Written by ForexBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of FXCM vs Trading 212, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Comparing online brokers FXCM and Trading 212: FXCM was founded in 1999 and is publicly traded, while Trading 212 began in 2004 and is not listed on a stock exchange. Neither broker is a bank. If public listing and company age matter to you, FXCM is the older firm with shares available on a market, whereas Trading 212 operates as a private company.
On regulation, FXCM holds 4 Tier-1 licenses (considered highly trusted by ForexBrokers.com) and 2 Tier-2 licenses, earning a Trust Score of 95 out of 99—placing it in the “highly trusted” 90–99 range. Trading 212 has 3 Tier-1 licenses and no Tier-2 licenses, with a Trust Score of 82—within the “trusted” 80–89 range. In plain terms, both brokers are well-regulated, but FXCM scores higher and holds more top-tier approvals.
| Feature |
FXCM
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 1999 | 2004 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | Yes | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 4 | 3 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 2 | 0 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
When you compare commissions and fees, FXCM generally comes out cheaper than Trading 212 for forex and CFD trading. FXCM is rated 4.5/5 stars and ranks #17 of 63 for Commissions and Fees at ForexBrokers.com, while Trading 212 is rated 4/5 stars and ranks #27. Both promote competitive pricing, but FXCM’s average spreads are usually lower—especially on its commission-based account—whereas Trading 212’s averages tend to sit above the industry norm.
FXCM’s May 2024 average EUR/USD spread was about 0.78 pips for its EU, U.K., and Australia entities (1.38 pips for its St. Vincent and the Grenadines entity). Its commission-based account showed a 0.28-pip core spread in May 2024; after adding the commission (about 0.50 pips per round turn), the effective cost is roughly 0.74 pips. High-volume traders can seek extra savings via the five-tier Active Trader Rebate Program (not available in the U.K. or EU), which pays $5 to $25 per million traded if you do at least $10 million per month; requirements and discounts vary by region. As with any broker, spreads can widen at rollover or during volatile markets.
Trading 212 advertises zero-commission CFD and forex trading, but you still pay the spread. The broker now publishes average spreads; for April 2025, the average EUR/USD spread was 2.7 pips—well above the industry average and pricey versus top low-cost brokers and FXCM’s typical pricing. If you care most about spread costs, FXCM will usually be cheaper, though your final price depends on your account type, location, and market conditions.
| Feature |
FXCM
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | Starts from $50 | €1 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 0.9 | 2.7 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.8 | 2.7 |
| Non-wire bank transfer | Yes | Yes |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
Comparing FXCM vs Trading 212 for range of investments, both brokers support forex trading (available as CFDs or spot), but their product lineups differ a lot. FXCM lists about 440 tradeable symbols and 46 forex pairs, while Trading 212 offers around 13,000 instruments and 180 forex pairs. Trading 212 also lets you buy exchange-traded securities on both U.S. and international markets (for example, Apple on NASDAQ and Vodafone on the London Stock Exchange). FXCM does not offer exchange-traded shares, focusing instead on CFDs.
In crypto and extras, both brokers provide cryptocurrency CFDs; only Trading 212 lets you purchase actual crypto. FXCM supports copy trading, which Trading 212 does not. For range of investments, ForexBrokers.com rates FXCM 4.5/5 (ranked 21st of 63) and Trading 212 5/5 (ranked 15th of 63), making Trading 212 the better choice if you want the widest selection and access to real shares, while FXCM can suit traders centered on forex and CFDs who value copy trading.
| Feature |
FXCM
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 440 | 13000 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 46 | 180 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | Yes |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | No | Yes |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | Yes |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
FXCM and Trading 212 both let you practice with a free demo account and place orders right from a chart in your browser. FXCM goes further on platform choice: it has its own in-house platform, a full Windows desktop download, and supports the popular MetaTrader 4 (MT4). Trading 212 does not offer a proprietary platform, a Windows desktop app, or MT4. Neither broker supports MetaTrader 5 (MT5). For social features, FXCM offers copy trading, while Trading 212 does not.
For Trading Platforms and Tools, FXCM is rated 5 stars and ranks #4 out of 63 brokers at ForexBrokers.com, while Trading 212 is rated 4 stars and ranks #19. In short, if you want MT4, a downloadable desktop platform, or copy trading, FXCM is the better fit; if you just need a clean web platform with chart trading and a demo account, both FXCM and Trading 212 deliver.
| Feature |
FXCM
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | No |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | No |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 115 | 102 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
Comparing FXCM vs Trading 212 for mobile trading, both brokers offer iPhone and Android apps, along with price alerts to help you track stocks and forex pairs in real time. Each app supports watchlist syncing, so any changes you make on your phone or your online account appear everywhere—handy for staying organized across devices.
For charting, both apps let you draw trendlines and automatically save your annotations. FXCM includes 59 technical studies, while Trading 212 offers 104, giving more options for indicator-based analysis. In overall quality, FXCM is rated 4.5 out of 5 stars and ranks #16 out of 63 brokers for Mobile Trading Apps on ForexBrokers.com, edging out Trading 212, which holds 4 stars and ranks #17. In short, Trading 212 packs more indicators, while FXCM scores slightly higher in expert reviews.
| Feature |
FXCM
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 59 | 104 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
FXCM offers a stronger mix of market research than Trading 212. FXCM is rated 4.5 out of 5 stars and ranks #11 out of 63 brokers for Research on ForexBrokers.com, while Trading 212 scores 3.5 stars and ranks #32. If in-depth tools and daily insights matter to you, FXCM is the more feature-rich choice; Trading 212 covers the basics well but is lighter on advanced extras.
Feature by feature: FXCM provides daily market commentary (Trading 212 does not). Both brokers deliver forex news from top-tier sources. Neither offers Autochartist. FXCM includes Trading Central tools, whereas Trading 212 does not. Each broker has a sentiment tool showing long/short positioning. FXCM adds TipRanks research; Trading 212 does not. Neither integrates Acuity Trading. Both include an economic calendar for upcoming global events. In short, both platforms supply core news and calendars, but FXCM layers on more research tools for active traders who want deeper analysis.
| Feature |
FXCM
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes |
| Autochartist | No | No |
| Trading Central | Yes | No |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes |
| TipRanks | Yes | No |
| Acuity Trading | No | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
For beginner traders comparing FXCM vs Trading 212 on education, both brokers deliver plenty of learning materials. Each offers 10+ beginner video lessons and 10+ advanced videos that explain trading concepts in clear terms—useful if you’re starting out with forex or CFD topics and want to grow into more advanced strategies. FXCM adds live learning with monthly client webinars, giving newcomers a chance to ask questions and learn in real time; Trading 212 does not currently run monthly educational webinars.
Independent ratings reflect these differences: FXCM earns 4.5 out of 5 stars for Education and ranks 13th out of 63 brokers on ForexBrokers.com, while Trading 212 scores 3.5 stars and ranks 20th. If you want a strong video library plus regular webinars, FXCM is the better fit. If you primarily need on-demand videos, Trading 212 still provides solid beginner coverage.
| Feature |
FXCM
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | Yes | No |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that FXCM is better than Trading 212. FXCM finished with an overall rank of #10, while Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #25.
For traders who appreciate advanced trading tools and quality market research, FXCM is a winner, especially for algorithmic trading. Its range of tradeable markets is fairly narrow, however, and the pricing at FXCM is just average.
| Feature |
FXCM
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 95 | 82 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Trading Fees |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
Comparing online brokers FXCM vs Trading 212 for crypto trading: Trading 212 allows buying actual (delivered) cryptocurrency while FXCM does not, and both brokers offer cryptocurrency CFDs.
FXCM vs Trading 212: both support ACH/SEPA and bank wire transfers for deposits and withdrawals, but only FXCM offers PayPal and Skrill, while card support is not specified for either broker.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | FXCM | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 95 | 82 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | FXCM Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Broker Screenshots | FXCM | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
|
|
| Regulation | FXCM | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 95 | 82 | |
| Year Founded | 1999 | 2004 | |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | Yes | No | |
| Bank | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes | |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 4 | 3 | |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 2 | 0 | |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | FXCM | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (ASIC Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| Canada (CIRO Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Japan (FSA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Singapore (MAS Authorised) | No | No | |
| Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | |||
| United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | Yes | Yes | |
| USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | No | |
| New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes |
| Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | FXCM | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya (CMA Authorised) | |||
| Israel (ISA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| UAE (DFSA, FSRA, or CMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| India (SEBI Authorised) | No | No | |
| Jordan (JSC Authorised) |
| Investments | FXCM | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 440 | 13000 | |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 46 | 180 | |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | Yes | |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | No | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | Yes | |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
| Cost | FXCM | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 0.9 | 2.7 | |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.8 | 2.7 | |
| Inactivity Fee | Yes | No | |
| Order execution: Agency | Yes | Yes | |
| Order execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
| Funding | FXCM | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | Starts from $50 | €1 | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| Non-wire bank transfer | Yes | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | FXCM | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | No | |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No | |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No | |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No | |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | No | |
| cTrader | No | No |
| Trading Tools | FXCM | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
| Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 115 | 102 | |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
| Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Trading | FXCM | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Watchlist [DELETED] | |||
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 59 | 104 | |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Research - Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Research | FXCM | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No | |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes | |
| Autochartist | No | No | |
| Trading Central | Yes | No | |
| TipRanks | Yes | No | |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Education | FXCM | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | Yes | No | |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Major Forex Pairs | FXCM | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GBP/USD [DELETED] | |||
| USD/JPY [DELETED] | |||
| EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/CHF [DELETED] | |||
| USD/CAD [DELETED] | |||
| NZD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| AUD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| Review | FXCM Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Overall | FXCM | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 95 | 82 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | FXCM Review | Trading 212 Review |
IG
FOREX.com
CMC Markets
XTB
eToro
AvaTrade
Pepperstone
FP Markets
Tickmill