Written by ForexBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of Trading 212 vs easyMarkets, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Both Trading 212 and easyMarkets are well-regarded in the online brokerage world, having been established in 2004 and 2001 respectively. Neither company is publicly traded nor operates as a bank, which is a common trait in the industry. In terms of regulation, Trading 212 holds three Tier-1 licenses, showing a commitment to high compliance standards. On the other hand, easyMarkets holds two Tier-1 licenses and one Tier-2 license, which broadens their regulatory coverage but with a slightly lower emphasis on the topmost tier.
When comparing trustworthiness based on ForexBrokers.com Trust Scores, easyMarkets edges out with a score of 84, denoting a high level of trust, while Trading 212 scores an 80, marking them as trusted but just below the highly trusted threshold. These ratings can offer peace of mind to users looking for reliable platforms to manage their trading activities. Whether opting for Trading 212’s strong focus on elite regulatory licenses or easyMarkets’ balanced license portfolio, traders can rest assured knowing they are engaging with brokers that prioritize trust and compliance.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
easyMarkets
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2004 | 2001 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 2 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 0 | 1 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 2 |
Comparing commissions and fees, Trading 212 earns 4 out of 5 stars and ranks #50 of 63 brokers for this category, while easyMarkets scores 3.5 out of 5 stars and ranks #53 of 63. Ratings aside, the real difference shows up in spreads and how each broker prices popular forex pairs like EUR/USD.
Trading 212 promotes zero-commission CFD trading, but you still pay the spread. For April 2025, its published average spread on EUR/USD was 2.7 pips, which is high versus the industry average and can make frequent trading more costly. Note: Trading 212 has two accounts—Invest (for shares) and CFD (for CFDs)—and the fees comparison here focuses on the CFD account.
easyMarkets uses fixed or variable spreads depending on platform. On its own platform and on TradingView, EUR/USD is fixed at 0.8 pips. On MT4, spreads are about 1.7 pips for the Standard account and drop to 0.7 pips with VIP. MT5 offers variable spreads starting from 0.7 pips. In practical terms, easyMarkets is typically cheaper than Trading 212 for EUR/USD, especially on VIP or when using its proprietary platform or TradingView.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
easyMarkets
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | €1 | $25 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 2.7 | 0.8 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 2.7 | 0.8 |
| Non-wire bank transfer | Yes | Yes |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
Comparing Trading 212 vs easyMarkets on range of investments, Trading 212 offers a far wider lineup: 7,868 tradeable symbols versus 230 at easyMarkets. Both brokers support forex trading as CFDs/spot, but Trading 212 lists 146 forex pairs compared with 63 at easyMarkets. Both also offer cryptocurrency via CFDs, while neither lets you buy actual, delivered crypto.
Trading 212 stands out for real share dealing: you can buy exchange-traded securities on both U.S. and international exchanges (think Apple on NASDAQ and Vodafone in London). easyMarkets does not offer real shares, focusing instead on CFDs. For extras, easyMarkets includes copy trading, while Trading 212 does not. Reflecting these differences, Trading 212 earned 5 stars and ranks #16 of 63 brokers for Range of Investments, whereas easyMarkets holds 3.5 stars and ranks #55. If you want broader market access and real stock ownership, Trading 212 is the stronger pick; if you prefer a simpler CFD lineup with copy trading, easyMarkets may suit you.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
easyMarkets
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 7868 | 230 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 146 | 63 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | Yes | No |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | No |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | No |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
Comparing Trading 212 vs easyMarkets for trading platforms and tools: both brokers provide free demo (paper) accounts, proprietary platforms, web-based trading, and the ability to place trades directly from charts. Key differences: easyMarkets offers a Windows desktop platform, copy trading, and access to MetaTrader 4 (MT4) and MetaTrader 5 (MT5), while Trading 212 does not support a desktop download, copy trading, or MT4/MT5.
Both brokers earn 4 stars for platforms and tools, yet their rankings differ: Trading 212 is ranked #20 out of 63 brokers, while easyMarkets is #36. Indicator totals and watchlist column counts were not specified. In short, Trading 212 suits traders who prefer a streamlined in-house web experience, whereas easyMarkets appeals to those who want a Windows desktop app, copy trading, and the MetaTrader suite.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
easyMarkets
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | No | Yes |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | No | Yes |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | Yes |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 54 | 15 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
Trading 212 and easyMarkets both offer mobile trading apps for iPhone and Android, and each earns a 4-star rating for mobile. If rankings matter to you, ForexBrokers.com places Trading 212 at #17 out of 63 brokers for Mobile Trading Apps, while easyMarkets sits at #32, suggesting Trading 212 has a slight edge overall in this category.
Feature-wise, both apps sync watchlists with your online account and let you draw trendlines on charts. Trading 212 stands out with price alerts (easyMarkets does not offer them), auto-saving of chart drawings (easyMarkets does not), and a wider range of technical studies for charting—104 versus 81. If you value alerts and saving your chart work between sessions, Trading 212 is likely the better fit; if you just need core charting and syncing on iPhone or Android, easyMarkets will cover the basics.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
easyMarkets
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | No |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 104 | 81 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | No |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
When it comes to market research, Trading 212 and easyMarkets share several strengths: both provide forex news from top-tier sources like Bloomberg or Reuters, offer a handy economic calendar, and include a sentiment tool that shows the ratio of long vs. short positions. Neither broker integrates Autochartist, TipRanks, or Acuity Trading tools. One clear difference is daily market commentary—easyMarkets publishes it, while Trading 212 does not.
Another key distinction is Trading Central access: easyMarkets includes Trading Central tools, whereas Trading 212 does not. Despite these differences, both brokers earn the same Research rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars. In ForexBrokers.com’s Research category, easyMarkets ranks #44 out of 63 brokers, edging out Trading 212 at #45. If you want daily commentary and Trading Central, easyMarkets has the advantage; if you mainly need quality news, an economic calendar, and sentiment data, either platform can work well.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
easyMarkets
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | No | Yes |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes |
| Autochartist | No | No |
| Trading Central | No | Yes |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes |
| TipRanks | No | No |
| Acuity Trading | No | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
Trading 212 vs easyMarkets for beginner education: both brokers offer sizable self-paced learning with at least 10 beginner videos and 10 advanced videos that cover core trading topics. If you want live instruction, easyMarkets runs monthly client webinars, while Trading 212 does not. That makes easyMarkets a better fit for learners who like scheduled guidance, and Trading 212 more suited to those who prefer on-demand lessons.
Both brokers earn a 3.5 out of 5 for Education from ForexBrokers.com. In the Education category, Trading 212 ranks #21 out of 63 brokers, while easyMarkets ranks #39. If you value live webinars, go with easyMarkets; if you want a higher-ranked library for self-study, Trading 212 has the edge.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
easyMarkets
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | Yes |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that Trading 212 is better than easyMarkets. Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #31, while easyMarkets finished with an overall rank of #42.
Best known for its mobile trading app, Trading 212 offers an easy-to-use trading platform suite for CFD and share trading, as well as a large variety of forex pairs. However, despite its well-designed platform and wide range of symbols, its lack of advanced trading tools and flat research offerings hamper Trading 212’s bid to be considered a top broker.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
easyMarkets
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 80 | 84 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Commissions & Fees |
|
|
| Platforms & Tools |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
Trading 212 vs easyMarkets: neither broker offers the ability to buy actual (delivered) cryptocurrency, but both allow trading cryptocurrencies via CFDs.
Trading 212 vs easyMarkets: both support ACH/SEPA transfers; Trading 212 also offers PayPal and bank wire deposits/withdrawals and does not support Skrill, while easyMarkets’ availability of PayPal, Skrill, Visa/Mastercard, and bank wires is not specified.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | Trading 212 | easyMarkets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Commissions & Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Platforms & Tools |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 80 | 84 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Trading 212 Review | easyMarkets Review |
| Broker Screenshots | Trading 212 | easyMarkets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
|
|
| Regulation | Trading 212 | easyMarkets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 80 | 84 | |
| Year Founded | 2004 | 2001 | |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No | |
| Bank | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes | |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 2 | |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 0 | 1 | |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 2 |
| Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | Trading 212 | easyMarkets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (ASIC Authorised) | No | Yes | |
| Canada (CIRO Authorised) | No | No | |
| Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Japan (FSA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Singapore (MAS Authorised) | No | No | |
| Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | |||
| United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | No | |
| New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes |
| Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | Trading 212 | easyMarkets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya (CMA Authorised) | |||
| Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | No | |
| South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | No | Yes | |
| UAE (DFSA, FSRA, or SCA Authorised) | No | No | |
| India (SEBI Authorised) | No | No | |
| Jordan (JSC Authorised) |
| Investments | Trading 212 | easyMarkets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 7868 | 230 | |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 146 | 63 | |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | Yes | No | |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | No | |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes | |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
| Cost | Trading 212 | easyMarkets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 2.7 | 0.8 | |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 2.7 | 0.8 | |
| Inactivity Fee | No | No | |
| Order execution: Agency | Yes | No | |
| Order execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
| Funding | Trading 212 | easyMarkets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | €1 | $25 | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | ||
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | ||
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | ||
| Non-wire bank transfer | Yes | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | Trading 212 | easyMarkets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | No | Yes | |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes | |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | No | Yes | |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | Yes | |
| cTrader | No | No |
| Trading Tools | Trading 212 | easyMarkets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
| Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 54 | 15 | |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
| Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Trading | Trading 212 | easyMarkets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | No | |
| Mobile Watchlist [DELETED] | |||
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 104 | 81 | |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | No | |
| Mobile Research - Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Research | Trading 212 | easyMarkets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | No | Yes | |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes | |
| Autochartist | No | No | |
| Trading Central | No | Yes | |
| TipRanks | No | No | |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Education | Trading 212 | easyMarkets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | Yes | |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Major Forex Pairs | Trading 212 | easyMarkets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GBP/USD [DELETED] | |||
| USD/JPY [DELETED] | |||
| EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/CHF [DELETED] | |||
| USD/CAD [DELETED] | |||
| NZD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| AUD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| Review | Trading 212 Review | easyMarkets Review |
| Overall | Trading 212 | easyMarkets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Commissions & Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Platforms & Tools |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 80 | 84 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Trading 212 Review | easyMarkets Review |
IG
CMC Markets
FOREX.com
XTB
eToro
AvaTrade
Pepperstone
FP Markets
Tickmill