Written by ForexBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of FP Markets vs Trading 212, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
FP Markets, established in 2005, and Trading 212, founded in 2004, are both well-regarded online brokers. Neither company is publicly traded or operates as a bank. When it comes to regulatory standing, their Trust Scores reflect a solid level of dependability. FP Markets holds a Trust Score of 89 out of 99, placing it firmly in the 'trusted' category according to ForexBrokers.com. This broker is fortified by two Tier-1 licenses and one Tier-2 license, solidifying a strong framework of customer protection and industry compliance.
Trading 212, with a Trust Score of 80 out of 99, also falls into the 'trusted' tier, although at the lower end of this range. It distinguishes itself by holding three Tier-1 licenses, which are crucial markers of a broker's trustworthiness. However, unlike FP Markets, it lacks any Tier-2 licenses. Both brokers provide a reliable platform for online trading, each demonstrating their commitment to maintaining client trust and regulatory compliance.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2005 | 2004 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 2 | 3 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 1 | 0 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 1 | 0 |
When comparing FP Markets and Trading 212, FP Markets stands out with its highly competitive pricing, especially through its commission-based ECN account. Ranked #6 out of 63 brokers by ForexBrokers.com, FP Markets also earned a perfect 5-star rating for commissions and fees, recognized globally as one of the most cost-competitive choices for traders. It offers a variety of account types, including the Raw ECN account which boasts incredibly low spreads averaging 0.1 pips (0.8 pips including commission). However, its Iress ViewPoint account option is designed for active, high-balance traders and may not be the most affordable option for everyone.
In contrast, Trading 212 offers a more straightforward approach with its Invest and CFD accounts. Despite promoting zero-commission trading, traders are still subject to spreads, which are notably higher than the industry average. For the EUR/USD pair, Trading 212's average spread was 2.7 pips in April 2025. Although it holds a 4-star rating for commissions and fees, the higher spreads position Trading 212 at a disadvantage compared to leading CFD and forex brokers.
FP Markets offers a more cost-effective solution for traders interested in low spreads and comprehensive market access through its competitive pricing structure. Meanwhile, Trading 212 is appealing for those seeking a user-friendly platform without initial deposit constraints, although at the cost of higher spreads. With its superior ranking and perfect star rating, FP Markets demonstrates clear strengths in affordability and market depth.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $100 AUD | €1 |
| Average Spread EUR/USD - Standard | 1.2 | 2.7 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.7 | 2.7 |
| Active Trader or VIP Discounts | Yes | No |
| ACH or SEPA Transfers | No | Yes |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Visa/Mastercard (Credit/Debit) | Yes | Yes |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
When comparing FP Markets and Trading 212 for their range of investments, you'll notice distinct differences that cater to varying investor needs. Both platforms provide the opportunity for forex trading through CFDs or spot contracts, with FP Markets offering a more extensive total of 10,000 tradeable symbols compared to Trading 212's 7,868. However, Trading 212 has a broader selection of forex pairs, boasting 146 compared to FP Markets' 71. It's also worth highlighting that Trading 212 offers the ability to invest directly in exchange-traded securities on both U.S. and international exchanges—allowing you to buy shares of companies like Apple and Vodafone—while FP Markets does not. Instead, FP Markets attracts investors looking to leverage copy trading features, which Trading 212 does not offer.
For those interested in cryptocurrency, both brokers allow investment in cryptocurrency derivatives, although neither offers purchasing of the actual digital currencies. In terms of investment range, Trading 212 edges out FP Markets with a 5-star rating, while FP Markets holds a reputable 4.5-star rating. According to ForexBrokers.com, Trading 212 is ranked slightly higher at #15 compared to FP Markets at #18 out of 63 brokers, reflecting its diverse investment opportunities. These differences make Trading 212 a potentially better fit for those interested in a wide variety of international securities and forex pairs, while FP Markets may appeal to users seeking a broader range of symbols and copy trading features.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 10000 | 7868 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 71 | 146 |
| U.S. Stock Trading (Non CFD) | No | Yes |
| Int'l Stock Trading (Non CFD) | No | Yes |
| Social Trading / Copy Trading | Yes | No |
| Cryptocurrency (Physical) | No | No |
| Cryptocurrency (Derivative) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
FP Markets and Trading 212 both offer traders the chance to practice trading without financial risk through free virtual demo accounts. Additionally, each broker provides a proprietary trading platform developed in-house. For desktop users, FP Markets offers a downloadable Windows platform, while Trading 212 caters to web-oriented traders with its sleek web-based platform. Both brokers make browser-based trading accessible, though FP Markets stands out by supporting popular third-party platforms MetaTrader 4 (MT4) and MetaTrader 5 (MT5), which could appeal to traders interested in a wider range of tools and customization options. Traders using copy trading services might lean towards FP Markets as it supports this feature, unlike Trading 212.
When it comes to charting and analytics, Trading 212 offers an extended array with 20 drawing tools, slightly surpassing FP Markets' 17. Both platforms allow trading directly from a stock chart, providing a seamless experience for users who enjoy quick access points. FP Markets supports more fields in their watch lists, offering 7 columns compared to Trading 212’s 5. While both brokers earned a respectable 4-star rating for their trading platforms and tools, Trading 212 ranks a bit higher in a comparison of 63 brokers by ForexBrokers.com, securing the 20th position, whereas FP Markets is ranked 23rd. These features make both platforms strong choices, with the decision ultimately resting on a trader's specific needs and preferences.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Social Trading / Copy Trading | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No |
| DupliTrade | No | No |
| ZuluTrade | No | No |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 30 | 54 |
| Charting - Drawing Tools (Total) | 17 | 20 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
| Watchlists - Total Fields | 7 | 5 |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
FP Markets and Trading 212 both offer solid mobile trading apps for iPhone and Android users. They provide essential features like stock and forex price alerts, trendline drawing on charts, the ability to view multiple time frames, and watchlists with real-time quotes. However, the FP Markets app lacks watchlist symbol syncing, which is available with Trading 212, allowing for a seamless transition between devices and ensuring any updates are immediately reflected across platforms.
When it comes to charting, FP Markets utilizes the MetaTrader default technical studies, while Trading 212 impressively offers 104 options. Both apps automatically save drawings on charts, providing ease for users who frequently analyze chart patterns. Despite these differences, both platforms boast a commendable mobile app rating of 4 out of 5 stars; however, Trading 212 slightly edges out FP Markets in rankings by ForexBrokers.com, coming in at 17th place compared to FP Markets' 18th out of 63 brokers. This makes both apps excellent choices for traders seeking a comprehensive mobile trading experience.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Alerts - Basic Fields | Yes | Yes |
| Watchlist Syncing | No | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | MetaTrader (Default) | 104 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Multiple Time Frames | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Drawings Autosave | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlist | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
When comparing FP Markets and Trading 212 in terms of market research, FP Markets clearly provides a more comprehensive set of tools and resources. FP Markets offers daily market commentary and features forex news from top-tier sources like Bloomberg and Reuters, similar to Trading 212. However, FP Markets takes an edge with services like Autochartist and Trading Central, enabling users to perform both technical and fundamental analysis efficiently—a feature Trading 212 does not provide. Notably, both platforms offer sentiment-based trading tools and maintain an economic calendar to keep traders informed about global news events.
In terms of ratings, FP Markets receives 4 stars for research, ranking #25 out of 63 brokers according to ForexBrokers.com, while Trading 212 earns a slightly lower rating of 3.5 stars and is ranked #44. Although both platforms lack offerings from TipRanks and Acuity Trading, FP Markets' broader range of analytical tools and higher rating may make it a preferable choice for traders who rely heavily on research and market analysis. Overall, FP Markets stands out as the more resource-rich option for those seeking extensive market insights.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary | Yes | No |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes |
| Autochartist | Yes | No |
| Trading Central (Recognia) | Yes | No |
| Social Sentiment - Currency Pairs | Yes | Yes |
| TipRanks | No | No |
| Signal Centre (Acuity Trading) | No | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
When it comes to providing educational resources for beginners, both FP Markets and Trading 212 offer a comprehensive suite of materials to help new traders get started. Both platforms provide more than ten educational pieces focused on forex and CFDs, including articles, videos, and archived webinars. However, FP Markets goes a step further by providing regular monthly educational webinars, a feature that Trading 212 lacks. Both brokers offer a searchable archive of past webinars, making it easy to revisit previously covered topics. Additionally, each platform offers at least ten beginner-friendly videos to build foundational trading skills.
For those seeking to advance their trading knowledge, FP Markets and Trading 212 both offer ten advanced educational videos aimed at more experienced traders. To aid in understanding complex trading terminology, both brokers feature an investor dictionary with over 50 investing terms explained. In terms of ratings, FP Markets edges out with a 4-star education rating compared to Trading 212's 3.5 stars. However, Trading 212 is ranked slightly higher at #20 for education out of 63 brokers, while FP Markets holds the #23 spot. Overall, both platforms provide valuable educational resources, but FP Markets offers a few more interactive options for engaging with educational content.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Education (Forex or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Client Webinars | Yes | No |
| Client Webinars (Archived) | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Investor Dictionary (Glossary) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that FP Markets is better than Trading 212. FP Markets finished with an overall rank of #19, while Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #31.
FP Markets shines as a low-cost broker for trading forex and CFDs – as long as you use the MetaTrader platform. The Iress platform suite offers well over 9,000 tradeable symbols, but it’s mostly a share trading platform – and is generally a much pricier option.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 89 | 80 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Commissions & Fees |
|
|
| Platforms & Tools |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
Both FP Markets and Trading 212 do not offer the ability to buy actual (delivered) cryptocurrencies, but they do provide the option to trade cryptocurrency derivatives.
FP Markets and Trading 212 both support deposits and withdrawals via PayPal, Visa or Mastercard, and bank wires, but only Trading 212 offers ACH or SEPA transfers, while FP Markets uniquely accommodates Skrill transactions.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Commissions & Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Platforms & Tools |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 89 | 80 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | FP Markets Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Broker Screenshots | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trading Platforms Gallery (click to expand) |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading Gallery (click to expand) |
|
| |
| Research Gallery (click to expand) |
|
| |
| Education Gallery (click to expand) |
|
|
| Regulation | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 89 | 80 | |
| Year Founded | 2005 | 2004 | |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No | |
| Bank | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes | |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 2 | 3 | |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 1 | 0 | |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 1 | 0 |
| Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (ASIC Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| Canada (CIRO Authorised) | No | No | |
| Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Japan (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Singapore (MAS Authorised) | No | No | |
| Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | No | Yes | |
| USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | No | |
| New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes |
| Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya (CMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | No | |
| South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| UAE (DFSA/Central Bank Authorised) | No | No | |
| India (SEBI Authorised) | No | No | |
| Jordan (JSC Authorised) | No | No |
| Investments | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 10000 | 7868 | |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 71 | 146 | |
| U.S. Stock Trading (Non CFD) | No | Yes | |
| Int'l Stock Trading (Non CFD) | No | Yes | |
| Social Trading / Copy Trading | Yes | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (Physical) | No | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (Derivative) | Yes | Yes | |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
| Cost | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Spread EUR/USD - Standard | 1.2 | 2.7 | |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.7 | 2.7 | |
| Active Trader or VIP Discounts | Yes | No | |
| Inactivity Fee | No | No | |
| Execution: Agency Broker | No | Yes | |
| Execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
| Funding | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $100 AUD | €1 | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
| Visa/Mastercard (Credit/Debit) | Yes | Yes | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| ACH or SEPA Transfers | No | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No | |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Social Trading / Copy Trading | Yes | No | |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No | |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No | |
| cTrader | Yes | No | |
| DupliTrade | No | No | |
| ZuluTrade | No | No |
| Trading Tools | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
| Alerts - Basic Fields | Yes | Yes | |
| Watchlists - Total Fields | 7 | 5 | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 30 | 54 | |
| Charting - Drawing Tools (Total) | 17 | 20 | |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
| Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Trading | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Alerts - Basic Fields | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Watchlist | Yes | Yes | |
| Watchlist Syncing | No | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | MetaTrader (Default) | 104 | |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Multiple Time Frames | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Drawings Autosave | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Research | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary | Yes | No | |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes | |
| Autochartist | Yes | No | |
| Trading Central (Recognia) | Yes | No | |
| TipRanks | No | No | |
| Social Sentiment - Currency Pairs | Yes | Yes | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Education | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Education (Forex or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Client Webinars | Yes | No | |
| Client Webinars (Archived) | Yes | Yes | |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
| Investor Dictionary (Glossary) | Yes | Yes |
| Major Forex Pairs | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GBP/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/JPY | Yes | Yes | |
| EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/CHF | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/CAD | Yes | Yes | |
| NZD/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| AUD/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| Review | FP Markets Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Overall | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Commissions & Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Platforms & Tools |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 89 | 80 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | FP Markets Review | Trading 212 Review |
IG
CMC Markets
FOREX.com
XTB
eToro
AvaTrade
Plus500
Pepperstone
FP Markets
Tickmill