Written by ForexBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of Capital.com vs IFC Markets, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Capital.com, established in 2016, and IFC Markets, founded in 2006, both offer online brokerage services, yet differ significantly in their regulatory standings. Capital.com boasts a higher ForexBrokers.com Trust Score of 87, marking it as a trusted platform. In comparison, IFC Markets holds a Trust Score of 73, placing it in the average risk category. Neither company is publicly traded or operates as a bank. However, Capital.com holds three Tier-1 licenses, renowned for high trust, while IFC Markets has none. Both brokers maintain one Tier-2 license, recognized as trusted but less stringent than Tier-1 regulations.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
IFC Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2016 | 2006 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 0 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 1 | 1 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 2 | 1 |
When comparing commissions and fees, Capital.com comes out cheaper than IFC Markets for most forex traders. Capital.com earns 5 out of 5 stars and ranks #3 of 63 brokers for Commissions and Fees at ForexBrokers.com, while IFC Markets earns 4 out of 5 stars and ranks #40 of 63. The headline difference is pricing on EUR/USD: Capital.com’s average spread is lower, which can cut trading costs day to day.
Capital.com lists a dynamic EUR/USD spread of about 0.67 pips, and its verified April 2024 average was 0.6712 pips—lower than the industry average—making it a strong pick for low-cost forex trading. Pricing is slightly better than the industry average overall. Capital.com offers a universal account for retail traders as well as a professional account for eligible clients; note that professional clients do not receive the same regulatory protections as retail traders.
IFC Markets’ average EUR/USD spread is 1.44 pips, higher than the 1.08-pip industry average, so its standard pricing is less competitive. That said, active traders can find better value via the ECN account, where effective spreads are about 1.1 pips after a 0.005% commission is applied to both sides of a trade. IFC Markets also charges no inactivity fees and offers active trader discounts, which can help offset costs over time.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
IFC Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $10 | $1 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 0.64 | 1.44 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.67 | 1.1 |
| Non-wire bank transfer | No | No |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | No |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
Comparing Capital.com vs IFC Markets for range of investments: Capital.com offers a much wider selection with 5,585 tradeable symbols and 125 forex pairs, while IFC Markets lists 630 symbols and 49 forex pairs. Both brokers support forex trading as CFDs or spot and allow trading crypto via CFDs (neither lets you buy actual cryptocurrency). Neither broker offers U.S. exchange-traded stocks, but IFC Markets does provide access to certain international exchange-traded securities, which Capital.com does not.
For extra features, IFC Markets includes copy trading, whereas Capital.com does not. Based on breadth alone, Capital.com earns 4.5/5 stars and ranks #23 out of 63 for Range of Investments, compared with IFC Markets at 3.5/5 stars and #44. Choose Capital.com if you want more markets and forex pairs; pick IFC Markets if you value copy trading and access to some international exchange-traded shares.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
IFC Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 5585 | 630 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 125 | 49 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | No |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | No | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | No |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
Capital.com and IFC Markets both check key boxes for trading platforms and tools. Each offers a free demo account, an in-house proprietary platform, and access to MetaTrader 4 (MT4). You can trade in a web browser or via a Windows desktop app with either broker, and both let you place orders straight from the chart. The standout differences: IFC Markets supports MetaTrader 5 (MT5) and offers copy trading, while Capital.com does not support MT5 and does not offer copy trading.
For quality and recognition, Capital.com is rated 4.5/5 stars for Trading Platforms and Tools and ranks #10 out of 63 brokers on ForexBrokers.com. IFC Markets earns 4/5 stars and ranks #37. In short, choose IFC Markets if MT5 or copy trading matters to you, and pick Capital.com if you prefer a higher-rated platform experience.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
IFC Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | Yes |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | Yes |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | Yes |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 97 | 30 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
Comparing the mobile trading apps from Capital.com and IFC Markets, both brokers cover the essentials for trading on the go. Each offers iPhone and Android apps, real-time price alerts for stocks and forex, 30 built-in technical indicators, the ability to draw trendlines, and automatic saving of chart drawings. The key difference is watchlists: IFC Markets syncs watchlist symbols between the mobile app and your online account, while Capital.com does not.
According to ForexBrokers.com, Capital.com earns a 4.5-star rating and ranks #11 out of 63 brokers for Mobile Trading Apps, while IFC Markets scores 4 stars and ranks #53. If you want a higher-rated mobile experience, Capital.com stands out. If syncing your watchlists across devices is a priority, IFC Markets has the edge.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
IFC Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | No | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 30 | 30 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
When it comes to market research, both Capital.com and IFC Markets deliver daily market commentary, a sentiment tool showing long/short positioning, and an economic calendar. The key differences are in news and third‑party insights: Capital.com streams forex news from top-tier sources such as Bloomberg/Reuters/Dow Jones and includes TipRanks research, while IFC Markets does not offer those two features. Neither broker provides tools from Autochartist, Trading Central, or Acuity Trading.
These gaps translate into stronger in-platform research for Capital.com, which earns 4.5 out of 5 stars and ranks #14 of 63 brokers for Research at ForexBrokers.com. IFC Markets is rated 3.5 stars and ranks #41. If you want mainstream news feeds and analyst-driven ideas alongside core tools, Capital.com has the edge; if your needs are basic commentary, sentiment, and a calendar, either broker will do.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
IFC Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | Yes |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | No |
| Autochartist | No | No |
| Trading Central | No | No |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes |
| TipRanks | Yes | No |
| Acuity Trading | No | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
Capital.com and IFC Markets both provide forex and CFD education that meets the 10-piece threshold, giving beginners a clear place to start. Each broker offers at least 10 beginner videos and at least 10 advanced videos, so you can move from basics to more complex topics at your own pace. Neither broker runs monthly educational webinars, which means live, interactive sessions are limited; most learning happens through videos and on-demand content.
For overall quality, Capital.com stands out with a 4.5-star Education rating and a #8 ranking out of 63 brokers on ForexBrokers.com, while IFC Markets holds a 3.5-star rating and ranks #30. If you’re new to trading and want a richer learning path with more depth, Capital.com is the stronger pick. IFC Markets still offers plenty for beginners, but Capital.com typically delivers a more polished education experience.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
IFC Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | No |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that Capital.com is better than IFC Markets. Capital.com finished with an overall rank of #10, while IFC Markets finished with an overall rank of #45.
Capital.com stands out for its quality research, strong educational content, and innovative web platform. Capital.com holds fewer regulatory licenses and offers a narrower range of markets than some of the best brokers, but still significantly outperforms the industry average.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
IFC Markets
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 87 | 73 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Commissions & Fees |
|
|
| Platforms & Tools |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
In this comparison, online brokers Capital.com and IFC Markets both do not offer the ability to buy actual (delivered) cryptocurrency, but each does provide cryptocurrency CFD trading.
Capital.com vs IFC Markets: neither supports ACH or SEPA transfers; Capital.com supports PayPal, Skrill, and bank wire deposits/withdrawals, while IFC Markets lacks PayPal and Skrill and offers only bank wires; Visa/Mastercard availability is not specified for either.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | Capital.com | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Commissions & Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Platforms & Tools |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 87 | 73 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Capital.com Review |
| Broker Screenshots | Capital.com | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
IG
CMC Markets
FOREX.com
XTB
eToro
AvaTrade
Pepperstone
FP Markets
Tickmill