Interactive Brokers vs Exness 2025
In this head to head comparison of Interactive Brokers vs Exness, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
In this head to head comparison of Interactive Brokers vs Exness, we will compare the trading platforms, mobile apps, range of investments, costs, market research, and more. Let's dive in.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 51% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Interactive Brokers and Exness are both well-known names in the online brokerage space, but their levels of regulatory oversight and public trust differ significantly. Founded in 1977, Interactive Brokers is a publicly traded company, adding an extra layer of transparency and accountability. While it is not a bank, the firm holds an impressive nine Tier-1 licenses, which are considered highly trusted, and two Tier-2 licenses. With a top-notch Trust Score rating of 99 from ForexBrokers.com, Interactive Brokers is among the most reliable and secure options available.
Exness, on the other hand, was established in 2008 and is not publicly listed. Like Interactive Brokers, Exness is not a bank. It holds two Tier-1 licenses and three Tier-2 licenses, indicating a solid but more modest level of regulatory commitment compared to Interactive Brokers. The firm has a ForexBrokers.com Trust Score of 81, placing it in the "trusted" category but behind Interactive Brokers when it comes to overall security and trust. While both brokers serve their clients well, their differences in trust ratings and regulation make Interactive Brokers the more reliable choice for those prioritizing these aspects.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Year Founded | 1977 | 2008 |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | Yes | No |
| Bank | No | No |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 9 | 2 |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 2 | 3 |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 3 |
Interactive Brokers (5 stars, ranked #2 of 63 for Commissions and Fees) and Exness (4 stars, ranked #36 of 63) both offer competitive pricing, but they go about it differently. IBKR doesn’t publish average forex spreads, yet during Q3 2024 we observed an average EUR/USD spread of 0.19 pips, translating to an effective all-in cost of about 0.59 pips after commission—low by industry standards. Exness pricing varies by account: its commission-based accounts generally deliver tighter spreads than its commission-free options.
Interactive Brokers aggregates quotes from 17 major interbank dealers and doesn’t mark up spreads; instead, it charges a commission. Forex commissions start at 0.00002 (0.2 bps) of the USD trade value per side with a $2 minimum per order ($4 round turn), roughly $16–$40 per million round turn ($8–$20 per side). For a standard 100,000 EUR/USD trade, the commission works out to about 0.40 pips, which—paired with the Q3 2024 average spread—produced an all-in of ~0.59 pips. Note the $2-per-side minimum makes smaller-than-100k trades proportionally pricier. Very active traders can qualify for discounts (minimum charge dropping to $1.50 per order above $1B/month and $1 above $5B), and IBKR supports RFQ for large orders. IBKR Lite and Pro support forex but are not commission-free.
Exness offers five main account types. Standard Cent and Standard are spread-only with higher spreads; Pro tightens spreads and lets you choose instant (dealer) or market (agency) execution. Its commission-based choices aim for the tightest pricing: the Zero Spread account uses market execution and charges a $0.05 per-trade commission, while the Raw account charges up to $7 per round turn per lot ($3.50 per side) with low spreads; both have a 30% margin-call trigger and no leverage or stop-out restrictions. Bottom line: frequent traders executing standard-lot (or larger) orders may find IBKR’s commission model delivers very low all-in costs, while Exness appeals to those wanting simple spread-only accounts or near-zero spreads with a fixed commission.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $0 | $10 |
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 0.59 | N/A |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.65 | N/A |
| Non-wire bank transfer | Yes | No |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | No |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | Yes |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Low Spread Forex Brokers.
Interactive Brokers delivers one of the widest ranges of markets, with 8,500 tradable symbols and 90 forex pairs. It supports forex as both CFDs (contracts for difference) and spot, and crucially lets clients buy exchange-traded securities on U.S. and international exchanges (for example, Apple on NASDAQ and Vodafone in London). Exness also supports forex as CFDs and spot, and lists 209 symbols with 96 forex pairs, but it does not offer direct access to U.S. or global stocks; its lineup centers on CFDs.
For crypto, Interactive Brokers supports both actual cryptocurrency purchases and crypto CFDs, while Exness offers crypto only as CFDs. Exness does include copy trading, which IB does not. These differences show up in independent ratings: for range of investments, Interactive Brokers earns 5 stars and ranks #1 out of 63 brokers at ForexBrokers.com, while Exness earns 3.5 stars and ranks #56. Choose IB if you want multi-asset investing across global stocks, forex, and crypto; pick Exness if you mainly trade forex and want copy trading tools.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 8500 | 209 |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 90 | 96 |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | Yes | No |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | No |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | Yes | No |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
Dive deeper: Best Copy Trading Platforms.
Interactive Brokers vs Exness: both brokers provide simulated (paper) trading with a free demo account, along with proprietary platforms, Windows desktop software, and web-based platforms. Each also lets you place trades directly from charts. Key differences: Exness supports copy trading and offers MetaTrader 4 (MT4) and MetaTrader 5 (MT5), while Interactive Brokers does not offer copy trading and does not support MT4/MT5. Specific counts for technical indicators and watchlist columns aren’t provided here.
For trading platforms and tools, Interactive Brokers earns 5 stars and ranks #3 out of 63 brokers on ForexBrokers.com, while Exness earns 4 stars and ranks #26. In short, choose Interactive Brokers if you want a highly rated in-house platform experience; pick Exness if you prefer MetaTrader and want built-in copy trading alongside desktop and web access.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes |
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | Yes |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | No | Yes |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | Yes |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 155 | 107 |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best MetaTrader 4 Brokers, Best MetaTrader 5 Brokers.
Interactive Brokers and Exness both offer mobile trading apps for iPhone and Android, complete with price alerts and charting. That said, Interactive Brokers scores higher for mobile trading, earning 5 stars and a #4 ranking out of 63 brokers at ForexBrokers.com, while Exness holds 4 stars and ranks #26. If you want deeper chart tools and tighter account integration, Interactive Brokers has the edge.
On charts, Interactive Brokers provides 97 technical studies (indicators) versus 35 on Exness. Both apps let you draw trendlines, and neither auto-saves drawings. A key difference is watchlists: Interactive Brokers syncs watchlists between the app and your online account so changes carry over, while Exness does not. For traders who lean on synced watchlists and a wider set of indicators, Interactive Brokers stands out; if you need a simple app with alerts and core tools, Exness still gets the job done.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | No |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 97 | 35 |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | No | No |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Trading Apps.
Interactive Brokers and Exness both deliver solid market research essentials. Each provides daily market commentary, an economic calendar, and forex news from top-tier sources like Bloomberg, Reuters, or Dow Jones. Both brokers also include Trading Central tools and sentiment data that show the ratio of long and short positions, helping traders spot trends. Neither broker offers Autochartist.
The key differences come from extra third‑party research. Interactive Brokers adds TipRanks and Acuity Trading (Signal Centre), while Exness does not. According to ForexBrokers.com, Interactive Brokers earns 5 stars for Research and ranks #3 out of 63 brokers, whereas Exness is rated 3.5 stars and ranks #42. If you want broader, integrated research such as TipRanks insights plus Acuity Trading signals, Interactive Brokers has the edge; if you only need core news, calendar, and Trading Central analysis, both will meet that need.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | Yes |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes |
| Autochartist | No | No |
| Trading Central | Yes | Yes |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes |
| TipRanks | Yes | No |
| Acuity Trading | Yes | No |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Brokers for Forex Research.
Interactive Brokers and Exness both give beginners plenty of ways to learn. Each hosts client webinars at least once a month and provides a sizable lineup of beginner-friendly videos (10 or more). When you’re ready to go deeper, both also offer 10+ advanced videos, so you can keep building skills beyond the basics. This mix of on-demand lessons and live sessions helps new traders learn at their own pace and get questions answered in real time.
The quality gap shows up in independent ratings. According to ForexBrokers.com, Interactive Brokers earns 5 stars for Education and ranks #3 out of 63 brokers, while Exness scores 3.5 stars and ranks #47. In plain terms, beginners will likely find Interactive Brokers’ education more comprehensive and better organized. Exness still covers the essentials with regular webinars and plenty of videos, but Interactive Brokers is the stronger choice if you want a more complete learning path.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Webinars | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
Dive deeper: Best Forex Brokers for Beginners.
After testing 63 of the best forex brokers, our research and account testing finds that Interactive Brokers is better than Exness. Interactive Brokers finished with an overall rank of #2, while Exness finished with an overall rank of #43.
Interactive Brokers is a highly trusted multi-asset broker with an extensive offering of tradeable global markets. It delivers competitive fees and high-quality research and education, as well as a modern, institutional-grade trading platform suite.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
|
| Trust Score | 99 | 81 |
| Range of Investments |
|
|
| Commissions & Fees |
|
|
| Platforms & Tools |
|
|
| Research |
|
|
| Mobile Trading |
|
|
| Education |
|
|
Interactive Brokers vs Exness: Interactive Brokers lets you buy actual (delivered) cryptocurrencies and trade crypto CFDs, whereas Exness supports only cryptocurrency CFD trading and does not provide access to buying the underlying coins.
Interactive Brokers vs Exness: for deposits and withdrawals, Interactive Brokers supports ACH/SEPA and bank wires (no PayPal or Skrill), while Exness offers Skrill and bank wires (no PayPal and no ACH/SEPA); Visa/Mastercard availability is not specified for either broker.
Please note:
We review each broker’s overall global offering – a “Yes” checkmark in our Compare Tool does not guarantee the availability of any specific features in your country of residence. To verify the availability of any features within your country of residence, please contact the broker directly.
Select Brokers
↓×Compare
0 of 5| Overall Rating | Interactive Brokers | Exness | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Commissions & Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Platforms & Tools |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 99 | 81 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Interactive Brokers Review | Exness Review |
| Broker Screenshots | Interactive Brokers | Exness | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker Gallery (click to expand) |
| Regulation | Interactive Brokers | Exness | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 99 | 81 | |
| Year Founded | 1977 | 2008 | |
| Publicly Traded (Listed) | Yes | No | |
| Bank | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes | |
| Tier-1 Licenses | 9 | 2 | |
| Tier-2 Licenses | 2 | 3 | |
| Tier-3 Licenses | 0 | 0 | |
| Tier-4 Licenses | 0 | 3 |
| Tier-1 Licenses (Highly Trusted) | Interactive Brokers | Exness | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (ASIC Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| Canada (CIRO Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| Hong Kong (SFC Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| Japan (FSA Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| Singapore (MAS Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| Switzerland (FINMA Authorised) | Yes | ||
| United Kingdom (U.K.) (FCA Authorised) | Yes | Yes | |
| USA (CFTC Authorized) | Yes | No | |
| New Zealand (FMA Authorised) | No | No | |
| Regulated in one or more EU or EEA countries (MiFID). | Yes | Yes |
| Tier-2 Licenses (Trusted) | Interactive Brokers | Exness | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya (CMA Authorised) | Yes | ||
| Israel (ISA Authorised) | No | No | |
| South Africa (FSCA Authorised) | No | Yes | |
| UAE (DFSA, FSRA, or SCA Authorised) | Yes | Yes | |
| India (SEBI Authorised) | Yes | No | |
| Jordan (JSC Authorised) | Yes |
| Investments | Interactive Brokers | Exness | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forex Trading (Spot or CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Tradeable Symbols (Total) | 8500 | 209 | |
| Forex Pairs (Total) | 90 | 96 | |
| U.S. Stocks (Shares) | Yes | No | |
| Global Stocks (Non-U.S. Shares) | Yes | No | |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes | |
| Cryptocurrency (Underlying) | Yes | No | |
| Cryptocurrency (CFDs) | Yes | Yes | |
| Disclaimers | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). | Note: Crypto CFDs are not available to retail traders from any broker's U.K. entity, nor to U.K. residents (except to Professional clients). |
| Cost | Interactive Brokers | Exness | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average spread (EUR/USD) - Standard account | 0.59 | N/A | |
| All-in Cost EUR/USD - Active | 0.65 | N/A | |
| Inactivity Fee | No | No | |
| Order execution: Agency | Yes | Yes | |
| Order execution: Market Maker | No | Yes |
| Funding | Interactive Brokers | Exness | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Deposit | $0 | $10 | |
| PayPal (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | No | |
| Skrill (Deposit/Withdraw) | No | Yes | |
| Bank Wire (Deposit/Withdraw) | Yes | Yes | |
| Non-wire bank transfer | Yes | No |
| Trading Platforms | Interactive Brokers | Exness | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Desktop Trading Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Desktop Platform (Windows) | Yes | Yes | |
| Web Platform | Yes | Yes | |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes | |
| MetaTrader 4 (MT4) | No | Yes | |
| MetaTrader 5 (MT5) | No | Yes | |
| cTrader | No | No |
| Trading Tools | Interactive Brokers | Exness | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Trading (Demo) | Yes | Yes | |
| Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Charting - Indicators / Studies (Total) | 155 | 107 | |
| Charting - Trade From Chart | Yes | Yes | |
| Charts can be saved | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile Trading | Interactive Brokers | Exness | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android App | Yes | Yes | |
| Apple iOS App | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Price Alerts | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Watchlist [DELETED] | |||
| Mobile Watchlists - Syncing | Yes | No | |
| Mobile Charting - Indicators / Studies | 97 | 35 | |
| Mobile Charting - Draw Trendlines | Yes | Yes | |
| Mobile Charting - Trendlines Autosave | No | No | |
| Mobile Research - Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Research | Interactive Brokers | Exness | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Market Commentary (Articles) | Yes | Yes | |
| Forex News (Top-Tier Sources) | Yes | Yes | |
| Autochartist | No | No | |
| Trading Central | Yes | Yes | |
| TipRanks | Yes | No | |
| Client sentiment data | Yes | Yes | |
| Economic Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Education | Interactive Brokers | Exness | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | Yes | Yes | |
| Videos - Beginner Trading Videos | Yes | Yes | |
| Videos - Advanced Trading Videos | Yes | Yes |
| Major Forex Pairs | Interactive Brokers | Exness | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GBP/USD [DELETED] | |||
| USD/JPY [DELETED] | |||
| EUR/USD | Yes | Yes | |
| USD/CHF [DELETED] | |||
| USD/CAD [DELETED] | |||
| NZD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| AUD/USD [DELETED] | |||
| Review | Interactive Brokers Review | Exness Review |
| Overall | Interactive Brokers | Exness | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating |
|
| |
| Commissions & Fees |
|
| |
| Range of Investments |
|
| |
| Platforms & Tools |
|
| |
| Mobile Trading |
|
| |
| Research |
|
| |
| Education |
|
| |
| Trust Score | 99 | 81 | |
| Winner | check_circle | ||
| Review | Interactive Brokers Review | Exness Review |