IFC Markets vs Octa 2025
In this head to head comparison of IFC Markets vs Octa, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
In this head to head comparison of IFC Markets vs Octa, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
IFC Markets, established in 2006, and Octa, founded in 2011, offer online trading services but come with varying levels of trust and regulation as per ForexBrokers.com ratings. IFC Markets has a Trust Score of 73, positioning it at an average risk level. It holds one Tier-2 license, indicating a trusted regulatory stance. In contrast, Octa holds a similar Tier-2 license and boasts a Trust Score of 72, also categorizing it within the average risk bracket. However, Octa does hold a Tier-1 license, marking it with a slightly higher regulatory endorsement in terms of trust.
Neither IFC Markets nor Octa is publicly traded or operates as a bank, which may influence their market perception compared to more publicly accountable or bank-affiliated institutions. Potential traders should weigh these aspects when choosing a broker to ensure their trading aligns with personal risk preferences and regulatory comfort levels.
Feature |
|
|
---|---|---|
Year Founded | 2006 | 2011 |
Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
Bank | No | No |
Tier-1 Licenses | 0 | 1 |
Tier-2 Licenses | 1 | 1 |
Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
Tier-4 Licenses | 1 | 1 |
IFC Markets’ commissions and fees lean higher on its standard account, with an average EUR/USD spread of 1.44 pips versus the industry average of 1.08. Value improves for active traders on its new ECN account, where the effective EUR/USD spread is about 1.1 pips after a 0.005% commission is applied on both sides of the trade. Sweeteners include no inactivity fees and discounts for high-volume traders. Commissions and fees rating: 4/5 stars; ranked #40 out of 63.
Octa has tightened its pricing and now competes more closely with low-cost MetaTrader brokers. Average EUR/USD spreads are listed at 0.5 pips under its EU entity and 0.9 pips under its foreign entities, though Octa doesn’t provide a date range for these figures. It also advertises no slippage on 97.5% of orders and no overnight carry costs, while some rules may limit high-frequency strategies. Commissions and fees rating: 4/5 stars; ranked #30 out of 63.
Head to head, Octa’s advertised EUR/USD spreads look lower than IFC Markets’ standard pricing and even undercut IFC’s ECN effective spread, but the lack of time-stamped spread data at Octa makes exact comparisons tricky. Choose IFC Markets if you value no inactivity fees and active-trader discounts; consider Octa if you prioritize low listed spreads and no overnight carry costs, and confirm which entity and account type you’ll use before you decide.
Feature |
|
|
---|---|---|
Minimum Deposit | $1 | $25 |
Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 1.44 | 0.9 |
All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 1.1 | N/A |
Non-wire bank transfer | No | No |
PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | No |
Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | Yes |
Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
IFC Markets vs Octa: both brokers support forex trading as CFDs or spot, offer copy trading, and let you trade cryptocurrency via CFDs (not the actual coins). Neither broker allows direct purchases of U.S.-listed shares, but both give access to exchange-traded securities on international markets.
IFC Markets provides a wider selection with 630 tradeable symbols and 49 forex pairs, compared with Octa’s 300 symbols and 35 pairs. Both earn 3.5 out of 5 stars for Range of Investments, according to ForexBrokers.com. In the same category, IFC Markets ranks 44th out of 63 brokers, while Octa ranks 53rd. If you want more instruments to choose from, IFC Markets has the larger catalog; Octa offers a similar mix of categories in a smaller lineup.
Feature |
|
|
---|---|---|
Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 630 | 300 |
Forex Pairs (Total) | 49 | 35 |
U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | No |
Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | Yes |
Copy Trading | Yes | Yes |
Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | No |
Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
IFC Markets and Octa line up closely on trading platforms and tools. Both offer free paper (demo) accounts, a proprietary in-house platform, and the popular MetaTrader 4 (MT4) and MetaTrader 5 (MT5). You can trade via a Windows desktop download or a web-based platform, use copy trading, and place orders directly from charts. The exact number of built-in technical indicators and the number of watch-list columns were not specified for either broker.
In independent testing, both earned 4 stars for Trading Platforms and Tools. IFC Markets ranks slightly higher at #37 out of 63 brokers, while Octa sits at #38. Given their similar coverage, try each broker’s free demo to see which platform layout and workflow you prefer.
Feature |
|
|
---|---|---|
Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | Yes |
Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | Yes |
Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
Copy Trading | Yes | Yes |
MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | Yes |
MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | Yes |
Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 30 | 30 |
Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
IFC Markets and Octa both deliver capable mobile trading apps for iPhone and Android. Each app supports price alerts, 30 built-in technical indicators for charting, and drawing tools like trendlines, with drawings saved automatically. Whether you trade forex or follow markets on the go, the core tools and chart features are comparable.
The standout difference is watchlist syncing: IFC Markets syncs watchlists between the mobile app and your online account, while Octa does not. Both brokers earned 4 stars for Mobile Trading Apps, though Octa holds the higher category ranking from ForexBrokers.com (#37 out of 63) compared with IFC Markets (#53). Choose IFC Markets if cross-device watchlist syncing matters to you; pick Octa if the higher third-party ranking is a deciding factor.
Feature |
|
|
---|---|---|
Android App | Yes | Yes |
Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes |
Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | No |
Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 30 | 30 |
Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
When comparing market research at IFC Markets and Octa, both brokers publish daily market commentary and include an economic calendar. Octa has an edge for news and charting extras: it streams forex headlines from top-tier sources and offers Autochartist tools for pattern spotting. IFC Markets counterbalances with a sentiment tool that shows the ratio of long vs. short positions across instruments. Neither broker provides Trading Central, TipRanks, or Acuity Trading research.
On performance, Octa earns 4 out of 5 stars for Research and ranks #27 of 63 brokers on ForexBrokers.com, while IFC Markets scores 3.5 stars and ranks #41. Traders who value live news and automated chart setups may prefer Octa, whereas those who like monitoring crowd positioning may find IFC Markets appealing.
Feature |
|
|
---|---|---|
Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | Yes |
Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | No | Yes |
Autochartist | No | Yes |
Trading Central | No | No |
Client sentiment data | Yes | No |
TipRanks | No | No |
Acuity Trading | No | No |
Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
IFC Markets and Octa both provide plenty of forex and CFD education, with well over the minimum of 10 learning pieces. Each broker offers at least 10 beginner videos and at least 10 advanced videos, so newcomers can start with basics and grow into more complex topics. A key difference is live training: Octa hosts educational client webinars at least once a month, while IFC Markets does not, which may matter if you prefer learning in real time.
In expert reviews, Octa earns a slightly higher Education rating (4.0 stars) than IFC Markets (3.5 stars). However, IFC Markets holds a higher spot in ForexBrokers.com’s Education ranking (#30 of 63) compared with Octa (#42 of 63). If you want monthly webinars and a steady stream of live lessons, Octa may fit better; if you care more about a higher-ranked education lineup, IFC Markets is worth a look.
Feature |
|
|
---|---|---|
Webinars | No | Yes |
Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that IFC Markets is better than Octa. IFC Markets finished with an overall rank of #45, while Octa finished with an overall rank of #47.
IFC Markets is a well-established broker that has been in operation for 17 years. Forex traders at IFC Markets gain access to multiple trading platforms, a growing range of tradeable markets, and a balanced offering of research and educational content. However, IFC Markets’ Trust Score suffers due to the broker’s limited range of regulatory licenses.
Feature |
|
|
---|---|---|
Overall Rating |
|
|
Trust Score | 73 | 72 |
Range of Investments |
|
|
Commissions & Fees |
|
|
Platforms & Tools |
|
|
Research |
|
|
Mobile Trading |
|
|
Education |
|
|
In an IFC Markets vs Octa comparison for crypto trading, neither broker offers buying actual (delivered) cryptocurrencies, but both provide cryptocurrency CFD trading.
In the IFC Markets vs Octa comparison, neither broker supports ACH/SEPA or PayPal, both offer bank wire transfers, only Octa supports Skrill, and Visa/Mastercard availability is not specified for either.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5Overall Rating | IFC Markets | Octa | |
---|---|---|---|
Overall Rating |
|
| |
Commissions & Fees |
|
| |
Range of Investments |
|
| |
Platforms & Tools |
|
| |
Mobile Trading |
|
| |
Research |
|
| |
Education |
|
| |
Trust Score | 73 | 72 | |
Winner | check_circle | ||
Review | Octa Review |
Broker Screenshots | IFC Markets | Octa | |
---|---|---|---|
Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
Regulation | IFC Markets | Octa | |
---|---|---|---|
Trust Score | 73 | 72 | |
Year Founded | 2006 | 2011 | |
Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No | |
Bank | No | No | |
Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | ||
Tier-1 Licenses | 0 | 1 | |
Tier-2 Licenses | 1 | 1 | |
Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
Tier-4 Licenses | 1 | 1 |
Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | IFC Markets | Octa | |
---|---|---|---|
Australia (ASIC Authorised) | No | ||
Canada (CIRO Authorised) | No | ||
Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | ||
Japan (SFC Authorised) | No | ||
Singapore (MAS Authorised) | No | ||
Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | |||
United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | No | ||
USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | ||
New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | ||
Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes |
Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | IFC Markets | Octa | |
---|---|---|---|
Kenya (CMA Authorised) | |||
Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | ||
South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | Yes | Yes | |
UAE (DFSA, FSRA, or SCA Authorised) | No | ||
India (SEBI Authorised) | No | ||
Jordan (JSC Authorised) |
Investments | IFC Markets | Octa | |
---|---|---|---|
Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 630 | 300 | |
Forex Pairs (Total) | 49 | 35 | |
U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | No | |
Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | Yes | |
Copy Trading | Yes | Yes | |
Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | No | |
Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Cost | IFC Markets | Octa | |
---|---|---|---|
Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 1.44 | 0.9 | |
All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 1.1 | N/A | |
Inactivity Fee | No | No | |
Order execution: Agency | Yes | Yes | |
Order execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
Funding | IFC Markets | Octa | |
---|---|---|---|
Minimum Deposit | $1 | $25 | |
PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | No | |
Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | Yes | |
Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
Non-wire bank transfer | No | No |
Trading Platforms | IFC Markets | Octa | |
---|---|---|---|
Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | Yes | |
Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | Yes | |
Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
Copy Trading | Yes | Yes | |
MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | Yes | |
MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | Yes | |
cTrader | No | No |
Trading Tools | IFC Markets | Octa | |
---|---|---|---|
Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 30 | 30 | |
Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
Mobile Trading | IFC Markets | Octa | |
---|---|---|---|
Android App | Yes | Yes | |
Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
Mobile Watchlist [DELETED] | |||
Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | No | |
Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 30 | 30 | |
Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes | |
Mobile Research - Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Research | IFC Markets | Octa | |
---|---|---|---|
Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | Yes | |
Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | No | Yes | |
Autochartist | No | Yes | |
Trading Central | No | No | |
TipRanks | No | No | |
Client sentiment data | Yes | No | |
Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Education | IFC Markets | Octa | |
---|---|---|---|
Webinars | No | Yes | |
Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Major Forex Pairs | IFC Markets | Octa | |
---|---|---|---|
GBP/USD [DELETED] | |||
USD/JPY [DELETED] | |||
EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
USD/CHF [DELETED] | |||
USD/CAD [DELETED] | |||
NZD/USD [DELETED] | |||
AUD/USD [DELETED] | |||
Review | Octa Review |
Overall | IFC Markets | Octa | |
---|---|---|---|
Overall Rating |
|
| |
Commissions & Fees |
|
| |
Range of Investments |
|
| |
Platforms & Tools |
|
| |
Mobile Trading |
|
| |
Research |
|
| |
Education |
|
| |
Trust Score | 73 | 72 | |
Winner | check_circle | ||
Review | Octa Review |