Written by ForexBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of FP Markets vs Trading 212, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
FP Markets (founded 2005) and Trading 212 (founded 2004) are online brokers that are not publicly traded and are not banks. Both cater to retail traders and investors, offering services without the backing of a listed parent company or banking charter.
Regulation is a key difference: FP Markets holds 2 Tier-1 licenses and 1 Tier-2 license, while Trading 212 holds 3 Tier-1 licenses and no Tier-2 licenses. ForexBrokers.com assigns FP Markets a Trust Score of 90/99 and Trading 212 an 82/99. On this scale, 90–99 is highly trusted, 80–89 trusted, 70–79 average risk, 60–69 high risk, and 59 or less should not be trusted. In short, FP Markets is rated highly trusted, and Trading 212 is rated trusted.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2005 | 2004 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 2 | 3 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 1 | 0 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 2 | 0 |
FP Markets comes out ahead of Trading 212 on commissions and fees, especially for active forex traders. FP Markets offers low-cost pricing on its MetaTrader and cTrader platforms, with its Raw ECN account standing out for tight spreads and a flat $6 round-turn commission per standard lot on forex trades. Its Standard account is more expensive because of wider spreads, and some of its Australian Iress account options can add platform and data costs unless you meet higher deposit or monthly trading requirements.
Trading 212 keeps things simple with a zero-commission model on its CFD account, but traders still pay the spread, which is where costs can rise. Trading 212 now shares average spread data, which helps with transparency, yet its EUR/USD average spread of 2.7 pips in April 2025 is well above the industry norm and makes it less competitive on pricing than FP Markets. For commissions and fees, FP Markets is rated 4.5 out of 5 stars and ranks #11 out of 36 brokers, while Trading 212 is rated 4 out of 5 stars and ranks #29 out of 36.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $0 | €1 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Spread-only account | 1.3 | 2.7 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Raw spread account | 0.9 | 2.7 |
| Non-wire bank transfer (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
When it comes to range of investments, both FP Markets and Trading 212 give traders access to forex as CFDs or spot contracts, but Trading 212 offers a wider overall selection. FP Markets lists 10,000 tradeable symbols and 71 forex pairs, while Trading 212 has 13,000 symbols and 180 forex pairs. Trading 212 also lets clients buy real shares on both U.S. and international exchanges, such as Apple and Vodafone, which FP Markets does not offer. On the other hand, FP Markets includes copy trading, while Trading 212 does not.
Both brokers offer cryptocurrency CFDs, but only Trading 212 allows customers to buy actual cryptocurrency. Based on ForexBrokers.com, FP Markets is rated 4.5 out of 5 for Range of Investments and ranks #17 out of 36 brokers, while Trading 212 scores a full 5 out of 5 and ranks #14. Overall, Trading 212 provides the broader investment range, while FP Markets may appeal to traders who want copy trading features.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 10000 | 13000 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 71 | 180 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | Yes |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | No | Yes |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | Yes |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
FP Markets and Trading 212 both give traders a free demo account, plus web-based platforms and the ability to trade directly from charts. Each broker is rated 4 out of 5 stars for trading platforms and tools, but Trading 212 holds a slightly higher spot in ForexBrokers.com’s rankings at #19 out of 36, compared with FP Markets at #22. This makes both options solid choices for traders who want easy access to markets and a user-friendly trading experience.
Where FP Markets pulls ahead is in platform choice and extra tools. It offers its own in-house platform, a Windows desktop download, copy trading, and support for both MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5, while Trading 212 does not offer these options. Trading 212 still covers the basics well, especially for traders who prefer a simple browser-based setup, but FP Markets gives more flexibility for those who want more platform types and advanced trading features.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | No |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 30 | 102 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
FP Markets and Trading 212 both offer mobile trading apps for iPhone and Android, along with price alerts, trendline drawing, and auto-saving chart drawings. Each broker is also rated 4 out of 5 stars for mobile trading apps, so both are solid choices for traders who want to manage positions on the go.
The main difference is in app features and sync. Trading 212 stands out because its watchlists sync between the mobile app and online account, which makes it easier to keep track of symbols across devices. It also offers 104 technical studies for charting, compared with FP Markets, which uses the default MetaTrader chart tools. In ForexBrokers.com’s mobile trading apps rankings, Trading 212 places higher at #17 out of 36 brokers, while FP Markets ranks #20.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | No | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | MetaTrader (Default) | 104 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
FP Markets has the edge over Trading 212 for market research, especially if you want more tools and daily insight. FP Markets offers daily market commentary, plus forex news from major sources like Bloomberg, Reuters, and Dow Jones. It also includes Autochartist and Trading Central for chart and signal-based analysis, along with a sentiment tool and an economic calendar. By contrast, Trading 212 also provides top-tier forex news, a sentiment tool, and an economic calendar, but it does not offer daily market commentary, Autochartist, or Trading Central.
Overall, FP Markets is stronger for research, earning 4 out of 5 stars and ranking #22 out of 36 brokers for the Research category at ForexBrokers.com. Trading 212 scores 3.5 out of 5 stars and ranks #31 out of 36. If market research matters to you, FP Markets gives traders more built-in analysis and market updates.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes |
| Autochartist | Yes | No |
| Trading Central | Yes | No |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes |
| TipRanks | No | No |
| Acuity Trading | No | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
FP Markets and Trading 212 both give beginners a solid range of learning tools, including at least 10 beginner videos and at least 10 advanced videos for more experienced traders. Both also offer forex or CFD education materials, but FP Markets stands out more for live learning support because it runs online educational client webinars at least once a month, while Trading 212 does not. That extra webinar access can make FP Markets more helpful for new traders who want guided, real-time explanations.
Overall, FP Markets has the edge in education. It holds a 4-star Education rating and ranks #21 out of 36 brokers in the ForexBrokers.com Education category, compared with Trading 212’s 3.5-star rating and #23 ranking. In plain terms, both brokers provide useful beginner-friendly content, but FP Markets offers a slightly stronger learning experience, especially for traders who value regular webinars alongside its video and forex/CFD education.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | Yes | No |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that FP Markets is better than Trading 212. FP Markets finished with an overall rank of #19, while Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #25.
FP Markets shines as a low-cost broker for trading forex and CFDs – as long as you use the MetaTrader platform. The Iress platform suite offers well over 10,000 tradeable symbols, but it’s mostly a share trading platform – and is generally a much pricier option.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 90 | 82 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Trading Fees |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
Comparing online brokers FP Markets vs Trading 212: Trading 212 lets you buy actual (delivered) cryptocurrency and also trade cryptocurrency CFDs, while FP Markets does not offer real crypto purchases and only provides cryptocurrency CFDs.
When comparing FP Markets vs Trading 212 for funding options, FP Markets supports PayPal, Skrill, and bank wire transfers but not ACH or SEPA, while Trading 212 supports bank wires but does not offer PayPal or Skrill.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 90 | 82 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | FP Markets Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Broker Screenshots | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
|
|
| Regulation | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 90 | 82 | |
| Year Founded | 2005 | 2004 | |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No | |
| Bank | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes | |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 2 | 3 | |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 1 | 0 | |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 2 | 0 |
| Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (ASIC Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| Canada (CIRO Authorised) | No | No | |
| Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Japan (FSA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Singapore (MAS Authorised) | No | No | |
| Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | |||
| United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | No | Yes | |
| USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | No | |
| New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes |
| Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya (CMA Authorised) | |||
| Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | No | |
| South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| UAE (DFSA, FSRA, or CMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| India (SEBI Authorised) | No | No | |
| Jordan (JSC Authorised) |
| Investments | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 10000 | 13000 | |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 71 | 180 | |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | Yes | |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | No | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | Yes | |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
| Cost | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Spread-only account | 1.3 | 2.7 | |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Raw spread account | 0.9 | 2.7 | |
| Inactivity Fee | No | No | |
| Order execution: Agency | No | Yes | |
| Order execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
| Funding | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $0 | €1 | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| Non-wire bank transfer (Deposit/Withdraw) | No |
| Trading Platforms | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | No | |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No | |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No | |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No | |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No | |
| cTrader | Yes | No |
| Trading Tools | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
| Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 30 | 102 | |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
| Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Trading | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | No | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | MetaTrader (Default) | 104 | |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Research - Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Research | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No | |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes | |
| Autochartist | Yes | No | |
| Trading Central | Yes | No | |
| TipRanks | No | No | |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Education | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | Yes | No | |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Major Forex Pairs | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| Review | FP Markets Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Overall | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 90 | 82 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | FP Markets Review | Trading 212 Review |
IG
FOREX.com
CMC Markets
XTB
eToro
Capital.com
AvaTrade
XM
Pepperstone
FP Markets
Tickmill
HFM Markets