FP Markets vs Trading 212 2025
In this head to head comparison of FP Markets vs Trading 212, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
In this head to head comparison of FP Markets vs Trading 212, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
FP Markets, established in 2005, and Trading 212, founded in 2004, are both well-regarded online brokers. Neither company is publicly traded or operates as a bank. When it comes to regulatory standing, their Trust Scores reflect a solid level of dependability. FP Markets holds a Trust Score of 89 out of 99, placing it firmly in the 'trusted' category according to ForexBrokers.com. This broker is fortified by two Tier-1 licenses and one Tier-2 license, solidifying a strong framework of customer protection and industry compliance.
Trading 212, with a Trust Score of 80 out of 99, also falls into the 'trusted' tier, although at the lower end of this range. It distinguishes itself by holding three Tier-1 licenses, which are crucial markers of a broker's trustworthiness. However, unlike FP Markets, it lacks any Tier-2 licenses. Both brokers provide a reliable platform for online trading, each demonstrating their commitment to maintaining client trust and regulatory compliance.
Feature |
|
|
---|---|---|
Year Founded | 2005 | 2004 |
Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
Bank | No | No |
Tier-1 Licenses | 2 | 3 |
Tier-2 Licenses | 1 | 0 |
Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
Tier-4 Licenses | 2 | 0 |
Comparing commissions and fees, FP Markets is the stronger value play for active forex and CFD traders, especially on its commission-based ECN setups. It holds a 5-star rating for Commissions and Fees and ranks #6 out of 63 brokers. Trading 212, while easy to start with and marketed as zero-commission, mostly charges via the spread on CFDs and forex; it carries a 4-star rating and ranks #50 out of 63.
FP Markets’ Raw ECN account averages 0.1 pips on EUR/USD (about 0.8 pips all-in after the $6 per round-turn, per standard lot commission), while its Standard account averages 1.1 pips. You can access these prices on MetaTrader or cTrader (spread-only Standard or commission-based Raw). FP Markets also earned Best in Class honors for Commissions and Fees in 2024. For share CFDs in Australia, the Iress ViewPoint suite provides DMA with full depth of book, but monthly platform/data fees may apply unless you’re on the Premier tier or generate at least AUD 150 in monthly commissions. The lower-cost Iress Investor option waives monthly fees but offers click-to-refresh quotes and basic charting.
Trading 212 offers Invest (shares) and CFD accounts, with very low minimums (EUR 1 for Invest, EUR 10 for CFD). For CFDs and forex, the broker’s “zero commission” model relies on the spread: its published average spread for EUR/USD was 2.7 pips in April 2025—well above the industry average—making it pricier for frequent traders than top competitors. Bottom line: FP Markets’ ECN pricing can deliver lower trading costs for active forex and CFD users, while Trading 212 may appeal to casual traders who prefer simple, low-entry pricing but can accept wider spreads.
Feature |
|
|
---|---|---|
Minimum Deposit | $100 AUD | €1 |
Average Spread EUR/USD - Standard | 1.2 | 2.7 |
All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.7 | 2.7 |
Active Trader or VIP Discounts | Yes | No |
ACH or SEPA Transfers | No | Yes |
PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
Visa/Mastercard (Credit/Debit) | Yes | Yes |
Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
FP Markets vs Trading 212 for range of investments: FP Markets lists 10,000 tradeable symbols, while Trading 212 offers 7,868. For forex, both support CFD/spot trading; FP Markets covers 71 currency pairs, and Trading 212 expands to 146. If you want to own shares directly, Trading 212 lets you buy exchange-traded stocks on both U.S. and international markets, whereas FP Markets does not offer exchange-traded securities (stock exposure there is via CFDs). Neither broker lets you buy actual cryptocurrency, but both provide crypto derivatives.
Extras and ratings: FP Markets offers copy trading, while Trading 212 does not. For Range of Investments, ForexBrokers.com rates FP Markets 4.5/5 stars (ranked 19 of 63) and Trading 212 5/5 stars (ranked 16 of 63). Choose FP Markets if you want a very large overall symbol count and copy trading; pick Trading 212 if you want more forex pairs plus access to real U.S. and international shares.
Feature |
|
|
---|---|---|
Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 10000 | 7868 |
Forex Pairs (Total) | 71 | 146 |
U.S. Stock Trading (Non CFD) | No | Yes |
Int'l Stock Trading (Non CFD) | No | Yes |
Social Trading / Copy Trading | Yes | No |
Cryptocurrency (Physical) | No | No |
Cryptocurrency (Derivative) | Yes | Yes |
Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
FP Markets and Trading 212 both offer traders the chance to practice trading without financial risk through free virtual demo accounts. Additionally, each broker provides a proprietary trading platform developed in-house. For desktop users, FP Markets offers a downloadable Windows platform, while Trading 212 caters to web-oriented traders with its sleek web-based platform. Both brokers make browser-based trading accessible, though FP Markets stands out by supporting popular third-party platforms MetaTrader 4 (MT4) and MetaTrader 5 (MT5), which could appeal to traders interested in a wider range of tools and customization options. Traders using copy trading services might lean towards FP Markets as it supports this feature, unlike Trading 212.
When it comes to charting and analytics, Trading 212 offers an extended array with 20 drawing tools, slightly surpassing FP Markets' 17. Both platforms allow trading directly from a stock chart, providing a seamless experience for users who enjoy quick access points. FP Markets supports more fields in their watch lists, offering 7 columns compared to Trading 212’s 5. While both brokers earned a respectable 4-star rating for their trading platforms and tools, Trading 212 ranks a bit higher in a comparison of 63 brokers by ForexBrokers.com, securing the 20th position, whereas FP Markets is ranked 23rd. These features make both platforms strong choices, with the decision ultimately resting on a trader's specific needs and preferences.
Feature |
|
|
---|---|---|
Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
Proprietary Platform | Yes | Yes |
Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No |
Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
Social Trading / Copy Trading | Yes | No |
MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No |
MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No |
DupliTrade | No | No |
ZuluTrade | No | No |
Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 30 | 54 |
Charting - Drawing Tools (Total) | 17 | 20 |
Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Watchlists - Total Fields | 7 | 5 |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
FP Markets and Trading 212 both offer solid mobile trading apps for iPhone and Android users. They provide essential features like stock and forex price alerts, trendline drawing on charts, the ability to view multiple time frames, and watchlists with real-time quotes. However, the FP Markets app lacks watchlist symbol syncing, which is available with Trading 212, allowing for a seamless transition between devices and ensuring any updates are immediately reflected across platforms.
When it comes to charting, FP Markets utilizes the MetaTrader default technical studies, while Trading 212 impressively offers 104 options. Both apps automatically save drawings on charts, providing ease for users who frequently analyze chart patterns. Despite these differences, both platforms boast a commendable mobile app rating of 4 out of 5 stars; however, Trading 212 slightly edges out FP Markets in rankings by ForexBrokers.com, coming in at 17th place compared to FP Markets' 18th out of 63 brokers. This makes both apps excellent choices for traders seeking a comprehensive mobile trading experience.
Feature |
|
|
---|---|---|
Android App | Yes | Yes |
Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
Mobile Alerts - Basic Fields | Yes | Yes |
Watchlist Syncing | No | Yes |
Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | MetaTrader (Default) | 104 |
Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
Mobile Charting - Multiple Time Frames | Yes | Yes |
Mobile Charting - Drawings Autosave | Yes | Yes |
Mobile Watchlist | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
Comparing market research at FP Markets vs Trading 212: FP Markets stands out with daily market commentary, plus third‑party tools from Autochartist and Trading Central for technical and fundamental insights. Both brokers stream forex news from top-tier sources (e.g., Bloomberg, Reuters, Dow Jones), offer a sentiment tool showing long/short positioning, and provide an economic calendar. Neither platform includes TipRanks or Acuity Trading integrations.
If you want more built-in research depth, FP Markets has the edge thanks to daily commentary and added analytics from well-known providers. That advantage shows up in the scores: FP Markets earns 4 stars for Research and ranks #25 out of 63 brokers at ForexBrokers.com, while Trading 212 holds 3.5 stars and ranks #45.
Feature |
|
|
---|---|---|
Daily Market Commentary | Yes | No |
Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes |
Autochartist | Yes | No |
Trading Central (Recognia) | Yes | No |
Social Sentiment - Currency Pairs | Yes | Yes |
TipRanks | No | No |
Signal Centre (Acuity Trading) | No | No |
Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
Both FP Markets and Trading 212 equip beginner traders with strong forex and CFD education. Each provides at least ten forex/CFD articles or videos, plus more than ten beginner videos and more than ten advanced videos. You also get a searchable archive of recorded webinars and a large investing glossary with 50+ terms from both brokers. The key difference is live training: FP Markets hosts client webinars at least monthly, while Trading 212 does not run regular live sessions.
For quality at a glance, FP Markets is rated 4 stars for Education, versus 3.5 stars for Trading 212, while ForexBrokers.com ranks Trading 212 slightly higher overall (#21) than FP Markets (#23) out of 63 brokers. If you want scheduled live webinars and a more guided learning path, FP Markets is the better fit. If you prefer self-paced learning with on-demand videos and a searchable webinar archive, Trading 212 works well.
Feature |
|
|
---|---|---|
Education (Forex or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
Client Webinars | Yes | No |
Client Webinars (Archived) | Yes | Yes |
Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Investor Dictionary (Glossary) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that FP Markets is better than Trading 212. FP Markets finished with an overall rank of #19, while Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #31.
FP Markets shines as a low-cost broker for trading forex and CFDs – as long as you use the MetaTrader platform. The Iress platform suite offers well over 9,000 tradeable symbols, but it’s mostly a share trading platform – and is generally a much pricier option.
Feature |
|
|
---|---|---|
Overall Rating |
|
|
Trust Score | 89 | 80 |
Range of Investments |
|
|
Commissions & Fees |
|
|
Platforms & Tools |
|
|
Research |
|
|
Mobile Trading |
|
|
Education |
|
|
Both FP Markets and Trading 212 do not offer the ability to buy actual (delivered) cryptocurrencies, but they do provide the option to trade cryptocurrency derivatives.
FP Markets and Trading 212 both support deposits and withdrawals via PayPal, Visa or Mastercard, and bank wires, but only Trading 212 offers ACH or SEPA transfers, while FP Markets uniquely accommodates Skrill transactions.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5Overall Rating | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
---|---|---|---|
Overall Rating |
|
| |
Commissions & Fees |
|
| |
Range of Investments |
|
| |
Platforms & Tools |
|
| |
Mobile Trading |
|
| |
Research |
|
| |
Education |
|
| |
Trust Score | 89 | 80 | |
Winner | check_circle | ||
Review | FP Markets Review | Trading 212 Review |
Broker Screenshots | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
---|---|---|---|
Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
Regulation | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
---|---|---|---|
Trust Score | 89 | 80 | |
Year Founded | 2005 | 2004 | |
Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No | |
Bank | No | No | |
Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes | |
Tier-1 Licenses | 2 | 3 | |
Tier-2 Licenses | 1 | 0 | |
Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
Tier-4 Licenses | 2 | 0 |
Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
---|---|---|---|
Australia (ASIC Authorised) | Yes | No | |
Canada (CIRO Authorised) | No | No | |
Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
Japan (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
Singapore (MAS Authorised) | No | No | |
Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | |||
United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | No | Yes | |
USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | No | |
New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | No | |
Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes |
Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
---|---|---|---|
Kenya (CMA Authorised) | |||
Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | No | |
South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
UAE (DFSA/Central Bank Authorised) | No | No | |
India (SEBI Authorised) | No | No | |
Jordan (JSC Authorised) |
Investments | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
---|---|---|---|
Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 10000 | 7868 | |
Forex Pairs (Total) | 71 | 146 | |
U.S. Stock Trading (Non CFD) | No | Yes | |
Int'l Stock Trading (Non CFD) | No | Yes | |
Social Trading / Copy Trading | Yes | No | |
Cryptocurrency (Physical) | No | No | |
Cryptocurrency (Derivative) | Yes | Yes | |
Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Cost | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
---|---|---|---|
Average Spread EUR/USD - Standard | 1.2 | 2.7 | |
All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.7 | 2.7 | |
Active Trader or VIP Discounts | Yes | No | |
Inactivity Fee | No | No | |
Execution: Agency Broker | No | Yes | |
Execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
Funding | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
---|---|---|---|
Minimum Deposit | $100 AUD | €1 | |
PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
Visa/Mastercard (Credit/Debit) | Yes | Yes | |
Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
ACH or SEPA Transfers | No | Yes |
Trading Platforms | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
---|---|---|---|
Proprietary Platform | Yes | Yes | |
Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No | |
Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
Social Trading / Copy Trading | Yes | No | |
MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No | |
MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No | |
cTrader | Yes | No | |
DupliTrade | No | No | |
ZuluTrade | No | No |
Trading Tools | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
---|---|---|---|
Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
Alerts - Basic Fields | Yes | Yes | |
Watchlists - Total Fields | 7 | 5 | |
Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 30 | 54 | |
Charting - Drawing Tools (Total) | 17 | 20 | |
Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
Mobile Trading | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
---|---|---|---|
Android App | Yes | Yes | |
Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
Mobile Alerts - Basic Fields | Yes | Yes | |
Mobile Watchlist | Yes | Yes | |
Watchlist Syncing | No | Yes | |
Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | MetaTrader (Default) | 104 | |
Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
Mobile Charting - Multiple Time Frames | Yes | Yes | |
Mobile Charting - Drawings Autosave | Yes | Yes | |
Mobile Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Research | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
---|---|---|---|
Daily Market Commentary | Yes | No | |
Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes | |
Autochartist | Yes | No | |
Trading Central (Recognia) | Yes | No | |
TipRanks | No | No | |
Social Sentiment - Currency Pairs | Yes | Yes | |
Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Education | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
---|---|---|---|
Education (Forex or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
Client Webinars | Yes | No | |
Client Webinars (Archived) | Yes | Yes | |
Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
Investor Dictionary (Glossary) | Yes | Yes |
Major Forex Pairs | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
---|---|---|---|
GBP/USD | Yes | Yes | |
USD/JPY | Yes | Yes | |
EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
USD/CHF | Yes | Yes | |
USD/CAD | Yes | Yes | |
NZD/USD | Yes | Yes | |
AUD/USD | Yes | Yes | |
Review | FP Markets Review | Trading 212 Review |
Overall | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
---|---|---|---|
Overall Rating |
|
| |
Commissions & Fees |
|
| |
Range of Investments |
|
| |
Platforms & Tools |
|
| |
Mobile Trading |
|
| |
Research |
|
| |
Education |
|
| |
Trust Score | 89 | 80 | |
Winner | check_circle | ||
Review | FP Markets Review | Trading 212 Review |