Written by ForexBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of Capital.com vs Trading 212, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Capital.com and Trading 212 are popular online brokers, each with unique strengths in the financial market. Founded in 2016, Capital.com holds three Tier-1 licenses and one Tier-2 license, giving it a ForexBrokers.com Trust Score of 87 out of 99, which places it in the trusted category. Although not a public company or a bank, Capital.com is regarded favorably due to its strong regulatory standing and commitment to security.
Trading 212, established in 2004, also holds three Tier-1 licenses, but no Tier-2 licenses, resulting in a ForexBrokers.com Trust Score of 80. This score still categorizes it as a trusted broker. Like Capital.com, Trading 212 is privately owned and not a banking institution. Both platforms offer clients a secure trading environment, though Capital.com's additional licensing could offer a slightly higher sense of assurance in risk management for users.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2016 | 2004 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 3 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 1 | 0 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 2 | 0 |
Capital.com vs Trading 212 on commissions and fees: Capital.com comes out cheaper for most forex and CFD traders. Capital.com earns 5 out of 5 stars for pricing and ranks #3 out of 63 brokers in the Commissions and Fees category at ForexBrokers.com, while Trading 212 earns 4 out of 5 stars and ranks #50 out of 63.
Capital.com’s pricing centers on tight spreads. Its dynamic spread on EUR/USD averaged 0.6712 pips in April 2024—lower than the industry average—making it attractive for low-cost forex trading. Capital.com offers a single, universal account for retail traders and a separate elective professional account (note: professional clients do not receive the same regulatory protection as retail clients).
Trading 212 advertises zero-commission trading, but you still pay the spread on CFDs and forex. For April 2025, Trading 212’s published average spread on EUR/USD was 2.7 pips, which is higher than the industry average and less competitive than Capital.com for active FX traders. Trading 212 offers two accounts: Invest (shares) with a €1 minimum and CFD with a €10 minimum; this comparison focuses on the CFD account.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $10 | €1 |
| Average Spread EUR/USD - Standard | 0.67 | 2.7 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.67 | 2.7 |
| Active Trader or VIP Discounts [DELETED] | ||
| Non-wire bank transfer | No | Yes |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Visa/Mastercard (Credit/Debit) [DELETED] | ||
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
Trading 212 offers a wider choice of investments, with 7,868 tradeable symbols and 146 forex pairs, compared with Capital.com’s 5,585 symbols and 125 forex pairs. Both brokers provide forex trading and let you trade cryptocurrency through derivatives, but neither supports copy trading or the purchase of actual (delivered) crypto.
If you want to buy real shares, Trading 212 lets you invest in exchange-traded securities on both U.S. and international markets, including names like Apple and Vodafone. Capital.com does not offer real shares, focusing instead on derivatives. Reflecting this coverage, Trading 212 is rated 5 out of 5 stars for Range of Investments and ranks 16th out of 63 brokers, while Capital.com earns 4.5 stars and ranks 23rd.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 5585 | 7868 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 125 | 146 |
| U.S. Stock Trading (Non CFD) | No | Yes |
| Int'l Stock Trading (Non CFD) | No | Yes |
| Social Trading / Copy Trading | No | No |
| Cryptocurrency (Physical) | No | No |
| Cryptocurrency (Derivative) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
Capital.com and Trading 212 both make it easy to get started with a free demo (paper) trading account and each offers a proprietary trading platform built in-house. Capital.com adds a Windows desktop download, while Trading 212 does not. Both brokers provide a web-based platform and let you place trades directly from charts. Copy trading isn’t available at either broker. For third-party software, Capital.com supports MetaTrader 4 (MT4), whereas Trading 212 does not; neither broker offers MT5.
For trading platforms and tools, ForexBrokers.com rates Capital.com at 4.5 stars (ranked #10 of 63) and Trading 212 at 4 stars (ranked #20 of 63). If you want MT4 or a Windows desktop platform, Capital.com is the better fit. If you prefer a streamlined, browser-based experience with a proprietary platform, Trading 212 is a solid pick. In both cases, the free demo account helps you practice before committing real funds.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Social Trading / Copy Trading | No | No |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | No |
| DupliTrade [DELETED] | ||
| ZuluTrade [DELETED] | ||
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 97 | 54 |
| Charting - Drawing Tools (Total) [DELETED] | ||
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
| Watchlists - Total Fields [DELETED] |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
Comparing the mobile trading apps from Capital.com and Trading 212, both are available on iPhone and Android. Each app supports stock and forex price alerts, lets you create watchlists with real-time quotes, and includes charting tools such as trendline drawing with auto-saved annotations. That makes either option practical for tracking the markets on the go.
The differences show up in charting depth and syncing. Capital.com includes 30 technical studies, while Trading 212 offers 104. Only Trading 212 syncs watchlist symbols between the mobile app and your online account; Capital.com does not. According to ForexBrokers.com, Capital.com earns 4.5/5 stars and ranks #11 out of 63 brokers for Mobile Trading Apps, whereas Trading 212 scores 4/5 stars and ranks #17 out of 63. Choose Capital.com if you want a higher-rated app; pick Trading 212 if cross-device watchlist syncing and a larger set of indicators matter most.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Watchlist Syncing | No | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 30 | 104 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Multiple Time Frames | ||
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlist | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
Comparing market research tools, Capital.com offers daily market commentary while Trading 212 does not. Both brokers stream forex news from top-tier sources such as Bloomberg or Reuters and provide a sentiment tool that shows the ratio of long vs. short positions. Capital.com adds market research from TipRanks, which Trading 212 lacks. Both platforms include an economic calendar. Neither broker offers tools from Autochartist, Trading Central, or Acuity Trading.
For research quality, Capital.com is rated 4.5 out of 5 stars and ranks #14 out of 63 brokers on ForexBrokers.com. Trading 212 holds a 3.5-star research rating and ranks #45. If daily commentary and TipRanks insights matter to you, Capital.com delivers more, while both platforms cover the basics like news, sentiment, and calendars.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary | Yes | No |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes |
| Autochartist | No | No |
| Trading Central (Recognia) | No | No |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes |
| TipRanks | Yes | No |
| Signal Centre (Acuity Trading) | No | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
Comparing Capital.com vs Trading 212 for beginner education, Capital.com comes out ahead. It holds a 4.5/5 Education rating and ranks #8 out of 63 brokers on ForexBrokers.com, while Trading 212 scores 3.5/5 and ranks #21. That gap suggests new traders will find more helpful learning support on Capital.com when getting started.
Both brokers provide sizable video libraries, offering at least 10 beginner videos and at least 10 advanced videos on trading topics. If you prefer live instruction, note that neither broker runs monthly client webinars, so most learning is self-paced. For the strongest overall education experience, the ratings favor Capital.com; if you mainly want a solid set of video lessons to begin learning, either platform can work.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Education (Forex or CFDs) | ||
| Webinars | No | No |
| Client Webinars (Archived) [DELETED] | ||
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Investor Dictionary (Glossary) [DELETED] |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that Capital.com is better than Trading 212. Capital.com finished with an overall rank of #10, while Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #31.
Capital.com stands out for its quality research, strong educational content, and innovative web platform. Capital.com holds fewer regulatory licenses and offers a narrower range of markets than some of the best brokers, but still significantly outperforms the industry average.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 87 | 80 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Commissions & Fees |
|
|
| Platforms & Tools |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
Both Capital.com and Trading 212 do not support the purchase of actual cryptocurrency, but they do offer the ability to trade cryptocurrency derivatives, providing users with options for engaging in crypto markets without owning the actual digital coins.
Capital.com vs Trading 212: For deposits and withdrawals, Trading 212 supports ACH/SEPA while Capital.com does not; both brokers accept PayPal and bank wire transfers, only Capital.com offers Skrill, and Visa/Mastercard availability is not specified for either.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | Capital.com | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Commissions & Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Platforms & Tools |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 87 | 80 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Capital.com Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Broker Screenshots | Capital.com | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
IG
CMC Markets
FOREX.com
XTB
eToro
AvaTrade
Plus500
Pepperstone
FP Markets
Tickmill