 forex pairs, compared with Capital.com’s 5,585 symbols and 125 pairs. Both platforms support cryptocurrency CFDs, but neither lets you buy actual crypto, and neither offers copy trading.
For exchange-traded securities (not CFDs), Trading 212 provides access to U.S. and international shares, so you can directly buy stocks like Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) and Vodafone (LSE: VOD). Capital.com does not offer direct share dealing. In ForexBrokers.com’s Range of Investments ratings, Capital.com scores 4.5/5 stars and ranks #18 of 63 brokers, while Trading 212 earns 5/5 stars and ranks #15 of 63.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 5585 | 7868 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 125 | 146 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | Yes |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | No | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | No |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | No |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
Capital.com vs Trading 212: both brokers offer free demo (paper) trading and easy-to-use proprietary platforms you can access in your browser. Each supports trading straight from charts and both skip copy trading. Platform availability is a key difference: Capital.com offers a Windows desktop download and also supports MetaTrader 4 (MT4), while Trading 212 does not have a Windows desktop platform and does not support MT4. Neither broker offers MetaTrader 5 (MT5).
For trading platforms and tools, Capital.com earns 4.5 out of 5 stars and ranks #10 out of 63 brokers on ForexBrokers.com, while Trading 212 scores 4 out of 5 stars and ranks #19. If you want MT4 and a downloadable Windows platform, Capital.com is the better fit. If you’re content with a proprietary, web-based experience and a free demo account, Trading 212 is also a solid choice.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | No |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | No |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 97 | 54 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
Capital.com and Trading 212 both offer mobile trading apps for iPhone and Android. Each app supports price alerts, drawing trend lines on charts, and auto-saving your drawings. In third-party evaluations, Capital.com earns 4.5 out of 5 stars and ranks #11 out of 63 brokers for Mobile Trading Apps on ForexBrokers.com, while Trading 212 scores 4 out of 5 stars and ranks #17.
For charting depth, Trading 212 stands out with 104 technical studies versus Capital.com’s 30. Trading 212 also syncs your watchlist symbols between the app and your online account, while Capital.com does not. Choose Trading 212 if you want more indicators and seamless watchlist syncing across devices; pick Capital.com if you prefer a higher-rated app with streamlined tools and features.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | No | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 30 | 104 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
Comparing Capital.com vs Trading 212 for market research, Capital.com stands out for offering daily market commentary and TipRanks insights, while Trading 212 does not provide daily commentary or TipRanks. Both brokers deliver forex news from top-tier sources such as Bloomberg, Reuters, or Dow Jones, and each includes a sentiment tool that shows the split between long and short positions, along with an economic calendar. Neither platform currently integrates Autochartist, Trading Central, or Acuity Trading tools.
On performance metrics, Capital.com earns 4.5 out of 5 stars for research and ranks #14 out of 63 brokers on ForexBrokers.com. Trading 212 scores 3.5 out of 5 stars and ranks #32. If daily commentary and TipRanks matter to you, Capital.com has the edge; if you just need headline news, sentiment data, and a calendar, both platforms cover the basics.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes |
| Autochartist | No | No |
| Trading Central | No | No |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes |
| TipRanks | Yes | No |
| Acuity Trading | No | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
Comparing Capital.com vs Trading 212 for beginner education: both brokers make it easy to get started with trading lessons you can watch on your own time. Each offers at least 10 beginner videos plus 10+ advanced videos, covering practical topics like how markets work, risk control, and strategy basics, including forex and CFD themes. Neither broker runs monthly live client webinars, so most learning is on-demand through videos and articles.
Capital.com stands out for overall quality, earning 4.5/5 stars and ranking #8 out of 63 brokers for Education at ForexBrokers.com. Trading 212 scores 3.5/5 stars and ranks #20. If you want a richer, more structured path as you progress, Capital.com is the stronger choice. If you just need straightforward how‑to videos and a simple library to learn the basics, Trading 212 will suit you fine.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | No |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that Capital.com is better than Trading 212. Capital.com finished with an overall rank of #12, while Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #25.
Capital.com stands out for its quality research, strong educational content, and innovative web platform. Capital.com holds fewer regulatory licenses and offers a narrower range of markets than some of the best brokers, but still significantly outperforms the industry average.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 87 | 80 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Trading Fees |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
Capital.com vs Trading 212: neither broker lets you buy actual (delivered) cryptocurrency, but both support trading cryptocurrency CFDs.
Capital.com vs Trading 212: For deposits and withdrawals, Trading 212 supports ACH/SEPA while Capital.com does not; both brokers accept PayPal and bank wire transfers, only Capital.com offers Skrill, and Visa/Mastercard availability is not specified for either.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | Capital.com | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 87 | 80 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Capital.com Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Broker Screenshots | Capital.com | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
IG
CMC Markets
FOREX.com
XTB
eToro
AvaTrade
Pepperstone
FP Markets
Tickmill