Written by ForexBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of Capital.com vs FP Markets, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Capital.com and FP Markets, both prominent online brokers, offer different levels of security and reliability for traders. Founded in 2016, Capital.com has quickly established itself in the industry, holding three Tier-1 licenses and one Tier-2 license, an indication of high trustworthiness. Although Capital.com is not publicly traded or a bank, it boasts a Trust Score of 87 according to ForexBrokers.com, placing it in the trusted category.
In contrast, FP Markets was founded earlier in 2005 and holds two Tier-1 licenses alongside one Tier-2 license, offering a similar level of regulatory trust. Like Capital.com, FP Markets is neither publicly traded nor a bank. Its Trust Score is slightly higher at 89, which also signifies a trusted standing. Both brokers remain competitive options for online trading, each with a significant number of licenses that enhance their credibility among users.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
FP Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2016 | 2005 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 2 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 1 | 1 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 2 | 2 |
Capital.com and FP Markets are both top-rated for commissions and fees, each earning 5 out of 5 stars. In ForexBrokers.com’s 2024 rankings, Capital.com places #3 of 63, while FP Markets ranks #11 of 63. Both appeal to cost-conscious traders, but they take different paths: Capital.com leans on tight spreads for simple, low-cost forex trading, whereas FP Markets shines for traders who prefer ECN-style pricing with a small per-trade commission.
Capital.com’s pricing is slightly better than the industry average. Its EUR/USD spread averaged 0.6712 pips in April 2024, making it a strong pick for low-cost forex trading. There’s a universal account for retail traders and a separate professional account for those who qualify (note: professional status comes with reduced regulatory protections).
FP Markets offers two main choices on MetaTrader and cTrader. The Raw ECN account averaged 0.1 pips on EUR/USD (about 0.8 pips all-in after a $6 round-turn commission per standard lot as of October 2023), while the Standard account averaged 1.1 pips with no separate commission. For share CFDs, FP Markets’ Iress platform delivers Direct Market Access with full depth of book, but the ViewPoint account is best for active, higher-balance traders due to platform/data fees and higher minimums; the lower-cost Iress Investor option waives monthly fees but limits features.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
FP Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $20 | $100 AUD |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 0.64 | 1.3 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.67 | 0.9 |
| Non-wire bank transfer | No | No |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
Capital.com and FP Markets both support forex trading (CFD or spot contracts) and each offers a wide range of markets. FP Markets lists around 10,000 tradeable symbols, nearly double Capital.com’s 5,585. That said, Capital.com offers more currency pairs (125 vs 71). Neither broker provides access to exchange-traded stocks on U.S. or international exchanges, and neither lets you buy actual crypto; both do offer cryptocurrency CFDs.
For extra tools, FP Markets includes copy trading, while Capital.com does not. In independent reviews, both earn 4.5 out of 5 stars for Range of Investments, with FP Markets ranked #16 and Capital.com #18 out of 63 brokers. In short, pick FP Markets if you want the most symbols and copy trading; choose Capital.com if having more forex pairs is your priority.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
FP Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 5585 | 10000 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 125 | 71 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | No |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | No | No |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | No |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
Comparing Capital.com vs FP Markets for trading platforms and tools, both brokers make it easy to get started with practice via free demo (paper) accounts. Each offers an in-house proprietary platform alongside MetaTrader 4 (MT4), plus a Windows desktop download and a web-based platform you can use in your browser. Both also support trading directly from charts, which can help speed up order placement.
Key differences come down to extras and ratings. FP Markets supports copy trading and offers MetaTrader 5 (MT5), while Capital.com does not. According to ForexBrokers.com, Capital.com earns 4.5 out of 5 stars and ranks #10 out of 63 for Trading Platforms and Tools, whereas FP Markets scores 4 out of 5 stars and ranks #22. In short, pick Capital.com if you want a higher-rated platform experience, or choose FP Markets if MT5 and copy trading matter most to you.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
FP Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | Yes |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | Yes |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | Yes |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 97 | 30 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
Capital.com and FP Markets both offer mobile trading apps for iPhone and Android, and each supports price alerts. Watchlists do not sync between mobile and the web platform on either broker, which is worth noting if you switch devices often. For charting, both apps let you draw trendlines and will auto-save your drawings. Capital.com includes 30 built-in technical studies, while FP Markets relies on the standard set of indicators available in MetaTrader by default.
Based on ForexBrokers.com’s Mobile Trading Apps category, Capital.com is rated 4.5 out of 5 stars and ranks #11 out of 63 brokers, while FP Markets scores 4 out of 5 stars and ranks #20. If you want more built-in studies and a higher-rated mobile experience, Capital.com has the edge. If you prefer the familiar MetaTrader environment and tools, FP Markets may suit your style.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
FP Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | No | No |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 30 | MetaTrader (Default) |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
Comparing Capital.com and FP Markets for market research, both brokers check key boxes: daily market commentary, forex news from top-tier sources like Bloomberg, Reuters, or Dow Jones, an economic calendar for upcoming events, and a sentiment tool that shows the ratio of long and short positions. These essentials make it easier to follow the market and spot trading opportunities.
The differences show up in extra research tools. FP Markets offers Autochartist and Trading Central, adding automated pattern scanning and well-known analyst insights. Capital.com doesn’t offer those, but it does include TipRanks for stock-related research and analyst ratings. Overall, Capital.com earns a higher Research score (4.5/5) and ranks #14 out of 63 brokers at ForexBrokers.com, while FP Markets scores 4/5 and ranks #22. Pick FP Markets if you want Autochartist and Trading Central; choose Capital.com if TipRanks and a slightly higher research rating matter more to you.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
FP Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | Yes |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes |
| Autochartist | No | Yes |
| Trading Central | No | Yes |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes |
| TipRanks | Yes | No |
| Acuity Trading | No | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
Both Capital.com and FP Markets deliver plenty of forex and CFD education, easily meeting the bar of 10+ dedicated learning pieces. Each broker also offers a deep video library for all skill levels, with 10 or more beginner videos and 10 or more advanced videos. In expert reviews, Capital.com scores higher for education overall, earning 4.5 out of 5 stars and ranking #8 out of 63 brokers on ForexBrokers.com, while FP Markets earns 4 stars and ranks #22.
There is one clear difference: FP Markets hosts ongoing educational webinars at least once a month, while Capital.com does not. If you want live sessions and Q&A, FP Markets is a good fit. If you prefer a highly rated, on-demand learning path with lots of beginner and advanced videos, Capital.com has the edge for most new traders.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
FP Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | Yes |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that Capital.com is better than FP Markets. Capital.com finished with an overall rank of #12, while FP Markets finished with an overall rank of #19.
Capital.com stands out for its quality research, strong educational content, and innovative web platform. Capital.com holds fewer regulatory licenses and offers a narrower range of markets than some of the best brokers, but still significantly outperforms the industry average.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
FP Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 87 | 89 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Trading Fees |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
In the Capital.com vs FP Markets comparison, neither broker lets you buy actual (delivered) cryptocurrencies, but both support trading cryptocurrency CFDs.
Capital.com vs FP Markets: both brokers support PayPal, Skrill, and bank wire deposits/withdrawals, neither offers ACH or SEPA transfers, and Visa/Mastercard availability is not specified.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | Capital.com | FP Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 87 | 89 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Capital.com Review | FP Markets Review |
| Broker Screenshots | Capital.com | FP Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
IG
CMC Markets
FOREX.com
XTB
eToro
AvaTrade
Pepperstone
FP Markets
Tickmill