Trading 212 vs FXGT.com 2025
In this head to head comparison of Trading 212 vs FXGT.com, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
In this head to head comparison of Trading 212 vs FXGT.com, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Trading 212 and FXGT.com are both online brokers that cater to traders looking for a reliable platform. Trading 212, established in 2004, is not publicly traded, nor does it operate as a bank. It holds three Tier-1 licenses, indicating a high level of trustworthiness, and boasts a Trust Score of 80, rating it as a trusted broker according to ForexBrokers.com.
On the other hand, FXGT.com started operating in 2019 and, like Trading 212, is neither publicly traded nor a bank. It holds one Tier-1 license and also one Tier-2 license, backing its credibility. However, with a ForexBrokers.com Trust Score of 69, it is considered a high-risk broker. For traders and investors, these factors highlight the importance of considering regulatory credentials when choosing an online broker.
| Feature |
|
FXGT.com
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2004 | 2019 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 1 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 0 | 1 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 2 |
Trading 212’s fees are centered on spreads rather than ticket commissions. It offers an Invest account (1 EUR minimum) and a CFD account (10 EUR minimum); the overview here refers to the CFD account. While Trading 212 advertises zero-commission trading, you still pay the spread. The broker now publishes average spread data: in April 2025, EUR/USD averaged 2.7 pips, which is higher than the industry average and can make trades costlier. For commissions and fees, Trading 212 is rated 4 out of 5 stars and ranks #50 out of 63 brokers at ForexBrokers.com.
FXGT.com also relies on spreads for most CFD and forex trades, but it does not publish average spread data, making typical costs harder to gauge. In the Commissions and Fees category, FXGT.com is rated 3.5 out of 5 stars and ranks #57 out of 63 brokers at ForexBrokers.com.
In a head-to-head look, Trading 212 offers more pricing transparency by releasing average spreads, whereas FXGT.com keeps that information undisclosed. Trading 212 holds the higher star rating, yet its April 2025 EUR/USD average spread of 2.7 pips was steep compared with leading low-cost brokers. If spreads are your priority, compare each broker’s live quotes and total trading costs before choosing.
| Feature |
|
FXGT.com
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | €1 | $5 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 2.7 | N/A |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 2.7 | N/A |
| Non-wire bank transfer | Yes | Yes |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
If you want the widest range of investments, Trading 212 offers a far larger selection than FXGT.com. Trading 212 lists 7,868 tradeable symbols and 146 forex pairs, while FXGT.com has 117 symbols and 53 forex pairs. Both brokers support forex trading via CFDs or spot, and both allow crypto trading through CFDs (not actual coins).
Trading 212 also lets you buy exchange-traded securities on both U.S. and international markets, whereas FXGT.com does not offer direct share dealing. FXGT.com does include copy trading, which Trading 212 lacks. Reflecting these differences, ForexBrokers.com rates Trading 212 5 stars for Range of Investments and ranks it 16th out of 63 brokers, while FXGT.com earns 3 stars and ranks 62nd.
| Feature |
|
FXGT.com
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 7868 | 117 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 146 | 53 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | Yes | No |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | No |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | No |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
Trading 212 and FXGT.com both make it easy to practice with a free paper trading (demo) account and let you place trades straight from charts in a web browser. The key difference is platform choice: Trading 212 offers its own in-house platform and does not support MT4 or MT5, nor a Windows desktop download. FXGT.com, on the other hand, does not have a proprietary platform but supports MetaTrader 4 (MT4) and MetaTrader 5 (MT5), including a Windows desktop platform, plus copy trading. Both brokers provide web-based trading.
While specific counts for chart indicators and watch list columns aren’t listed here, both brokers earn 4 out of 5 stars for Trading Platforms and Tools. According to ForexBrokers.com, Trading 212 ranks higher (#20 of 63) than FXGT.com (#57 of 63) in this category. Choose Trading 212 if you prefer a simple, in-house web platform with a demo account; pick FXGT.com if you want MT4/MT5, desktop trading on Windows, and copy trading features.
| Feature |
|
FXGT.com
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | No |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | No | Yes |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | No | Yes |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | Yes |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 54 | 37 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
Both Trading 212 and FXGT.com offer full-featured mobile trading apps for iPhone and Android. Each app supports price alerts, synced watchlists across mobile and web, and drawing tools like trendlines that auto-save to your charts—handy for tracking stocks and forex on the go.
The main difference is charting depth. Trading 212 includes 104 technical studies, while FXGT.com offers 30. That advantage is reflected in reviews: Trading 212 earns 4 out of 5 stars and ranks #17 out of 63 brokers for Mobile Trading Apps on ForexBrokers.com, compared to FXGT.com’s 3.5 stars and #59 ranking. If you want more indicators and analysis tools, Trading 212 may fit better; if you need the essentials with alerts and syncing, both apps deliver.
| Feature |
|
FXGT.com
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 104 | 30 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
Comparing Trading 212 vs FXGT.com for market research, both brokers skip daily market commentary and do not integrate Autochartist, Trading Central, or Acuity Trading tools. Trading 212 pulls ahead by offering forex news from top-tier sources like Bloomberg, Reuters, or Dow Jones, while FXGT.com does not. Both provide a sentiment tool that shows the ratio of long and short positions and include an economic calendar. Trading 212 does not offer TipRanks; FXGT.com’s TipRanks availability is not specified.
On ratings, Trading 212 scores 3.5 out of 5 for Research and ranks 45th of 63 brokers on ForexBrokers.com. FXGT.com scores 3 out of 5 and ranks 57th. If integrated, high-quality news is important to you, Trading 212 is the stronger choice; if you mainly want sentiment data and an economic calendar, both platforms cover those basics.
| Feature |
|
FXGT.com
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | No | No |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | No |
| Autochartist | No | No |
| Trading Central | No | No |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes |
| TipRanks | No | |
| Acuity Trading | No | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
For beginners comparing Trading 212 and FXGT.com on education, Trading 212 clearly offers more to get you started. It provides at least 10 beginner-focused trading videos and also 10+ advanced videos, making it easier to learn at your own pace across core topics like forex and CFDs. FXGT.com, by contrast, does not meet the 10-video threshold for either beginner or advanced lessons. Neither broker runs monthly educational webinars, so if live classroom-style sessions are important to you, you won’t find them here.
The ratings reflect this gap: Trading 212 earns 3.5 out of 5 stars for Education and ranks 21st out of 63 brokers on ForexBrokers.com. FXGT.com scores 3 out of 5 stars and ranks 61st out of 63. If you’re a new trader who prefers a structured library of video lessons, Trading 212 is the stronger pick, while FXGT.com may feel limited for learners seeking a fuller catalog of beginner content.
| Feature |
|
FXGT.com
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | No |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | No |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | No |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that Trading 212 is better than FXGT.com. Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #31, while FXGT.com finished with an overall rank of #59.
Best known for its mobile trading app, Trading 212 offers an easy-to-use trading platform suite for CFD and share trading, as well as a large variety of forex pairs. However, despite its well-designed platform and wide range of symbols, its lack of advanced trading tools and flat research offerings hamper Trading 212’s bid to be considered a top broker.
| Feature |
|
FXGT.com
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 80 | 69 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Commissions & Fees |
|
|
| Platforms & Tools |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
Trading 212 and FXGT.com both do not support buying actual (delivered) cryptocurrencies, but each broker offers cryptocurrency CFD trading.
Trading 212 vs FXGT.com deposit and withdrawal methods: both support ACH/SEPA; Trading 212 also supports PayPal and bank wires but not Skrill, while FXGT.com’s availability of PayPal, Skrill, Visa/Mastercard, and bank wires is not specified.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | Trading 212 | FXGT.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Commissions & Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Platforms & Tools |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 80 | 69 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Broker Screenshots | Trading 212 | FXGT.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
| Regulation | Trading 212 | FXGT.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 80 | 69 | |
| Year Founded | 2004 | 2019 | |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No | |
| Bank | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes | |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 1 | |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 0 | 1 | |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 2 |
| Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | Trading 212 | FXGT.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (ASIC Authorised) | No | ||
| Canada (CIRO Authorised) | No | ||
| Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | ||
| Japan (SFC Authorised) | No | ||
| Singapore (MAS Authorised) | No | ||
| Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | |||
| United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | Yes | ||
| USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | ||
| New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | ||
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes |
| Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | Trading 212 | FXGT.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya (CMA Authorised) | |||
| Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | ||
| South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | No | Yes | |
| UAE (DFSA, FSRA, or SCA Authorised) | No | ||
| India (SEBI Authorised) | No | ||
| Jordan (JSC Authorised) |
| Investments | Trading 212 | FXGT.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 7868 | 117 | |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 146 | 53 | |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | Yes | No | |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | No | |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes | |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | No | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
| Cost | Trading 212 | FXGT.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 2.7 | N/A | |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 2.7 | N/A | |
| Inactivity Fee | No | No | |
| Order execution: Agency | Yes | No | |
| Order execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
| Funding | Trading 212 | FXGT.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | €1 | $5 | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | ||
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | ||
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | ||
| Non-wire bank transfer | Yes | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | Trading 212 | FXGT.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | No | |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | No | Yes | |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes | |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | No | Yes | |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | Yes | |
| cTrader | No | No |
| Trading Tools | Trading 212 | FXGT.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
| Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 54 | 37 | |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
| Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Trading | Trading 212 | FXGT.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Watchlist [DELETED] | |||
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 104 | 30 | |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Research - Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Research | Trading 212 | FXGT.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | No | No | |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | No | |
| Autochartist | No | No | |
| Trading Central | No | No | |
| TipRanks | No | ||
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Education | Trading 212 | FXGT.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | No | |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | No | |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | No |
| Major Forex Pairs | Trading 212 | FXGT.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GBP/USD [DELETED] | |||
| USD/JPY [DELETED] | |||
| EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/CHF [DELETED] | |||
| USD/CAD [DELETED] | |||
| NZD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| AUD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| Review | Trading 212 Review |
| Overall | Trading 212 | FXGT.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Commissions & Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Platforms & Tools |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 80 | 69 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Trading 212 Review |