Written by ForexBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of Capital.com vs Trading 212, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Capital.com vs Trading 212: Capital.com was founded in 2016 and Trading 212 in 2004. Neither broker is publicly traded or a bank. On ForexBrokers.com’s 99-point Trust Score, Capital.com scores 89 and Trading 212 scores 82—both in the trusted 80–89 band (90–99 highly trusted, 70–79 average risk, 60–69 high risk, under 59 not trusted).
Regulation and licenses: Both brokers hold 3 Tier-1 licenses (viewed as highly trusted). Capital.com also holds 3 Tier-2 licenses (trusted), while Trading 212 holds none. This added licensing depth helps explain Capital.com’s slightly higher Trust Score.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2016 | 2004 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 3 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 3 | 0 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 2 | 0 |
When comparing commissions and fees, Capital.com comes out ahead of Trading 212 for low-cost trading. Capital.com offers a retail account and a professional account for eligible traders, and its pricing is slightly better than the industry average overall. Its average EUR/USD spread was 0.6712 pips in April 2024, which is a strong result for forex traders looking to keep costs down. Capital.com earns 5 out of 5 stars for commissions and fees and ranks #3 out of 36 brokers in this category.
Trading 212 also markets zero-commission trading, but that does not remove the spread, which is the real cost to watch in CFD and forex trading. For its CFD account, Trading 212 reported an average EUR/USD spread of 2.7 pips in April 2025, which is well above the industry average and makes it less competitive on pricing than Capital.com. Trading 212 earns 4 out of 5 stars for commissions and fees and ranks #28 out of 36 brokers.
In simple terms, if lower trading fees are your priority, Capital.com is the better pick of the two. Trading 212 may still appeal to traders who like its account setup and zero-commission message, but its wider spreads mean it is usually more expensive for CFD and forex trades.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $20 | €1 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 0.7 | 2.7 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.67 | 2.7 |
| Non-wire bank transfer | No | Yes |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
When it comes to range of investments, Capital.com and Trading 212 both let clients trade forex as CFDs, but Trading 212 offers a wider overall selection. Capital.com lists 5,585 tradable symbols and 125 forex pairs, while Trading 212 provides 13,000 tradable symbols and 180 forex pairs. Trading 212 also stands out by offering exchange traded securities on both U.S. and international markets, so investors can buy real shares such as Apple or Vodafone. Capital.com does not offer direct share dealing on listed exchanges.
For crypto, both brokers offer cryptocurrency CFDs, but only Trading 212 lets users buy actual cryptocurrency rather than just a derivative. Neither broker offers copy trading. Based on ForexBrokers.com’s Range of Investments category, Capital.com is rated 4.5 out of 5 stars and ranked #18 out of 36 brokers, while Trading 212 scores 5 out of 5 stars and ranks #15, making it the stronger choice for investors looking for a broader mix of assets.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 5585 | 13000 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 125 | 180 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | Yes |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | No | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | No |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | Yes |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
Capital.com and Trading 212 both give traders a free demo account, a web-based platform, and the option to trade directly from charts, making each one easy to use for practice and live trading. Capital.com goes further with its own in-house platform, a Windows desktop app, and support for both MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5, which may appeal to traders who want more platform choice and advanced tools. Trading 212 does not offer a desktop download or MetaTrader support, but it still covers the basics well for everyday trading in a browser.
In ratings for trading platforms and tools, Capital.com comes out ahead with 4.5 out of 5 stars and a ForexBrokers.com ranking of #10 out of 36 brokers, compared with Trading 212’s 4 stars and #19 ranking. Neither broker offers copy trading, so the main difference is in platform variety and extras. For traders who want more built-in options and third-party software access, Capital.com has the edge; for those who prefer a simpler web-based setup, Trading 212 remains a solid choice.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | No |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | No |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 97 | 102 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
Capital.com and Trading 212 both offer mobile trading apps for iPhone and Android, and each app includes stock and forex price alerts, trendline drawing, and auto-saving for chart drawings. For everyday mobile trading needs, both platforms cover the basics well and make it easy to monitor markets on the go.
The main differences come down to syncing and chart tools. Trading 212 lets watchlists sync between the mobile app and online account, while Capital.com does not. Capital.com offers 30 technical studies in its app, but Trading 212 provides 104, giving it more charting options. Even so, Capital.com is rated slightly higher for mobile trading apps at 4.5 out of 5 stars and is ranked #11 out of 36 brokers by ForexBrokers.com, compared with Trading 212’s 4 stars and #17 ranking.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | No | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 30 | 104 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
When comparing Capital.com vs Trading 212 for market research, Capital.com comes out ahead overall. Both brokers offer forex news from top sources like Bloomberg, Reuters, or Dow Jones, plus a sentiment tool that shows long and short positioning and an economic calendar with upcoming global events. Neither broker includes research tools from Autochartist, Trading Central, TipRanks, or Acuity Trading.
The biggest difference is that Capital.com provides daily market commentary, while Trading 212 does not. That extra layer of insight helps explain why Capital.com is rated 4.5 out of 5 for Research and ranked #14 out of 36 brokers by ForexBrokers.com, compared with Trading 212’s 3.5 out of 5 rating and #33 ranking. If market analysis matters to you, Capital.com offers the stronger research package.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes |
| Autochartist | No | No |
| Trading Central | No | No |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes |
| TipRanks | No | No |
| Acuity Trading | No | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
For beginners looking to learn the basics, both Capital.com and Trading 212 offer a solid range of educational content. Each platform provides at least 10 beginner-friendly videos, along with at least 10 advanced videos for more experienced traders, and both also cover forex or CFD education with at least 10 related learning pieces. Neither broker offers monthly live educational webinars, so users will mainly rely on videos, articles, and other on-demand materials.
That said, Capital.com comes out ahead for education overall. It has a 4.5-star education rating and ranks #8 out of 36 brokers in the ForexBrokers.com education category, while Trading 212 holds a 3.5-star rating and ranks #20. In simple terms, both brokers can help new traders get started, but Capital.com appears to offer the stronger learning experience.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | No |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that Capital.com is better than Trading 212. Capital.com finished with an overall rank of #12, while Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #25.
Capital.com stands out for its quality research, strong educational content, and innovative web platform. Capital.com holds fewer regulatory licenses and offers a narrower range of markets than some of the best brokers, but still significantly outperforms the industry average.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 89 | 82 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Trading Fees |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
In the Capital.com vs Trading 212 comparison, Trading 212 lets you buy actual (delivered) cryptocurrency and also offers crypto CFDs, while Capital.com does not support buying delivered crypto but does provide cryptocurrency CFDs.
Capital.com vs Trading 212: Capital.com supports PayPal and Skrill alongside bank wires but not ACH/SEPA for deposits and withdrawals, while Trading 212 supports ACH/SEPA and bank wires but not PayPal or Skrill; Visa/Mastercard availability was not specified for either broker.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | Capital.com | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 89 | 82 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Capital.com Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Broker Screenshots | Capital.com | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
|
|
| Regulation | Capital.com | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 89 | 82 | |
| Year Founded | 2016 | 2004 | |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No | |
| Bank | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes | |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 3 | |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 3 | 0 | |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 2 | 0 |
| Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | Capital.com | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (ASIC Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| Canada (CIRO Authorised) | No | No | |
| Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Japan (FSA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Singapore (MAS Authorised) | No | No | |
| Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | |||
| United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | Yes | Yes | |
| USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | No | |
| New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes |
| Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | Capital.com | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya (CMA Authorised) | Yes | ||
| Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | No | |
| South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | No | No | |
| UAE (DFSA, FSRA, or CMA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| India (SEBI Authorised) | No | No | |
| Jordan (JSC Authorised) |
| Investments | Capital.com | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 5585 | 13000 | |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 125 | 180 | |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | Yes | |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | No | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | No | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | Yes | |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
| Cost | Capital.com | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 0.7 | 2.7 | |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.67 | 2.7 | |
| Inactivity Fee | No | No | |
| Order execution: Agency | No | Yes | |
| Order execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
| Funding | Capital.com | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $20 | €1 | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| Non-wire bank transfer | No | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | Capital.com | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | No | |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No | |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | No | No | |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No | |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No | |
| cTrader | No | No |
| Trading Tools | Capital.com | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
| Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 97 | 102 | |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
| Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Trading | Capital.com | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Watchlist [DELETED] | |||
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | No | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 30 | 104 | |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Research - Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Research | Capital.com | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No | |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes | |
| Autochartist | No | No | |
| Trading Central | No | No | |
| TipRanks | No | No | |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Education | Capital.com | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | No | |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Major Forex Pairs | Capital.com | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GBP/USD [DELETED] | |||
| USD/JPY [DELETED] | |||
| EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/CHF [DELETED] | |||
| USD/CAD [DELETED] | |||
| NZD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| AUD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| Review | Capital.com Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Overall | Capital.com | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 89 | 82 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Capital.com Review | Trading 212 Review |
IG
FOREX.com
CMC Markets
XTB
eToro
AvaTrade
Pepperstone
FP Markets
Tickmill