Written by ForexBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of FP Markets vs Trading 212, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
FP Markets, established in 2005, and Trading 212, founded in 2004, are both well-regarded online brokers. Neither company is publicly traded or operates as a bank. When it comes to regulatory standing, their Trust Scores reflect a solid level of dependability. FP Markets holds a Trust Score of 89 out of 99, placing it firmly in the 'trusted' category according to ForexBrokers.com. This broker is fortified by two Tier-1 licenses and one Tier-2 license, solidifying a strong framework of customer protection and industry compliance.
Trading 212, with a Trust Score of 80 out of 99, also falls into the 'trusted' tier, although at the lower end of this range. It distinguishes itself by holding three Tier-1 licenses, which are crucial markers of a broker's trustworthiness. However, unlike FP Markets, it lacks any Tier-2 licenses. Both brokers provide a reliable platform for online trading, each demonstrating their commitment to maintaining client trust and regulatory compliance.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2005 | 2004 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 2 | 3 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 1 | 0 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 2 | 0 |
Comparing commissions and fees, FP Markets is the stronger value play for active forex and CFD traders, especially on its commission-based ECN setups. It holds a 5-star rating for Commissions and Fees and ranks #6 out of 63 brokers. Trading 212, while easy to start with and marketed as zero-commission, mostly charges via the spread on CFDs and forex; it carries a 4-star rating and ranks #50 out of 63.
FP Markets’ Raw ECN account averages 0.1 pips on EUR/USD (about 0.8 pips all-in after the $6 per round-turn, per standard lot commission), while its Standard account averages 1.1 pips. You can access these prices on MetaTrader or cTrader (spread-only Standard or commission-based Raw). FP Markets also earned Best in Class honors for Commissions and Fees in 2024. For share CFDs in Australia, the Iress ViewPoint suite provides DMA with full depth of book, but monthly platform/data fees may apply unless you’re on the Premier tier or generate at least AUD 150 in monthly commissions. The lower-cost Iress Investor option waives monthly fees but offers click-to-refresh quotes and basic charting.
Trading 212 offers Invest (shares) and CFD accounts, with very low minimums (EUR 1 for Invest, EUR 10 for CFD). For CFDs and forex, the broker’s “zero commission” model relies on the spread: its published average spread for EUR/USD was 2.7 pips in April 2025—well above the industry average—making it pricier for frequent traders than top competitors. Bottom line: FP Markets’ ECN pricing can deliver lower trading costs for active forex and CFD users, while Trading 212 may appeal to casual traders who prefer simple, low-entry pricing but can accept wider spreads.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $100 AUD | €1 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 1.2 | 2.7 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.7 | 2.7 |
| Non-wire bank transfer | No | Yes |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
FP Markets vs Trading 212: both let you trade forex via CFDs and spot, and both support cryptocurrency as CFDs (neither lets you buy actual crypto). FP Markets lists about 10,000 tradeable symbols, more than Trading 212’s 7,868. However, Trading 212 offers 146 forex pairs compared with 71 at FP Markets, which may appeal to currency traders who value more pair selection.
For real shares, the difference is clear: Trading 212 offers exchange-traded securities on both U.S. and international exchanges, while FP Markets does not. FP Markets does offer copy trading, which Trading 212 lacks. According to ForexBrokers.com, FP Markets earns 4.5/5 stars and ranks 19th out of 63 brokers for Range of Investments, while Trading 212 scores 5/5 stars and ranks 16th.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 10000 | 7868 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 71 | 146 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | Yes |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | No | Yes |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | No |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
FP Markets vs Trading 212: both brokers include a free demo account and their own proprietary platforms, plus web-based trading with the ability to place orders directly from charts. FP Markets adds a Windows desktop download, while Trading 212 does not. In expert reviews, each earns 4 out of 5 stars for trading platforms and tools; Trading 212 ranks #20 out of 63 brokers in this category at ForexBrokers.com, while FP Markets ranks #23.
If you want MetaTrader, FP Markets supports both MetaTrader 4 (MT4) and MetaTrader 5 (MT5); Trading 212 doesn’t offer either. FP Markets also offers copy trading, which Trading 212 does not. In short, FP Markets is appealing if you need MT4/MT5 or copy trading along with a Windows desktop option, while Trading 212 suits traders who prefer a simple, browser-first experience with strong in-house tools.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 30 | 54 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
FP Markets and Trading 212 both deliver capable mobile trading apps for iPhone and Android. Each app supports price alerts, lets you draw trendlines on charts, and auto-saves your chart annotations. Both brokers earned 4 stars for their mobile trading apps.
The key differences come down to syncing and indicators. Trading 212 syncs watchlists between the mobile app and your online account, while FP Markets does not. For charting, FP Markets relies on MetaTrader’s built-in studies, whereas Trading 212 offers 104 technical studies in-app. In ForexBrokers.com’s Mobile Trading Apps ranking out of 63 brokers, Trading 212 placed #17 and FP Markets #18. If you want seamless watchlist syncing and a larger set of indicators, Trading 212 has a slight edge; if you prefer the MetaTrader experience, FP Markets is a solid pick.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | No | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | MetaTrader (Default) | 104 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
Comparing market research at FP Markets vs Trading 212: FP Markets stands out with daily market commentary, plus third‑party tools from Autochartist and Trading Central for technical and fundamental insights. Both brokers stream forex news from top-tier sources (e.g., Bloomberg, Reuters, Dow Jones), offer a sentiment tool showing long/short positioning, and provide an economic calendar. Neither platform includes TipRanks or Acuity Trading integrations.
If you want more built-in research depth, FP Markets has the edge thanks to daily commentary and added analytics from well-known providers. That advantage shows up in the scores: FP Markets earns 4 stars for Research and ranks #25 out of 63 brokers at ForexBrokers.com, while Trading 212 holds 3.5 stars and ranks #45.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes |
| Autochartist | Yes | No |
| Trading Central | Yes | No |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes |
| TipRanks | No | No |
| Acuity Trading | No | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
FP Markets vs Trading 212 for beginner education: both brokers provide at least 10 beginner-friendly trading videos and at least 10 advanced videos, helping new traders grow at their own pace. FP Markets also hosts client webinars at least once a month, while Trading 212 does not run recurring educational webinars. In ForexBrokers.com’s Education category, FP Markets is rated 4 stars and ranks 23rd out of 63 brokers; Trading 212 is rated 3.5 stars and ranks 21st.
The data here does not confirm whether either broker offers 10 or more total forex/CFD educational pieces beyond the video counts. If live, interactive learning is important, FP Markets stands out for its ongoing webinars. If you prefer on-demand video lessons, both brokers deliver. For rankings, Trading 212 edges ahead; for star rating and live sessions, FP Markets has the advantage.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | Yes | No |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that FP Markets is better than Trading 212. FP Markets finished with an overall rank of #19, while Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #31.
FP Markets shines as a low-cost broker for trading forex and CFDs – as long as you use the MetaTrader platform. The Iress platform suite offers well over 9,000 tradeable symbols, but it’s mostly a share trading platform – and is generally a much pricier option.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 89 | 80 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Commissions & Fees |
|
|
| Platforms & Tools |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
FP Markets vs Trading 212: neither broker lets you buy actual (delivered) cryptocurrency, but both support cryptocurrency CFD trading.
Comparing FP Markets vs Trading 212 for deposits and withdrawals: FP Markets does not support ACH/SEPA while Trading 212 does; both accept PayPal and bank wires; FP Markets supports Skrill but Trading 212 does not; Visa/Mastercard availability is unspecified for both.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Commissions & Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Platforms & Tools |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 89 | 80 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | FP Markets Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Broker Screenshots | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
|
|
| Regulation | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 89 | 80 | |
| Year Founded | 2005 | 2004 | |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No | |
| Bank | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes | |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 2 | 3 | |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 1 | 0 | |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 2 | 0 |
| Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (ASIC Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| Canada (CIRO Authorised) | No | No | |
| Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Japan (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Singapore (MAS Authorised) | No | No | |
| Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | |||
| United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | No | Yes | |
| USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | No | |
| New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes |
| Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya (CMA Authorised) | |||
| Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | No | |
| South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| UAE (DFSA, FSRA, or SCA Authorised) | No | No | |
| India (SEBI Authorised) | No | No | |
| Jordan (JSC Authorised) |
| Investments | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 10000 | 7868 | |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 71 | 146 | |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | Yes | |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | No | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
| Cost | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 1.2 | 2.7 | |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.7 | 2.7 | |
| Inactivity Fee | No | No | |
| Order execution: Agency | No | Yes | |
| Order execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
| Funding | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $100 AUD | €1 | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| Non-wire bank transfer | No | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No | |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No | |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No | |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No | |
| cTrader | Yes | No |
| Trading Tools | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
| Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 30 | 54 | |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
| Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Trading | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Watchlist [DELETED] | |||
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | No | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | MetaTrader (Default) | 104 | |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Research - Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Research | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No | |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes | |
| Autochartist | Yes | No | |
| Trading Central | Yes | No | |
| TipRanks | No | No | |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Education | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | Yes | No | |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Major Forex Pairs | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GBP/USD [DELETED] | |||
| USD/JPY [DELETED] | |||
| EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/CHF [DELETED] | |||
| USD/CAD [DELETED] | |||
| NZD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| AUD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| Review | FP Markets Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Overall | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Commissions & Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Platforms & Tools |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 89 | 80 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | FP Markets Review | Trading 212 Review |
IG
CMC Markets
FOREX.com
XTB
eToro
AvaTrade
Plus500
Pepperstone
FP Markets
Tickmill