Written by ForexBrokers.com
In this head to head comparison of Trading 212 vs Octa, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Trading 212 vs Octa: Trading 212 was founded in 2004, while Octa began in 2011. Neither broker is publicly traded, and neither is a bank.
Regulation and safety: According to ForexBrokers.com, Trading 212 holds three Tier-1 licenses and no Tier-2 licenses; Octa holds one Tier-1 and one Tier-2. On the ForexBrokers.com Trust Score (out of 99), Trading 212 scores 82 (trusted), while Octa scores 73 (average risk). For context: 90–99 highly trusted; 80–89 trusted; 70–79 average risk; 60–69 high risk; below 59 not trusted.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Octa
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 2004 | 2011 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 1 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 0 | 1 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 1 |
When comparing commissions and fees, Trading 212 and Octa both earn 4 out of 5 stars, but Octa edges ahead slightly in the ForexBrokers.com ranking. Trading 212 is ranked #27 out of 36 brokers, while Octa is ranked #26 out of 36. Trading 212 offers zero-commission trading on its CFD account, but you still pay the spread, and its published EUR/USD average spread of 2.7 pips for April 2025 is well above the industry average. Octa has improved its pricing over time and now sits closer to the lowest-cost MetaTrader brokers.
Trading 212’s fee structure is simple on the surface, but its spread costs can make trading more expensive than it first appears, especially for forex and CFD traders. Octa also charges through spreads rather than commissions, but it stands out for no overnight carry costs and no slippage on 97.5% of executed orders. That said, Octa’s pricing can vary by account type and regulatory entity, and it does not always provide a date range for its average spread figures, which makes the comparison less precise.
In plain terms, Trading 212 may appeal to beginners who like a straightforward “zero commission” message, but its spread pricing is less competitive. Octa looks better on costs overall, especially for traders focused on MetaTrader platforms, though some account restrictions may matter for active traders. If low trading costs are your main goal, Octa has the slight edge in this category.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Octa
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | €1 | $25 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 2.7 | 0.9 |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 2.7 | N/A |
| Non-wire bank transfer | Yes | No |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | No |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | Yes |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
Trading 212 offers a much wider range of investments than Octa, making it the stronger choice for traders and investors who want more options in one place. Trading 212 supports forex trading as CFDs or spot contracts, gives access to about 13,000 tradeable symbols and 180 forex pairs, and lets clients buy actual shares on both U.S. and international exchanges. It also allows the purchase of real cryptocurrency, in addition to crypto CFDs. By comparison, Octa also offers forex trading as CFDs or spot contracts, but its selection is smaller, with around 300 tradeable symbols and 35 forex pairs. Octa does offer international exchange-traded securities and crypto CFDs, but it does not provide U.S.-listed shares or actual cryptocurrency.
Another key difference is copy trading, which Octa offers but Trading 212 does not. Even so, Trading 212 receives a better overall score for range of investments, with 5 out of 5 stars versus Octa’s 3.5 stars. In ForexBrokers.com’s ranking of 36 brokers, Trading 212 places #15 for range of investments, while Octa comes in at #33. For anyone looking for broader market access, Trading 212 is the more versatile platform overall.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Octa
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 13000 | 300 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 180 | 35 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | Yes | No |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | Yes | No |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
Trading 212 and Octa both give traders a web-based platform and a free demo account for paper trading, so each can work well for beginners who want to practice before using real money. Both also let you place trades directly from a chart, which can make quick order entry easier. In ForexBrokers.com’s Trading Platforms and Tools category, both brokers are rated 4 out of 5 stars, but Trading 212 ranks higher overall at #19 out of 36 brokers, compared with Octa at #30.
The biggest difference is in platform choice and extra tools. Trading 212 does not offer a proprietary desktop platform, MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, or copy trading, while Octa offers all of these, including a Windows desktop platform and its own in-house platform. That gives Octa more options for traders who want advanced charting and third-party platforms, while Trading 212 keeps things simpler with its browser-based setup.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Octa
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | No | Yes |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | No | Yes |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | No | Yes |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | Yes |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 102 | 30 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
Trading 212 and Octa both offer iPhone and Android apps, along with stock or forex price alerts, trendline drawing, and auto-saving for chart drawings. Each mobile app is also rated 4 out of 5 stars for mobile trading. So, on the basics, both brokers give traders a similar mobile experience that works well for managing trades on the go.
The bigger difference is in charting and app syncing. Trading 212 stands out with 104 technical studies in its mobile app, compared with 30 for Octa, and it also lets watchlists sync between the mobile app and online account, which Octa does not. That extra convenience helps Trading 212 earn a stronger mobile trading apps ranking from ForexBrokers.com, where it places 17th out of 36 brokers versus Octa’s 29th place.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Octa
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | No |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 104 | 30 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
When it comes to market research, Trading 212 and Octa both give traders access to forex news from top names like Bloomberg, Reuters, and Dow Jones, plus an economic calendar for tracking major global events. Trading 212 also stands out with a sentiment tool that shows the split between long and short positions, which can help traders gauge market mood. However, it does not offer daily market commentary or Autochartist tools, and it also lacks Trading Central, TipRanks, and Acuity Trading research features.
Octa has a slight edge for market research because it includes daily market commentary and Autochartist tools, which can be useful for both technical and fundamental analysis. Like Trading 212, it also provides top-tier forex news and an economic calendar, but it does not offer Trading Central, TipRanks, Acuity Trading, or a sentiment-based trading tool. Reflecting these differences, Octa is rated 4 stars for Research and ranked #24 out of 36 brokers by ForexBrokers.com, while Trading 212 is rated 3.5 stars and ranked #32.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Octa
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | No | Yes |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes |
| Autochartist | No | Yes |
| Trading Central | No | No |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | No |
| TipRanks | No | No |
| Acuity Trading | No | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
When it comes to beginner learning tools, both Trading 212 and Octa give new traders plenty to work with. Each broker offers at least 10 beginner videos and at least 10 advanced videos, so users can find material for both early learning and more detailed study. Trading 212 also has forex or CFD education content, but it does not offer monthly educational webinars. Octa, on the other hand, goes a step further with online educational webinars held at least once a month, which can be especially helpful for beginners who like learning in a live format.
Looking at overall education quality, Octa is rated 4 out of 5 stars, while Trading 212 scores 3.5 stars. That said, ForexBrokers.com ranks Trading 212 higher in the Education category at #20 out of 36 brokers, compared with Octa at #32. For beginners who want regular live sessions, Octa may feel more helpful, while Trading 212 still offers a solid mix of videos and forex or CFD learning content.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Octa
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | Yes |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that Trading 212 is better than Octa. Trading 212 finished with an overall rank of #25, while Octa finished with an overall rank of #34.
Best known for its mobile trading app, Trading 212 offers an easy-to-use trading platform suite for CFD and share trading, as well as a large variety of forex pairs. However, despite its well-designed platform and wide range of symbols, its lack of advanced trading tools and flat research offerings hamper Trading 212’s bid to be considered a top broker.
| Feature |
Trading 212
|
Octa
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 82 | 73 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Trading Fees |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
Trading 212 vs Octa: Trading 212 lets you buy actual (delivered) cryptocurrency and trade crypto CFDs, while Octa offers only cryptocurrency CFDs and does not provide access to buy real, delivered crypto.
Trading 212 vs Octa: for deposits and withdrawals, Trading 212 supports ACH/SEPA and bank wire transfers but not PayPal or Skrill, whereas Octa supports Skrill and bank wires but not ACH/SEPA or PayPal; Visa/Mastercard availability is not specified for either broker.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | Trading 212 | Octa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 82 | 73 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Trading 212 Review | Octa Review |
| Broker Screenshots | Trading 212 | Octa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
|
|
| Regulation | Trading 212 | Octa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 82 | 73 | |
| Year Founded | 2004 | 2011 | |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | No | No | |
| Bank | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes | |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 3 | 1 | |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 0 | 1 | |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 1 |
| Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | Trading 212 | Octa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (ASIC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Canada (CIRO Authorised) | No | No | |
| Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | No | No | |
| Japan (FSA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Singapore (MAS Authorised) | No | No | |
| Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | |||
| United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| USA (CFTC Authorized) | No | No | |
| New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes |
| Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | Trading 212 | Octa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya (CMA Authorised) | |||
| Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | No | |
| South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | No | Yes | |
| UAE (DFSA, FSRA, or CMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| India (SEBI Authorised) | No | No | |
| Jordan (JSC Authorised) |
| Investments | Trading 212 | Octa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 13000 | 300 | |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 180 | 35 | |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | Yes | No | |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes | |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | Yes | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
| Cost | Trading 212 | Octa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 2.7 | 0.9 | |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 2.7 | N/A | |
| Inactivity Fee | No | No | |
| Order execution: Agency | Yes | Yes | |
| Order execution: Market Maker | Yes | Yes |
| Funding | Trading 212 | Octa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | €1 | $25 | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | No | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | Yes | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| Non-wire bank transfer | Yes | No |
| Trading Platforms | Trading 212 | Octa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | No | Yes | |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | No | Yes | |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes | |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | No | Yes | |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | Yes | |
| cTrader | No | No |
| Trading Tools | Trading 212 | Octa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
| Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 102 | 30 | |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
| Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Trading | Trading 212 | Octa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Watchlist [DELETED] | |||
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | No | |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 104 | 30 | |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Research - Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Research | Trading 212 | Octa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | No | Yes | |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes | |
| Autochartist | No | Yes | |
| Trading Central | No | No | |
| TipRanks | No | No | |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | No | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Education | Trading 212 | Octa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | No | Yes | |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Major Forex Pairs | Trading 212 | Octa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GBP/USD [DELETED] | |||
| USD/JPY [DELETED] | |||
| EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/CHF [DELETED] | |||
| USD/CAD [DELETED] | |||
| NZD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| AUD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| Review | Trading 212 Review | Octa Review |
| Overall | Trading 212 | Octa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Trading Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Trading Platforms |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 82 | 73 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Trading 212 Review | Octa Review |
IG
FOREX.com
CMC Markets
XTB
eToro
AvaTrade
Pepperstone
FP Markets
Tickmill