Written by ForexBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of FP Markets vs Trading 212, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
FP Markets, established in 2005, and Trading 212, founded in 2004, are both well-regarded online brokers. Neither company is publicly traded or operates as a bank. When it comes to regulatory standing, their Trust Scores reflect a solid level of dependability. FP Markets holds a Trust Score of 89 out of 99, placing it firmly in the 'trusted' category according to ForexBrokers.com. This broker is fortified by two Tier-1 licenses and one Tier-2 license, solidifying a strong framework of customer protection and industry compliance.
Trading 212, with a Trust Score of 80 out of 99, also falls into the 'trusted' tier, although at the lower end of this range. It distinguishes itself by holding three Tier-1 licenses, which are crucial markers of a broker's trustworthiness. However, unlike FP Markets, it lacks any Tier-2 licenses. Both brokers provide a reliable platform for online trading, each demonstrating their commitment to maintaining client trust and regulatory compliance.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2005 | 2004 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 2 | 3 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 1 | 0 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 2 | 0 |
FP Markets generally delivers lower trading costs than Trading 212, especially if you use its commission-based Raw ECN account. FP Markets earned Best in Class honors for Commissions and Fees in 2024, holds a 5/5 star rating, and ranks #11 out of 63 brokers for this category. Trading 212 advertises zero-commission CFD trading, but its wider spreads make it pricier in practice; it holds a 4/5 star rating and ranks #27 out of 63.
With FP Markets, the Raw ECN account averaged 0.1 pips on EUR/USD in Oct 2023 (about 0.8 pips all-in after a $6 per round-turn commission per standard lot). Its Standard account averaged 1.1 pips. You can trade these on MetaTrader or cTrader. FP Markets also offers Iress with Direct Market Access (DMA) and full depth of book; however, the ViewPoint tiers (Standard/Platinum/Premier) can carry platform and data fees unless you’re on Premier or generate at least AUD 150 in monthly commissions. The Iress Investor option waives monthly fees but limits features such as default streaming data and charting.
Trading 212’s Invest account has a €1 minimum deposit and its CFD account requires €10. While it markets zero-commission trading, you pay the spread on CFDs and forex. Trading 212’s published average spread for EUR/USD was 2.7 pips in April 2025—well above industry norms and higher than FP Markets’ Raw ECN all-in cost—making FP Markets the more cost-efficient choice on spreads for active forex and CFD traders.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $100 AUD | €1 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 1.3 | 2.7 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.9 | 2.7 |
| Non-wire bank transfer | No | Yes |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
FP Markets and Trading 212 both support forex trading, available as CFDs or spot contracts. FP Markets lists about 10,000 tradable symbols, while Trading 212 offers 7,868. For currency pairs, Trading 212 leads with 146 versus FP Markets’ 71. Neither broker lets you buy actual crypto, but both provide crypto CFDs. FP Markets includes copy trading; Trading 212 does not.
For exchange-traded securities, Trading 212 lets you buy real shares on both U.S. and international exchanges, whereas FP Markets does not offer real share dealing. Based on ForexBrokers.com’s Range of Investments scores, FP Markets earns 4.5/5 stars (ranked 16th of 63), and Trading 212 scores 5/5 stars (ranked 15th of 63). Choose FP Markets if you want copy trading and a very large overall instrument list; choose Trading 212 if you want access to real stocks worldwide and a wider selection of forex pairs.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 10000 | 7868 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 71 | 146 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | Yes |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | No | Yes |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | No |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
In the FP Markets vs Trading 212 platform comparison, both brokers provide a free paper trading demo and their own proprietary platforms, plus convenient web-based trading and the ability to place trades directly from charts. FP Markets adds a Windows desktop platform, copy trading, and full MetaTrader support (MT4 and MT5), while Trading 212 lacks a downloadable Windows platform, copy trading, and MetaTrader. The number of built-in technical indicators and watch list columns isn’t specified for either broker.
For Trading Platforms and Tools, both earn 4 out of 5 stars. In ForexBrokers.com’s category rankings out of 63 brokers, Trading 212 is #19 and FP Markets is #22. Choose FP Markets if you want Windows desktop trading, copy trading, and MT4/MT5; pick Trading 212 if a simple, proprietary, browser-based experience is your priority.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 30 | 54 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
FP Markets vs Trading 212 for mobile trading: both brokers offer iPhone and Android apps, along with stock and forex price alerts. Charting tools on both apps let you draw trendlines and automatically save your drawings. Each earns 4 stars for Mobile Trading Apps, with Trading 212 ranked #17 and FP Markets #20 out of 63 brokers by ForexBrokers.com.
The bigger differences are in charting depth and watchlists. Trading 212 includes 104 technical studies and syncs watchlists between the mobile app and your online account. FP Markets bases its mobile charting on MetaTrader’s default indicator set and does not sync watchlists with the online account.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | No | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | MetaTrader (Default) | 104 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
Comparing market research between FP Markets and Trading 212, FP Markets takes the lead with a 4-star research rating and a #22 ranking out of 63 brokers by ForexBrokers.com, while Trading 212 holds 3.5 stars and ranks #32. FP Markets provides daily market commentary, while Trading 212 does not. Both brokers deliver forex news from top-tier sources such as Bloomberg, Reuters, or Dow Jones, and each includes an economic calendar and a sentiment tool that shows the ratio of long vs. short positions.
FP Markets stands out for its built-in technical and fundamental research tools, offering Autochartist and Trading Central—two popular services for trade ideas and analysis—whereas Trading 212 lacks both. Neither broker includes TipRanks or Acuity Trading integrations. If you want frequent insights and advanced screening tools, FP Markets is the more research-friendly choice; if you only need news, sentiment, and an economic calendar, Trading 212 covers the basics.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes |
| Autochartist | Yes | No |
| Trading Central | Yes | No |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes |
| TipRanks | No | No |
| Acuity Trading | No | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
For beginners comparing FP Markets and Trading 212, both brokers offer a sizable library of video lessons, including at least 10 beginner-focused videos and at least 10 advanced videos. FP Markets adds monthly client webinars, giving newcomers a chance to learn in real time and ask questions, while Trading 212 does not host monthly educational webinars. If live sessions help you grasp trading faster, FP Markets has the edge; if you prefer self-paced video learning, both brokers can work well.
On quality scores, FP Markets is rated 4 stars for Education, while Trading 212 earns 3.5 stars. In ForexBrokers.com’s Education rankings out of 63 brokers, Trading 212 is placed at #20 and FP Markets at #22, showing a close overall contest. In short: pick FP Markets if ongoing webinars matter to you; choose Trading 212 if you’re content with a strong video-led path. Either way, beginners will find plenty of structured lessons to get started.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | Yes | No |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that FP Markets is better than Trading 212. FP Markets finished with an overall rank of #19, while Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #25.
FP Markets shines as a low-cost broker for trading forex and CFDs – as long as you use the MetaTrader platform. The Iress platform suite offers well over 9,000 tradeable symbols, but it’s mostly a share trading platform – and is generally a much pricier option.
| Feature |
FP Markets
|
Trading 212
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 89 | 80 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Trading Fees |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
FP Markets vs Trading 212: neither broker lets you buy actual (delivered) cryptocurrency, but both support cryptocurrency CFD trading.
Comparing FP Markets vs Trading 212 for deposits and withdrawals: FP Markets does not support ACH/SEPA while Trading 212 does; both accept PayPal and bank wires; FP Markets supports Skrill but Trading 212 does not; Visa/Mastercard availability is unspecified for both.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 89 | 80 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | FP Markets Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Broker Screenshots | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
|
|
| Regulation | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 89 | 80 | |
| Year Founded | 2005 | 2004 | |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No | |
| Bank | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes | |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 2 | 3 | |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 1 | 0 | |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 2 | 0 |
| Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (ASIC Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| Canada (CIRO Authorised) | No | No | |
| Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Japan (FSA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Singapore (MAS Authorised) | No | No | |
| Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | |||
| United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | No | Yes | |
| USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | No | |
| New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes |
| Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya (CMA Authorised) | |||
| Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | No | |
| South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| UAE (DFSA, FSRA, or SCA Authorised) | No | No | |
| India (SEBI Authorised) | No | No | |
| Jordan (JSC Authorised) |
| Investments | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 10000 | 7868 | |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 71 | 146 | |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | Yes | |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | No | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
| Cost | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 1.3 | 2.7 | |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.9 | 2.7 | |
| Inactivity Fee | No | No | |
| Order execution: Agency | No | Yes | |
| Order execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
| Funding | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $100 AUD | €1 | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| Non-wire bank transfer | No | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | No | |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No | |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | No | |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | Yes | No | |
| cTrader | Yes | No |
| Trading Tools | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
| Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 30 | 54 | |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
| Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Trading | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Watchlist [DELETED] | |||
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | No | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | MetaTrader (Default) | 104 | |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Research - Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Research | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | No | |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes | |
| Autochartist | Yes | No | |
| Trading Central | Yes | No | |
| TipRanks | No | No | |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Education | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | Yes | No | |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Major Forex Pairs | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GBP/USD [DELETED] | |||
| USD/JPY [DELETED] | |||
| EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/CHF [DELETED] | |||
| USD/CAD [DELETED] | |||
| NZD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| AUD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| Review | FP Markets Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Overall | FP Markets | Trading 212 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 89 | 80 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | FP Markets Review | Trading 212 Review |
IG
CMC Markets
FOREX.com
XTB
eToro
AvaTrade
Pepperstone
FP Markets
Tickmill