Interactive Brokers vs IFC Markets 2026
In this head to head comparison of Interactive Brokers vs IFC Markets, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
In this head to head comparison of Interactive Brokers vs IFC Markets, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Interactive Brokers, established in 1977, is a well-known choice in the online brokerage industry. It stands out with its impressive ForexBrokers.com Trust Score of 99, putting it in the highly trusted category. The company is publicly traded, enhancing transparency and investor confidence. Despite not being a bank, Interactive Brokers holds a significant number of regulatory approvals with 9 Tier-1 licenses deemed highly trusted and 2 Tier-2 licenses indicating a trusted status. This solid regulatory framework makes Interactive Brokers a preferred choice for many investors seeking security and reliability in their online trading experiences.
On the other hand, IFC Markets, founded in 2006, presents a more moderate risk profile with a ForexBrokers.com Trust Score of 73, placing it in the average risk category. Unlike Interactive Brokers, IFC Markets is not publicly traded, which may influence investor perceptions of transparency. The company does not hold any Tier-1 licenses, but it does maintain 1 Tier-2 license, suggesting a foundational level of trust. While both brokers are not banks, the differences in their regulatory and trust profiles are key factors for potential investors to consider when choosing between these platforms.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 1977 | 2006 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | Yes | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 9 | 0 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 2 | 1 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 1 |
Interactive Brokers earns 5 out of 5 stars for commissions and fees and ranks #2 out of 63 brokers, while IFC Markets earns 4 out of 5 stars and ranks #32 out of 63. In practice, Interactive Brokers is usually cheaper for standard-lot forex traders, whereas IFC Markets is easier to read with published spreads and no inactivity fee. IFC’s ECN account narrows the gap, but Interactive Brokers still tends to deliver lower all-in costs on EUR/USD for sufficiently sized trades.
Interactive Brokers quotes tight prices from 17 major banks and charges a commission instead of marking up the spread. In Q3 2024, the EUR/USD averaged about 0.19 pips at IBKR, translating to roughly 0.59 pips all-in after commission. Commissions start at 0.2 basis points per side with a $2 minimum per order ($4 round turn), which is about 0.40 pips on a $100,000 EUR/USD trade; trading smaller than a standard lot gets proportionally pricier due to the minimum. Volume discounts can cut the minimum to $1.50 per order above $1 billion in monthly volume and $1 per order above $5 billion, and pricing ranges around $16–$40 per million round turn. IBKR Lite and IBKR Pro both support forex, but neither is commission-free.
IFC Markets lists an average EUR/USD spread of 1.44 pips (above the 1.08-pip industry average). Its ECN account improves effective pricing to about 1.1 pips after a 0.005% commission on both sides. The broker does not charge inactivity fees and offers active-trader discounts, which will appeal to cost-conscious clients who prefer straightforward pricing. Still, for traders executing standard or larger lot sizes, Interactive Brokers typically provides lower all-in costs.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $0 | $1 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 0.59 | 1.44 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.65 | 1.1 |
| Non-wire bank transfer | Yes | No |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | No |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | No |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
Interactive Brokers stands out for range of investments: it offers about 8,500 tradeable symbols and 90 forex pairs, compared with IFC Markets’ 630 symbols and 49 pairs. Interactive Brokers supports exchange-traded securities on both U.S. and international exchanges, so you can buy shares like Apple on NASDAQ as well as overseas listings. IFC Markets offers exchange-traded securities on international exchanges but not on U.S. exchanges.
Both brokers let you trade forex as either a CFD or spot contract. For crypto, Interactive Brokers offers both actual coins and crypto CFDs, while IFC Markets limits crypto to CFDs. IFC Markets provides copy trading; Interactive Brokers does not. In ForexBrokers.com’s Range of Investments ratings, Interactive Brokers scores 5 stars and ranks #1 out of 63 brokers, whereas IFC Markets scores 3.5 stars and ranks #31.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 8500 | 630 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 90 | 49 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | Yes | No |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | Yes | No |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
When comparing Interactive Brokers and IFC Markets for trading platforms and tools, both brokers check key boxes for getting started: each offers a free paper trading (demo) account, an in-house proprietary platform, a Windows desktop download, and a web-based platform. You can place trades directly from charts with either broker. The biggest platform differences are third‑party options: IFC Markets supports MetaTrader 4 (MT4) and MetaTrader 5 (MT5) and includes copy trading, while Interactive Brokers does not support MT4/MT5 and does not offer copy trading.
For overall platform quality, Interactive Brokers earns 5 stars and ranks #2 out of 63 brokers for Trading Platforms and Tools, while IFC Markets earns 4 stars and ranks #29. Choose Interactive Brokers if you want a top-rated, feature-rich in-house experience with chart trading across desktop and web. Pick IFC Markets if MetaTrader or copy trading is important to your workflow.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | Yes |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | No | Yes |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | Yes |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 155 | 30 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
Interactive Brokers and IFC Markets both deliver full-featured mobile trading apps for iPhone and Android. Each app supports price alerts and watchlist syncing with your online account, so changes carry over across devices. Charting basics are covered on both, including the ability to draw trendlines, making it easy to mark levels and track setups on the go.
Where they differ is depth and workflow. Interactive Brokers offers 97 technical studies in its mobile charts versus 30 at IFC Markets, giving data-driven traders more tools to test ideas. On the flip side, IFC Markets automatically saves chart drawings, while Interactive Brokers does not. In our ratings, Interactive Brokers earns 5 stars and ranks #4 out of 63 brokers for Mobile Trading Apps on ForexBrokers.com, while IFC Markets earns 4 stars and ranks #34. Choose Interactive Brokers for the widest range of indicators, or IFC Markets if auto-saving your annotations matters most.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 97 | 30 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | No | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
Interactive Brokers vs IFC Markets for market research: both brokers provide daily market commentary, an economic calendar, and a sentiment tool showing the ratio of long vs. short positions. The key differences show up in news and third‑party research. Interactive Brokers delivers forex news from top-tier sources like Bloomberg, Reuters, or Dow Jones, and adds well-known research tools from Trading Central, TipRanks, and Acuity Trading (Signal Centre). Neither broker includes Autochartist, and IFC Markets does not offer those third-party research integrations or top-tier news feeds.
Ratings reflect this gap. Interactive Brokers earns 5 out of 5 stars for Research and ranks #3 out of 63 brokers at ForexBrokers.com, while IFC Markets scores 3.5 out of 5 and ranks #30. If you want deeper news coverage and more analyst tools, Interactive Brokers is the stronger choice; if you only need core features like commentary, calendars, and sentiment, IFC Markets covers the basics.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | Yes |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | No |
| Autochartist | No | No |
| Trading Central | Yes | No |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes |
| TipRanks | Yes | No |
| Acuity Trading | Yes | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
For beginners comparing education at Interactive Brokers and IFC Markets, Interactive Brokers is the clear leader. ForexBrokers.com rates Interactive Brokers 5 stars for Education and ranks it #1 out of 63 brokers, while IFC Markets earns 3.5 stars and ranks #25. Interactive Brokers also hosts client webinars at least once a month, giving newcomers a steady stream of live learning opportunities; IFC Markets does not offer monthly educational webinars. Both brokers provide at least 10 beginner videos and at least 10 advanced videos, so you can find content that starts with the basics and progresses to more complex trading topics.
The data provided does not specify whether either broker publishes 10 or more education pieces focused specifically on forex or CFDs. Still, if you want top-rated education with frequent live sessions, Interactive Brokers is the stronger pick. If you mainly want a video library to learn at your own pace, IFC Markets can get you started, though it offers fewer overall learning perks than Interactive Brokers.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | Yes | No |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that Interactive Brokers is better than IFC Markets. Interactive Brokers finished with an overall rank of #2, while IFC Markets finished with an overall rank of #33.
Interactive Brokers is a highly trusted multi-asset broker with an extensive offering of tradeable global markets. It delivers competitive fees and high-quality research and education, as well as a modern, institutional-grade trading platform suite.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 99 | 73 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Trading Fees |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
Compared with IFC Markets, which supports only cryptocurrency CFDs (no delivered coins), Interactive Brokers lets you buy actual delivered cryptocurrency and trade crypto CFDs.
Comparing deposit and withdrawal methods, Interactive Brokers supports ACH/SEPA and bank wire transfers while IFC Markets supports bank wires but not ACH/SEPA; neither broker offers PayPal or Skrill, and Visa/Mastercard availability is not specified.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | Interactive Brokers | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 99 | 73 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Interactive Brokers Review |
| Broker Screenshots | Interactive Brokers | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
| Regulation | Interactive Brokers | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 99 | 73 | |
| Year Founded | 1977 | 2006 | |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | Yes | No | |
| Bank | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | ||
| Tier-1 Licenses | 9 | 0 | |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 2 | 1 | |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 1 |
| Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | Interactive Brokers | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (ASIC Authorised) | Yes | ||
| Canada (CIRO Authorised) | Yes | ||
| Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | Yes | ||
| Japan (FSA Authorised) | Yes | ||
| Singapore (MAS Authorised) | Yes | ||
| Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | Yes | ||
| United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | Yes | ||
| USA (CFTC Authorized) | Yes | ||
| New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | ||
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes |
| Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | Interactive Brokers | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya (CMA Authorised) | |||
| Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | ||
| South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | No | Yes | |
| UAE (DFSA, FSRA, or SCA Authorised) | Yes | ||
| India (SEBI Authorised) | Yes | ||
| Jordan (JSC Authorised) |
| Investments | Interactive Brokers | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 8500 | 630 | |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 90 | 49 | |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | Yes | No | |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes | |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | Yes | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
| Cost | Interactive Brokers | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 0.59 | 1.44 | |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.65 | 1.1 | |
| Inactivity Fee | No | No | |
| Order execution: Agency | Yes | Yes | |
| Order execution: Market Maker | No | Yes |
| Funding | Interactive Brokers | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $0 | $1 | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | No | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | No | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| Non-wire bank transfer | Yes | No |
| Trading Platforms | Interactive Brokers | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | Yes | |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes | |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | No | Yes | |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | Yes | |
| cTrader | No | No |
| Trading Tools | Interactive Brokers | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
| Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 155 | 30 | |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
| Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Trading | Interactive Brokers | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Watchlist [DELETED] | |||
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 97 | 30 | |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | No | Yes | |
| Mobile Research - Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Research | Interactive Brokers | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | Yes | |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | No | |
| Autochartist | No | No | |
| Trading Central | Yes | No | |
| TipRanks | Yes | No | |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Education | Interactive Brokers | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | Yes | No | |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Major Forex Pairs | Interactive Brokers | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GBP/USD [DELETED] | |||
| USD/JPY [DELETED] | |||
| EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/CHF [DELETED] | |||
| USD/CAD [DELETED] | |||
| NZD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| AUD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| Review | Interactive Brokers Review |
| Overall | Interactive Brokers | IFC Markets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 99 | 73 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Interactive Brokers Review |