Trading 212 vs Eightcap 2026
In this head to head comparison of Trading 212 vs Eightcap, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
In this head to head comparison of Trading 212 vs Eightcap, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Trading 212 (founded 2004) and Eightcap (founded 2009) are online brokers that are not publicly traded and are not banks. Both hold three Tier-1 regulatory licenses (highly trusted by ForexBrokers.com). Eightcap also holds one Tier-2 license, while Trading 212 holds none.
On ForexBrokers.comโs 0โ99 Trust Score, Trading 212 scores 82 and Eightcap scores 87โboth in the trusted range of 80โ89. For context, 90โ99 is highly trusted, 70โ79 average risk, 60โ69 high risk, and below 59 should not be trusted at all.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2004 | 2009 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 3 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 0 | 1 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 2 |
Trading 212 and Eightcap both offer competitive pricing in some areas, but they take different approaches to commissions and fees. Trading 212โs CFD account advertises zero-commission trading, but traders still pay the spread on CFDs and forex. Its average EUR/USD spread was 2.7 pips in April 2025, which is well above the industry average and makes it a pricier choice for active forex traders. Trading 212 is rated 4 stars and ranks #29 out of 36 brokers for commissions and fees.
Eightcap gives traders a choice between a commission-based Raw account and a spread-only Standard account. On the Raw account, Eightcap shows an average spread of 0.06 pips, and after the $3.50 per-side commission, the all-in cost comes to about 0.76 pips. That puts it just under the industry average of 0.8 pips, though it is still a bit more expensive than the very cheapest forex brokers. Eightcap is rated 4.5 stars and ranks #20 out of 36 brokers for commissions and fees.
In simple terms, Eightcap offers the better overall value for forex pricing, while Trading 212 may appeal to traders who like its zero-commission message but should watch the wider spreads. If low trading costs are your top priority, Eightcap has the edge in this comparison.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | โฌ1 | $100 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Spread-only account | 2.7 | 1.0 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Raw spread account | 2.7 | 0.76 |
| Non-wire bank transfer (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | Yes |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | Yes |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
When it comes to range of investments, Trading 212 offers far more choice than Eightcap. Trading 212 gives clients access to about 13,000 tradeable symbols and 180 forex pairs, while Eightcap offers 803 symbols and 55 forex pairs. Both brokers let you trade forex as a CFD or spot contract, and both offer cryptocurrency CFDs. However, Trading 212 also stands out by letting users buy actual cryptocurrency, which Eightcap does not provide.
Trading 212 also supports direct share investing on both U.S. and international exchanges, so clients can buy real stocks such as Apple or Vodafone rather than only trading derivatives. Eightcap does not offer exchange traded securities, which makes its investment range much narrower overall. This gap is reflected in ratings and rankings too: Trading 212 scores 5 stars for Range of Investments and ranks #14 out of 36 brokers, while Eightcap receives 3.5 stars and ranks #31.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 13000 | 803 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 180 | 55 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | Yes | No |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | No |
| Copy Trading | No | No |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | Yes | No |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
Trading 212 and Eightcap both give traders a simple web-based platform and a free demo account for paper trading, so beginners can practice before using real money. Both also let you place trades straight from a chart, which makes it easier to act on price moves without switching screens. Neither broker offers a proprietary in-house platform or copy trading, so their platform choices are more focused than some larger competitors.
The biggest difference is on desktop and advanced charting tools. Eightcap offers both MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5, plus a Windows desktop platform, which may appeal to traders who want more familiar third-party software and a downloadable app. Trading 212 does not offer MT4, MT5, or a desktop download, so it is more web-first. Even so, both brokers are rated 4 out of 5 stars for Trading Platforms and Tools, though Trading 212 is ranked higher overall by ForexBrokers.com at #19 versus Eightcap at #34.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | No | No |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | No | Yes |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | No |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | No | Yes |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | Yes |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 102 | 100 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
When comparing Trading 212 vs Eightcap for mobile trading apps, both brokers give traders the basics most people want on the go. Each offers an iPhone app and an Android app, plus stock and forex price alerts, watchlist symbol syncing, trendline drawing on charts, and auto-saving for chart drawings. Both mobile apps are also rated 4 out of 5 stars for mobile trading.
The main difference comes down to charting depth and overall ranking. Trading 212 offers 104 technical studies in its mobile app, slightly more than Eightcapโs 100. It also ranks higher with ForexBrokers.com for mobile trading apps, coming in at #17 out of 36 brokers, compared with Eightcap at #34. For traders looking for a mobile app with a little more charting support and a stronger category ranking, Trading 212 has the edge.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 104 | 100 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
When it comes to market research, Trading 212 and Eightcap both cover the basics, but they do it in different ways. Trading 212 gives traders forex news from top sources like Bloomberg, Reuters, and Dow Jones, plus a sentiment tool and an economic calendar. Eightcap also offers a sentiment tool and an economic calendar, and it goes one step further with daily market commentary and research tools from Acuity Trading, such as Signal Centre. However, Eightcap does not include top-tier forex news sources, and neither broker offers Autochartist, Trading Central, or TipRanks.
Overall, both brokers are rated 3.5 out of 5 stars for research by ForexBrokers.com, but Trading 212 ranks higher at #31 out of 36 brokers, compared with Eightcap at #35. This makes Trading 212 the slightly stronger choice for research, especially if you want access to major forex news outlets, while Eightcap may appeal more to traders who value daily commentary and Acuity Trading tools.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | No | Yes |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | No |
| Autochartist | No | No |
| Trading Central | No | No |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes |
| TipRanks | No | No |
| Acuity Trading | No | Yes |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
When comparing Trading 212 and Eightcap for beginner education, both brokers give new traders a similar starting point in some areas. Each offers at least 10 beginner-focused educational videos, and both are rated 3.5 out of 5 stars for Education. Neither broker provides monthly online educational client webinars, and neither appears to offer the minimum 10 forex- or CFDs-focused educational pieces needed to count as full forex/CFD education support for beginners.
Where Trading 212 stands out is depth: it also offers at least 10 advanced educational videos for more experienced traders, while Eightcap does not. That extra range helps Trading 212 rank higher for Education overall, coming in at #23 out of 36 brokers compared with Eightcapโs #33. For beginners looking for more room to grow, Trading 212 has the edge, while Eightcap still covers the basics but with less advanced learning content.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | No |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | No |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that Trading 212 is better than Eightcap. Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #25, while Eightcap finished with an overall rank of #30.
Best known for its mobile trading app, Trading 212 offers an easy-to-use trading platform suite for CFD and share trading, as well as a large variety of forex pairs. However, despite its well-designed platform and wide range of symbols, its lack of advanced trading tools and flat research offerings hamper Trading 212โs bid to be considered a top broker.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 82 | 87 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Trading Fees |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
Trading 212 lets you buy actual (delivered) cryptocurrency and trade cryptocurrency CFDs, while Eightcap supports only cryptocurrency CFDs and does not offer buying the actual coins.
When comparing Trading 212 vs Eightcap for deposits and withdrawals, both support bank wires and Visa/Mastercard, but Eightcap also offers PayPal and Skrill while Trading 212 supports ACH or SEPA transfers, giving Trading 212 the edge for bank transfer options.
Please note:
We review each brokerโs overall global offering โ a โYesโ checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | Trading 212 | Eightcap | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 82 | 87 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Trading 212 Review | Eightcap Review |
| Broker Screenshots | Trading 212 | Eightcap | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
| Regulation | Trading 212 | Eightcap | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 82 | 87 | |
| Year Founded | 2004 | 2009 | |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No | |
| Bank | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes | |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 3 | |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 0 | 1 | |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 2 |
| Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | Trading 212 | Eightcap | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (ASIC Authorised) | No | Yes | |
| Canada (CIRO Authorised) | No | No | |
| Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Japan (FSA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Singapore (MAS Authorised) | No | No | |
| Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | |||
| United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | Yes | Yes | |
| USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | No | |
| New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes |
| Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | Trading 212 | Eightcap | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya (CMA Authorised) | |||
| Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | No | |
| South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | No | No | |
| UAE (DFSA, FSRA, or CMA Authorised) | No | Yes | |
| India (SEBI Authorised) | No | No | |
| Jordan (JSC Authorised) |
| Investments | Trading 212 | Eightcap | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 13000 | 803 | |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 180 | 55 | |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | Yes | No | |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | No | |
| Copy Trading | No | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | Yes | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
| Cost | Trading 212 | Eightcap | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Spread-only account | 2.7 | 1.0 | |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Raw spread account | 2.7 | 0.76 | |
| Inactivity Fee | No | Yes | |
| Order execution: Agency | Yes | Yes | |
| Order execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
| Funding | Trading 212 | Eightcap | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | โฌ1 | $100 | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | Yes | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | Yes | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| Non-wire bank transfer (Deposit/Withdraw) | No |
| Trading Platforms | Trading 212 | Eightcap | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | No | No | |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | No | Yes | |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | No | No | |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | No | Yes | |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | Yes | |
| cTrader | No | No |
| Trading Tools | Trading 212 | Eightcap | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
| Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 102 | 100 | |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
| Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Trading | Trading 212 | Eightcap | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 104 | 100 | |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Research - Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Research | Trading 212 | Eightcap | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | No | Yes | |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | No | |
| Autochartist | No | No | |
| Trading Central | No | No | |
| TipRanks | No | No | |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Education | Trading 212 | Eightcap | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | No | |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | No |
| Major Forex Pairs | Trading 212 | Eightcap | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| Review | Trading 212 Review | Eightcap Review |
| Overall | Trading 212 | Eightcap | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 82 | 87 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Trading 212 Review | Eightcap Review |