Written by ForexBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of Capital.com vs IronFX, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Capital.com and IronFX are both well-established online brokers. Capital.com, founded in 2016, and IronFX, founded earlier in 2010, offer solid regulatory backing. Neither company is publicly traded or operates as a bank, providing users with a straightforward financial service experience. Both brokers possess three Tier-1 licenses, recognized as highly trusted according to ForexBrokers.com. However, only Capital.com holds an additional Tier-2 license, further strengthening its regulatory standing.
In terms of trust scores, Capital.com is rated slightly higher with a score of 87, compared to IronFX's score of 83, placing both brokers in the "trusted" category according to ForexBrokers.com ratings. These scores reflect a comprehensive assessment of their regulatory status and compliance practices, offering traders a reliable and secure trading environment. While both brokers share a similar level of regulatory confidence, Capital.com's extra Tier-2 license and slightly higher trust score may offer an edge for cautious investors.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
IronFX
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2016 | 2010 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 3 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 1 | 0 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 2 | 1 |
When comparing Capital.com and IronFX, Capital.com stands out with more competitive pricing, slightly below the industry average. Capital.com provides a universal account for retail traders and offers a professional account for those qualifying as elective professional traders. It's important to note that professional clients do not receive the same regulatory protection as retail traders. With an average dynamic spread of 0.67 pips on the EUR/USD, Capital.com is an attractive option for low-cost forex trading, particularly given its 5-star rating for commissions and fees, ranking 3rd among 63 brokers according to ForexBrokers.com.
Conversely, IronFX appears to have room for improvement in its pricing strategy, as its spreads often surpass the industry average. Their standard variable spread account typically lists a spread of 1.8 pips, though specific time frames are not detailed and spread variations exist across different account types. The zero-fixed spread account starts at zero but with an $18 per lot commission and extends to 3 pips overnight. Despite these higher costs, IronFX maintains a respectable 4-star rating for commissions and fees, positioned at 47th out of 63 brokers according to ForexBrokers.com.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
IronFX
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $10 | $50 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 0.67 | 1.2 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.67 | N/A |
| Non-wire bank transfer | No | No |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
Capital.com vs IronFX: both support forex trading via CFDs or spot. Capital.com offers a much larger lineup with 5,585 tradeable symbols and 125 currency pairs, while IronFX lists 340 symbols and 83 pairs. Both brokers let you trade cryptocurrency via CFDs, but neither allows purchasing actual, delivered crypto.
Neither broker provides access to exchange-traded shares on U.S. or international exchanges (non-CFDs). IronFX includes copy trading, whereas Capital.com does not. Reflecting the broader selection, Capital.com is rated 4.5 out of 5 for Range of Investments and ranks #23 out of 63 brokers by ForexBrokers.com; IronFX holds a 3.5 out of 5 rating and ranks #52.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
IronFX
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 5585 | 340 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 125 | 83 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | No | No |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | No | No |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | No |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
Capital.com and IronFX both offer free demo (paper) accounts, Windows desktop downloads, and web-based platforms. Each supports trading directly from charts and includes MetaTrader 4 (MT4), while neither supports MetaTrader 5 (MT5). Key differences: Capital.com provides a proprietary, in-house platform, whereas IronFX does not; meanwhile, IronFX offers copy trading, which Capital.com lacks.
For trading platforms and tools, ForexBrokers.com rates Capital.com at 4.5 out of 5 stars and ranks it #10 out of 63 brokers, while IronFX earns 3.5 stars and ranks #62. If you want a higher-rated, broker-built platform, Capital.com is appealing; if copy trading alongside MT4 is a priority, IronFX could be the better fit.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
IronFX
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | No |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | Yes |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | Yes | Yes |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | No |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 97 | 30 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
Capital.com and IronFX both offer iPhone and Android trading apps with price alerts. Each mobile app includes 30 technical studies, the ability to draw trendlines, and auto-saving of chart drawings. However, neither app syncs watchlists between mobile and web, so changes you make in one place won’t appear in the other.
The key difference is quality and standing: Capital.com earns 4.5 out of 5 stars and ranks #11 out of 63 brokers for Mobile Trading Apps on ForexBrokers.com, while IronFX scores 3.5 stars and ranks #63. If you want a smoother mobile trading experience for stocks and forex with similar charting tools but stronger ratings, Capital.com is the better pick; IronFX covers the basics but falls behind in reviews.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
IronFX
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | No | No |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 30 | 30 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
Capital.com and IronFX both cover the essentials for market research: each provides daily market commentary, an economic calendar, and forex news from major sources such as Bloomberg, Reuters, or Dow Jones. According to ForexBrokers.com, Capital.com is rated 4.5 stars for Research and ranks #14 out of 63 brokers, while IronFX is rated 4 stars and ranks #29—useful context if research depth is a priority for you.
When it comes to tools, IronFX offers Trading Central for technical analysis, whereas Capital.com does not. Capital.com counters with a sentiment tool that shows the ratio of long vs. short positions, plus TipRanks-powered research—neither of which IronFX lists as available (IronFX access to TipRanks or Acuity Trading is not specified). Both brokers lack Autochartist, and Capital.com does not include Acuity Trading. If you want Trading Central, IronFX is the better match; if you prefer sentiment data and TipRanks insights alongside premium news, Capital.com has the edge.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
IronFX
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | Yes |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes |
| Autochartist | No | No |
| Trading Central | No | Yes |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | No |
| TipRanks | Yes | |
| Acuity Trading | No | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
For beginners comparing forex and CFD education, both Capital.com and IronFX deliver a clear video-led path. Each broker offers at least 10 beginner-friendly trading videos, helping new traders learn the basics step by step. Neither broker runs monthly live educational webinars, so if you prefer live classes, you won’t find them here. Capital.com goes further for growing traders with at least 10 advanced videos, while IronFX does not match that level of advanced video depth.
These differences show up in third-party ratings. Capital.com earns 4.5 out of 5 stars for Education and ranks #8 out of 63 brokers on ForexBrokers.com. IronFX holds 4 out of 5 stars and ranks #44. If you want beginner content with a clear path to advanced topics, Capital.com is the stronger choice; if you only need beginner videos, IronFX can still meet the need.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
IronFX
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | No |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | No |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that Capital.com is better than IronFX. Capital.com finished with an overall rank of #10, while IronFX finished with an overall rank of #48.
Capital.com stands out for its quality research, strong educational content, and innovative web platform. Capital.com holds fewer regulatory licenses and offers a narrower range of markets than some of the best brokers, but still significantly outperforms the industry average.
| Feature |
Capital.com
|
IronFX
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 87 | 83 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Commissions & Fees |
|
|
| Platforms & Tools |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
Capital.com vs IronFX: neither platform lets you buy actual (delivered) cryptocurrency, but both allow trading cryptocurrency CFDs.
Capital.com vs IronFX: Capital.com does not support ACH or SEPA transfers but does allow deposits and withdrawals via PayPal, Skrill, and bank wire (Visa/Mastercard not specified), whereas IronFX likewise does not support ACH or SEPA and its availability of PayPal, Skrill, Visa/Mastercard, and bank wire is not specified.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | Capital.com | IronFX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Commissions & Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Platforms & Tools |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 87 | 83 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Capital.com Review |
| Broker Screenshots | Capital.com | IronFX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
IG
CMC Markets
FOREX.com
XTB
eToro
AvaTrade
Plus500
Pepperstone
FP Markets
Tickmill