Capital.com vs Octa 2025
In this head to head comparison of Capital.com vs Octa, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
In this head to head comparison of Capital.com vs Octa, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Capital.com and Octa are both online brokers that offer trading services, but they differ in their regulatory standing and trustworthiness. Founded in 2016, Capital.com has acquired a higher level of regulatory approval with three Tier-1 licenses, indicating a highly trusted status, and one Tier-2 license. On the other hand, Octa, founded in 2011, holds one Tier-1 license and one Tier-2 license, placing it a step below Capital.com in terms of regulatory endorsement.
According to ForexBrokers.com, Capital.com scores an 87 out of 99 in trust, making it a trusted broker. In comparison, Octa has a lower Trust Score of 72, which puts it in the average risk category. Neither Capital.com nor Octa is publicly traded or operates as a bank, but Capital.com's higher trust rating and more significant regulatory backing make it a less risky choice for online traders.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2016 | 2011 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 1 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 1 | 1 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 2 | 1 |
Capital.com vs Octa on commissions and fees: Capital.com earns 5/5 stars and ranks #3 of 63 at ForexBrokers.com, while Octa scores 4/5 stars and ranks #26. Both aim for low pricing, but Capital.com holds a clearer edge thanks to verified spread data and consistently strong value.
Capital.com’s pricing is slightly better than the industry average. Its EUR/USD spread averaged 0.6712 pips in April 2024 (the broker lists 0.67 pips as a dynamic spread), which is notably low and attractive for cost-conscious forex traders. You can choose a universal retail account or apply for a professional account if eligible; keep in mind that professional clients do not receive the same regulatory protection as retail traders.
Octa has improved its pricing and is catching up to the lowest-cost MetaTrader brokers. It reports no slippage on 97.5% of orders and no overnight carry (swap) costs, though certain restrictions can limit high-frequency trading. Fees depend on your account type and the Octa entity you use: EU clients get a single MT5 account, while international clients (served from South Africa or Octa’s Mwali entity) can choose MT4, MT5, or OctaTrader. Spreads also vary by entity—Octa lists 0.5 pips on EUR/USD for the EU entity versus 0.9 pips for foreign entities—but it does not provide a date range for these figures, making exact comparisons less certain.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $20 | $25 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 0.64 | 0.9 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.67 | N/A |
| Non-wire bank transfer | No | No |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
Capital.com vs Octa: which broker offers a wider range of investments? Capital.com lists about 5,585 tradable symbols and 125 forex pairs, far more than Octa’s roughly 300 symbols and 35 pairs. Both let you trade forex via CFDs and offer cryptocurrency CFDs, but neither lets you buy actual crypto. Neither broker provides access to U.S.-listed shares as real, exchange-traded stocks. A key difference: Octa offers some real international shares and supports copy trading, while Capital.com does not.
On ForexBrokers.com, Capital.com earns 4.5 out of 5 stars for Range of Investments and ranks 18th out of 63 brokers, reflecting its larger market selection. Octa scores 3.5 stars and ranks 33rd, but may appeal if you want copy trading and the ability to buy certain international shares. Choose Capital.com for breadth across markets and forex pairs; choose Octa if copy trading and access to non-U.S. real shares matter more.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 5585 | 300 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 125 | 35 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | No |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | No | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | No |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
Capital.com and Octa both check the core boxes for platform access and ease of use: each offers a free virtual demo account, an in-house proprietary platform, a Windows desktop download, a web-based (browser) platform, and the ability to place trades directly from charts. Both brokers support MetaTrader 4 (MT4). Key differences: Octa also supports MetaTrader 5 (MT5) and offers copy trading, while Capital.com does not offer copy trading and does not support MT5.
For Trading Platforms and Tools, Capital.com is rated 4.5 stars and ranks #10 out of 63 brokers by ForexBrokers.com, while Octa is rated 4 stars and ranks #30. If you want MT5 or copy trading, Octa is the better fit. If platform quality and rankings matter most, Capital.com comes out ahead.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | Yes |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | Yes |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | Yes |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 97 | 30 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
Capital.com and Octa both check the key boxes for mobile trading. Each broker offers an iPhone app and an Android app, supports stock and forex price alerts, and includes charting with 30 technical studies. You can draw trendlines in both apps, and your drawings auto save. One limitation is the same for both: watchlist symbols don’t sync between the mobile app and your online account.
Where they differ is in quality scores and industry rankings. Capital.com earns 4.5 out of 5 stars for its mobile trading app and is ranked #11 out of 63 brokers by ForexBrokers.com, while Octa scores 4 stars and ranks #29. If you want a higher-rated mobile trading experience with strong charting and alerts, Capital.com has the edge. If basic mobile trading features meet your needs, Octa still covers the essentials.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | No | No |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 30 | 30 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
Capital.com and Octa both cover the basics well for market research: each delivers daily market commentary, top-tier forex news (from sources like Bloomberg, Reuters, and Dow Jones), and an economic calendar. The differences show up in the extra tools. Octa integrates Autochartist for pattern and signal ideas, while Capital.com does not. Neither broker uses Trading Central or Acuity Trading. Capital.com stands out with a sentiment tool that shows long/short positioning across instruments and includes TipRanks research; Octa lacks both of those.
For ratings, Capital.com scores 4.5 out of 5 stars and ranks #14 of 63 brokers for Research on ForexBrokers.com, while Octa earns 4 stars and ranks #24. In short: choose Capital.com if you value sentiment insights and TipRanks-powered ideas, or pick Octa if Autochartist’s technical scanning fits your trading style.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | Yes |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes |
| Autochartist | No | Yes |
| Trading Central | No | No |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | No |
| TipRanks | Yes | No |
| Acuity Trading | No | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
Capital.com and Octa both offer sizable education hubs for forex and CFD learners, including at least 10 beginner videos and at least 10 advanced videos. One key difference is live teaching: Octa runs monthly educational webinars, while Capital.com does not. For overall education quality, Capital.com scores 4.5 out of 5 stars and ranks #8 of 63 brokers at ForexBrokers.com, compared with Octa’s 4 out of 5 stars and a #32 ranking.
If you want live, scheduled lessons to stay on track, Octa’s regular webinars can help. If you prefer on‑demand videos and a higher‑rated learning experience, Capital.com has the edge. Either way, beginners can find clear guidance on forex and CFD basics, with room to grow into more advanced topics.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | Yes |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that Capital.com is better than Octa. Capital.com finished with an overall rank of #12, while Octa finished with an overall rank of #34.
Capital.com stands out for its quality research, strong educational content, and innovative web platform. Capital.com holds fewer regulatory licenses and offers a narrower range of markets than some of the best brokers, but still significantly outperforms the industry average.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 87 | 72 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Trading Fees |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
Capital.com vs Octa: neither online broker allows buying actual (delivered) cryptocurrency, but both offer trading in cryptocurrency CFDs.
Online brokers Capital.com and Octa both lack ACH/SEPA support, both offer Skrill and bank wire deposits/withdrawals, Capital.com supports PayPal while Octa does not, and Visa/Mastercard availability is not specified for either.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | Capital.com | Octa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 87 | 72 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Capital.com Review | Octa Review |
| Broker Screenshots | Capital.com | Octa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |