Pepperstone vs Trading 212 2026
In this head to head comparison of Pepperstone vs Trading 212, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
In this head to head comparison of Pepperstone vs Trading 212, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Pepperstone (founded 2010) and Trading 212 (founded 2004) are online brokers; neither is publicly traded or a bank. On ForexBrokers.com’s Trust Score scale, 90–99 = highly trusted, 80–89 = trusted, 70–79 = average risk, 60–69 = high risk, and under 59 = not trusted.
Regulation: each holds three Tier-1 licenses (considered highly trusted by ForexBrokers.com). Pepperstone also holds two Tier-2 licenses (trusted), while Trading 212 holds none. Pepperstone’s Trust Score is 94 (highly trusted); Trading 212’s is 82 (trusted).
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2010 | 2004 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 3 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 2 | 0 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 2 | 0 |
Pepperstone vs. Trading 212 on costs: Pepperstone earns 5/5 stars and ranks #6 of 63 brokers for Commissions and Fees at ForexBrokers.com, while Trading 212 scores 4/5 stars and ranks #27. The key difference is pricing style. Pepperstone’s Razor account aims for low spreads plus a separate commission, whereas Trading 212 markets zero-commission CFD trading but relies on the spread for revenue.
Pepperstone’s Razor account (available on TradingView, MT4/MT5, and cTrader) listed an average EUR/USD spread of 0.10 pips as of July 2024; adding the commission-equivalent of 0.70 pips brings the all-in cost to about 0.80 pips—around the industry average. Its commission-free Standard account averaged 1.1 pips, making it pricier than Razor. High-volume and Professional clients can lower costs further via the Active Trader program: in the U.K. and EU, rebates start around 15% per lot on spreads paid at £20m+ monthly forex volume and rise to 25% above £200m; in Australia, tiered discounts reduce spreads by about 10% to 30% from 100 lots to 3001+ lots per month (eligibility rules apply).
Trading 212 charges no commission on CFDs, but you pay the spread. For April 2025, the broker’s published average EUR/USD spread was 2.7 pips—well above the industry average and higher than Pepperstone’s Razor all-in cost. With a €10 minimum for the CFD account (the Invest account minimum is €1), Trading 212 offers simple pricing, but active forex and CFD traders focused on low trading costs will generally find Pepperstone more competitive.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $0 | €1 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 1.1 | 2.7 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.8 | 2.7 |
| Non-wire bank transfer | Yes | Yes |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | No |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
Pepperstone vs Trading 212: which has the wider range of investments? Trading 212 offers about 13,000 tradeable symbols and 180 forex pairs, while Pepperstone lists 1,726 symbols and 65 forex pairs. Both support forex trading via CFDs or spot contracts. For Range of Investments, Pepperstone holds 4 out of 5 stars and ranks 23rd of 63 brokers, whereas Trading 212 earns 5 out of 5 stars and ranks 15th.
Asset access also differs. Trading 212 lets you buy real shares on U.S. and international exchanges and even purchase actual cryptocurrency, alongside crypto CFDs. Pepperstone does not offer real shares or delivered crypto, but it does provide crypto CFDs and includes copy trading, which Trading 212 lacks. If you want the broadest symbol list and the ability to own stocks and crypto, Trading 212 stands out; if you prefer CFD-focused trading with copy trading tools, Pepperstone is the better fit.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 1726 | 13000 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 65 | 180 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | Yes |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | No | Yes |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | Yes |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
Pepperstone vs Trading 212: both brokers offer free demo (paper) accounts, web-based platforms, and the ability to place trades straight from charts. Each earns a 4-star rating for Trading Platforms and Tools from ForexBrokers.com, with Trading 212 ranked slightly higher (#19 of 63) than Pepperstone (#21 of 63).
Where they differ is platform choice and extras. Pepperstone provides its own in-house platform, a downloadable Windows desktop platform, and supports MetaTrader 4 (MT4) and MetaTrader 5 (MT5). It also offers copy trading. By contrast, Trading 212 does not offer a proprietary platform, has no Windows desktop download, and does not support MT4 or MT5 or copy trading—focusing instead on a browser-based experience. Choose Pepperstone if you want MT4/MT5, desktop access, and copy trading; pick Trading 212 if you prefer a simple, web-only setup with a comparable overall rating.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | No |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 15 | 102 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
Pepperstone and Trading 212 both offer mobile trading apps for iPhone and Android. Each app supports watchlist syncing with your online account, so changes carry over between devices. You can set stock and forex price alerts on both, draw trendlines on charts, and your drawings auto-save for the next session.
For charting tools, Pepperstone includes 30 technical studies, while Trading 212 offers 104, giving more indicator choices. Both apps are rated 4 out of 5 stars. In ForexBrokers.com’s Mobile Trading Apps category, Trading 212 ranks #17 out of 63 brokers, while Pepperstone ranks #19, making Trading 212 a slight favorite for mobile charting depth, with Pepperstone still delivering a strong, well-rated experience.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 30 | 104 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
Comparing Pepperstone vs Trading 212 for market research, Pepperstone offers daily market commentary while Trading 212 does not. Both brokers deliver forex news from top-tier sources like Bloomberg, Reuters, or Dow Jones, provide a sentiment tool that shows long/short positioning, and include an economic calendar. Pepperstone also adds Autochartist tools for technical and fundamental analysis, which Trading 212 lacks. Neither broker offers research from Trading Central, TipRanks, or Acuity Trading.
These differences are reflected in independent ratings: Pepperstone earns 4.5/5 stars and ranks #12 out of 63 brokers for Research at ForexBrokers.com, while Trading 212 scores 3.5/5 stars and ranks #32. If you want extra in-platform analysis and day-to-day commentary, Pepperstone is the stronger choice; if you only need core news, sentiment data, and a calendar, Trading 212 covers the basics.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes |
| Autochartist | Yes | No |
| Trading Central | No | No |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes |
| TipRanks | No | No |
| Acuity Trading | No | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
Pepperstone and Trading 212 both give beginners plenty to watch, with at least 10 beginner videos and at least 10 advanced videos to help you grow from the basics to more skilled trading. A key difference is live learning: Pepperstone hosts educational client webinars at least once a month, while Trading 212 does not offer webinars. If you value live sessions where you can learn in real time, Pepperstone has the edge.
On overall education quality, Pepperstone is rated 4.5 out of 5 stars and ranks #15 out of 63 brokers for Education on ForexBrokers.com. Trading 212 is rated 3.5 out of 5 stars and ranks #20. In short, both platforms support self-paced learning with beginner and advanced videos, but Pepperstone’s higher rating and monthly webinars make it the stronger pick for most new traders seeking guided learning.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | Yes | No |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that Pepperstone is better than Trading 212. Pepperstone finished with an overall rank of #17, while Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #25.
Pepperstone offers a growing range of tradeable markets, good-quality research, and support for multiple social copy trading platforms.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 94 | 82 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Trading Fees |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
Pepperstone vs Trading 212: Pepperstone does not offer buying actual (delivered) cryptocurrency but does support cryptocurrency CFDs, while Trading 212 provides both real crypto purchases and crypto CFD trading.
Pepperstone vs Trading 212: both brokers support ACH/SEPA transfers and bank wire deposits/withdrawals, Pepperstone additionally accepts PayPal (Trading 212 does not), neither supports Skrill, and Visa/Mastercard availability is not specified.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | Pepperstone | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 94 | 82 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Pepperstone Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Broker Screenshots | Pepperstone | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
| Regulation | Pepperstone | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 94 | 82 | |
| Year Founded | 2010 | 2004 | |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No | |
| Bank | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes | |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 3 | |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 2 | 0 | |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 2 | 0 |
| Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | Pepperstone | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (ASIC Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| Canada (CIRO Authorised) | No | No | |
| Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Japan (FSA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Singapore (MAS Authorised) | No | No | |
| Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | |||
| United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | Yes | Yes | |
| USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | No | |
| New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes |
| Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | Pepperstone | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya (CMA Authorised) | Yes | ||
| Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | No | |
| South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | No | No | |
| UAE (DFSA, FSRA, or CMA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| India (SEBI Authorised) | No | No | |
| Jordan (JSC Authorised) |
| Investments | Pepperstone | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 1726 | 13000 | |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 65 | 180 | |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | Yes | |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | No | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | Yes | |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
| Cost | Pepperstone | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 1.1 | 2.7 | |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.8 | 2.7 | |
| Inactivity Fee | No | No | |
| Order execution: Agency | Yes | Yes | |
| Order execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
| Funding | Pepperstone | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $0 | €1 | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | No | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| Non-wire bank transfer | Yes | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | Pepperstone | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | No | |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No | |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No | |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No | |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No | |
| cTrader | Yes | No |
| Trading Tools | Pepperstone | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
| Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 15 | 102 | |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
| Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Trading | Pepperstone | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Watchlist [DELETED] | |||
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 30 | 104 | |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Research - Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Research | Pepperstone | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No | |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes | |
| Autochartist | Yes | No | |
| Trading Central | No | No | |
| TipRanks | No | No | |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Education | Pepperstone | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | Yes | No | |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Major Forex Pairs | Pepperstone | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GBP/USD [DELETED] | |||
| USD/JPY [DELETED] | |||
| EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/CHF [DELETED] | |||
| USD/CAD [DELETED] | |||
| NZD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| AUD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| Review | Pepperstone Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Overall | Pepperstone | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 94 | 82 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Pepperstone Review | Trading 212 Review |